Yes valuations are very high .
Kept in watchlist.
Yes, I hold Navin Fluorine .
Yes valuations are very high .
Kept in watchlist.
Yes, I hold Navin Fluorine .
can you explain a few thing to me about embassy riet
1)P/e ratio is around 35 but divdend yield is around 7%
2)Are buildings being valued at book value?reason for this is current book value is 290 with 90% occupancy ,a dividend of18 rs with dividend payout being 90% it should give a eps of 20 rs which when divided by real estate value excluding vacancy gives a rental income being close to 9 to 10% higher if we reduce the book value of hotels(as not fully occupied) .This figure seems to high to me considering that usually real estate are bound to give 4 to 5 % rental yields and wealth in real estate is created by capital appreciation because indians like to invest in gold and real estates.
Hi Sahil,
Do you track CAMS? Would like to know your views.
Also would like to discuss which is better play between CAMS and CDSL, assuming lots of IPO’s (especially LIC) are coming in 2021 and thus huge Demat account might get open.
Embassy REIT did their first step in simplifying the holding structure. Details here
https://www1.nseindia.com/corporate/EMBASSY_05032021210511_EmbassyREITSEAnnouncement5March2021.pdf
Application of Bromine is not that wide compared to flourine…hence growth can be slow in neogen
CDSL will be better than CAMS…already people r dumping their MF and focusing on direct investing or ETFs
I think people who are dumping MF’s for equities are the ones who have time to devote to read about various industries/companies and keep a track of it on a regular basis.
For an average investor who doesn’t have bandwidth, and is entering this segment, MF is the easiest.
Even when we purchase ETF’s, CAMS generate revenue out of it since it is considered as a part of fund house AUM.
Disc: Invested in CDSL and tracking CAMS.
It is probably that there is hype due to current rally, soccer people have made money and belive in their skill to identify winners
Many of their friends who think themselves to be more intelligent have jumped in thinking if John can identify multi baggers, I can identify multi multi baggers.
This is my opinion basis inputs from some of my friends.
Some had used lock down to embark on this journey
When mutual fund houses do the bulk/block deal, are they not anyway executing through CDSL?
Working capital of Neogen chemicals is stretched. As a result, you can see the cash flow from operations as negative. The company says, working capital will come down a bit, we should see in the next few quarters how it goes. Opportunity wise, they have good opportunity (they have revenue target of 450 crore by end of FY22, 675 crore by end of FY24). Bharat Shah sir grilled them on this particular aspect in the recent concall.
Hi Sahil
Any views on Titan Biotech/ Kothari Fermentation? As this would be next beneficiary for biotech companies as yeast is the raw material needed in fermentation…
Because they structure their payout in such a way that dividends are only a small part of the distribution per unit. there is also debt from SPV which is ammortized.
Not true for commercial real estate. High quality Commercial real estate has intrinsically higher rental yields due to huge demand and lack of quality (building, design, location) spaces, which is why i invest in it.
Also not true. Over very long durations, the appreciation is only as much as inflation, nothing more. The reason you see faster than inflation appreciation is due to some demand supply mismatch which is local and temporary in nature (imagine an expanding part of a town/city where one has to forecast whether builders are building enough homes compared to # of people who want to live there). Any and all wealth made here is purely by chance and cannot be repeated sustainably and is hence not a skill.
Not really. It is quite overvalued. Also, with 70% of market share, they would only grow as much as the market. A fundamental characteristic I like in my businesses is that they gain market share by growing faster than the market. So, no CAMs for me.
For a similar reason, I do not like CDSL. In addition, CDSL is the smaller company, so it would find it much harder to operate (higher operating costs). CDSL is also somewhat of a platform which is why being the less dominant player also means that they are stuck in a vicious downward spiral cycle and should ideally lose all their market share to NSDL unless they are able to differentiate.
Yay!
Agreed.
Agreed except for ETF part.
Not true. You’re forgetting the Robinhood investors.
