Gufic receives approval from NMPA, China for Prilocaine API
ff6466b7-fa92-48d5-afd7-e4337d33fb39.pdf (291.9 KB)
Gufic receives approval from NMPA, China for Prilocaine API
ff6466b7-fa92-48d5-afd7-e4337d33fb39.pdf (291.9 KB)
Hi all,
I was trying to analyse this company. It looks like the company does not gives segment wise results, they just publish a pie-chart. How do you analyze the segment wise numbers, any particular way or just a rough estimations?
Manufacturing Facility | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unit-1 (Navsari) | Botulinum Toxin Facility, Lyophilized/Powder Injectables Facility, Natural Products (Topical/Liquid), API Facility | |||||||||||||
Product | Capacity | |||||||||||||
Lyophilized | 18 mn vials p.a | |||||||||||||
Ampoule | 12mn p.a | |||||||||||||
Ointment | 6mn tubes p.a | |||||||||||||
Lotion | 6mn bottles p.a | |||||||||||||
Syrup | 6mn bottles p.a. | |||||||||||||
PFS | 2.8mn PFS p.a. | |||||||||||||
Unit-2 (Navsari) | Lyophilized Injectables Facility, Capability to manufacture Liposomal Amphotericin B and Depot Injections (This is EU approved) | |||||||||||||
Product | Capacity | |||||||||||||
Lyophilized | 30mn vials p.a. | |||||||||||||
PFS | 30mn PFS p.a. | |||||||||||||
Belgaum Facility | Natural Products Facility | |||||||||||||
Product | Capacity | |||||||||||||
Capsule | 60 mn p.a. | |||||||||||||
Powder | 3.6 mn p.a. | |||||||||||||
Unit-3 (Indore) | Lyophilized/Powder Injectables Facility, Capability to cater to regulated markets such as US & EU |
|||||||||||||
Product | Capacity | |||||||||||||
Lyophilized | 36 mn vials p.a. | |||||||||||||
PFS | 15mn PFS p.a. | |||||||||||||
Liquid Injections | 60mn units p.a | |||||||||||||
Penem Block (Navsari) | Dedicated facility for Penem Carbapenems (Lyophilized / Dry Powder Inj / Oral Solids / Dual Chamber Bags) | |||||||||||||
Product | Capacity | |||||||||||||
Lyophilized | 3mn vials p.a. | |||||||||||||
Dual Chamber Bags | 24 mn IV bags | |||||||||||||
Dry Powder Inj | 30 mn Vials |
Penem Block in Navsari commercialised in the recent quarter, and the Indore plant is expected to commercialise operations by Q2FY24.
Disclosure: Invested
You seem to have research this very well ( especially how well versed you seem to be with names of the formulations). A few questions:
The best question Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits ( one of the all-time-great investment books) asks companies:
What are you doing that your competitors aren’t, yet ?
For Gufic, it was lyophilised injectables at one time where the industry seems to now moving. In the future what do you think that it could be?
They spend 8-10% of revenue in R&D but judging future R&D is perhaps too difficult for a lay investor. (Scuttlebutt HELP!). What factors does this community think it could be for Gufic to give better growth than the industry?
Q1-FY2024 call notes
Personal comment:
CEO Pranav is well versed with the pharma knowledge, strategy, and qualitative aspects of opportunities they are chasing. He refers Mr Rongta (CFO perhaps) for all questions that involve quantitative aspects. (No comments or judgement. Just an observation)
FY23 annual report notes
Long term aim
New product development, launches & R&D
Company developments
Capex (187.6 cr. vs 87.45 cr. in FY22)
Geographical segment & financials
Exports to 20+ countries, 190+ products with 150+ products under pipeline in 40+ countries
Received 4 new international approvals from Columbia, Uganda and Ecuador
Key markets: India, Germany, Switzerland, South Africa