Already starting to see this in previous quarter. This is not what worries me. They are overvalued compared to the opportunity size IMO. Much higher Percent of new drugs and new formulations have fluorine than bromine. We should analyze the pipeline pharma and agri innovators to know which out of navin fluorine and neogen is better investment.
have studied it. Looks ok. Decided to not invest since my threshold to invest is high for microcaps and i want to run a concentrated PF. Still continue to track.
Hi Sahil, what is ur view on Neuland labs after the recent run-up? Does it make still look attractive at a PE of above 50?
the PE is not 50. March quarter had an aberration of higher taxes due to corporate tax law change. On normalized earnings, TTM pe is 32. However, what we should observe is the trend in the fundamentals. OPM are mean reverting to previous levels, they will go higher this time due to business mix change, Much higher contribution from the CMS segment and shortage for key APIs in US (follow punit bansal sir on twitter he tweets about this a lot). When it comes to Neuland, I only have 1 song to sing: Abhi toh pawwwry shuru hui hai!
PF price action updates:
Instrument | Avg. cost | LTP | Net chg. | % Allocation | % PF | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDFCFIRSTB | 32.22 | 54.3 | 68.53 | 0.09371422178 | 0.1110528172 | Core |
EMBASSY | 339.39 | 319.16 | -5.96 | 0.1530450523 | 0.1011995292 | Low Risk |
NEULANDLAB | 1210.33 | 2291.25 | 89.31 | 0.0751974695 | 0.1000971448 | Core |
RACLGEAR | 111.01 | 250 | 125.2 | 0.05759568513 | 0.09120478803 | Core |
VAIBHAVGBL | 2259.98 | 4021 | 77.92 | 0.06850743596 | 0.08570713428 | Core |
POLYMED | 439.21 | 898.9 | 104.66 | 0.04797405803 | 0.06903914439 | Core |
MASTEK | 1188.58 | 1321 | 11.14 | 0.07325061454 | 0.05724472264 | Core |
SEQUENT | 185.3 | 241.6 | 30.38 | 0.06220538251 | 0.05702945997 | Core |
LAURUSLABS | 306.6 | 374 | 21.98 | 0.05799183478 | 0.0497411801 | Core |
AXTEL | 232.24 | 313.5 | 34.99 | 0.05090879566 | 0.04832180283 | Core |
NCC | 32.37 | 78.35 | 142.01 | 0.02595018301 | 0.04416584154 | Core |
DYNPRO | 286.83 | 498.9 | 73.94 | 0.03564133778 | 0.04359058638 | Core |
ASTEC | 1050.12 | 1013.65 | -3.47 | 0.06050823893 | 0.04106893033 | Core |
POKARNA | 216.91 | 257.15 | 18.55 | 0.04401617913 | 0.03669180513 | Core |
SAREGAMA | 1575.87 | 1699.95 | 7.87 | 0.03947918105 | 0.02994564547 | Core |
ARMANFIN | 686.05 | 597 | -12.98 | 0.03781169941 | 0.02313633387 | Core |
ROUTE | 1616.88 | 1527.5 | -5.53 | 0.01620263048 | 0.01076313385 | Exploratory |
Growth in Capital Deployed | 12.9% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Returns | 60% |
I think my PF has managed to hold on to the gains despite weakness in the market as a whole. This is most likely due to fact that all of these are high earnings growth companies.
Disc: Not investment advice, for educational purposes only.
PS: Apologies for late replies to everyone, I was in between shifting houses in BLR and hence was unable to spend enough time on my investing commitments.
Hi Sahil,
How do you think about REITs given the WFH related risks to the commercial real estate space? Even occupancies of some of the A Grade office guys seems to be falling + most IT companies have already stated publically their intent to move to a partial WFH model over the next 5 years. How do we price the same and do you think there is a substantial margin of safety to invest today?
This answer by dhiraj beautifully covers my own thoughts about ReITs:
Tldr is that the wfh trend is not sustainable. Despite bearing the heaviest brunt of wfh, embassy reit which is based in Bangalore only lost 2% in terms of occupancy from 93% to 91%. Imo 90% would be the local minima and as vaccinations ramp up, mortalities go down, offices would open up.
I am employed by Google. Even though they are a global giant they do not plan to implement voluntary wfh forever. They intend to make it easier go wfh but we would always have to go to office few days a week in order to collaborate. This means that the office space would have to be maintained. I believe this would be the trend going forward.
For the local IT companies which claim that their employees can wfh forever, I find that they are jumping tbe gun a little. As responsibilities increase same employees would find our congested 3 bhk homes very small for 2 people to productively wfh for multiple years at a time. Work life balance would also be much better when people work from office and hence people would tend to want to work from office in general (there would always be exceptions). Hence some reduction in distribution in short term but very stable over longer term.
Thanks for the reply, the thread you posted was also illuminating.
Still not quite convinced by the WFH argument, especially for IT companies. As mentioned, most IT companies, including TCS which has over 500k employees have publically stated their intent to move to a hybrid WFH model: only 25% employees coming to office each day and no employee spending more than 25% of their time in the office by 2025 (can see on TCS annual report). Lets even say they achieve half of that, so 50% WFH by 2025.
Of the India-wide commercial office space, I think IT is about 35-40%. Their share of incremental absorbtion is also the same. India absorbed close to 50 mn sq-ft of commercial office space in FY20 (all-time high). If IT stops absorbing office space, or god-forbid starts net releasing space, I think we can effectively forget about the 5% annual price hike that most analysts have built into estimates. The question I am trying to answer is, what impact does that have on NAV and on DPUs? I dont think this is an overly pessimistic scenario. Had you asked residential real estate investors in 2010-2011 about residential real estate prices, I think most would have also said that prices are going to increase 5% till eternity. But, prices have been flat there for 8 years now and we cant discount the possibility that the same thing will happen in commercial.
Instrument | Avg. cost | LTP | Net chg. | % Allocation | % PF | Type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDFCFIRSTB | 35.34 | 56.75 | 60.57 | 0.134178335 | 0.1349174315 | Core |
NEULANDLAB | 1285.25 | 2682.9 | 108.75 | 0.0950147904 | 0.1241922322 | Core |
VAIBHAVGBL | 486.76 | 996.7 | 104.76 | 0.09030135267 | 0.1157791021 | Core |
RACLGEAR | 120.16 | 246.55 | 105.18 | 0.07458434209 | 0.09582505909 | Core |
MASTEK | 1208.36 | 1973.7 | 63.34 | 0.08798215111 | 0.08998408854 | Core |
SEQUENT | 185.77 | 290.55 | 56.41 | 0.06996278318 | 0.06851706036 | Core |
LAURUSLABS | 314.92 | 487.45 | 54.79 | 0.06984335606 | 0.06769261274 | Core |
SAREGAMA | 1651.73 | 1975 | 19.57 | 0.07925473751 | 0.05933891764 | Core |
AXTEL | 235.42 | 301.8 | 28.19 | 0.06088086547 | 0.04887007923 | Core |
DYNPRO | 301.61 | 509.05 | 68.78 | 0.04509913939 | 0.04766167545 | Core |
NCC | 34.84 | 76.75 | 120.31 | 0.0330456875 | 0.04558283944 | Core |
POKARNA | 222.5 | 252.25 | 13.37 | 0.05958802297 | 0.04230059552 | Core |
ANGELBRKG | 550.02 | 560.65 | 1.93 | 0.05830688048 | 0.03721512625 | Core |
ARMANFIN | 653.92 | 550.65 | -15.79 | 0.04195755616 | 0.02212318001 | Core |
Growth in Capital Deployed | 0% | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Returns | 71% |
Few very interesting updates:
Disc: This is not buy or sell advice. Only a catalog of my thoughts and decisions. Nobody should construe this as investment advice.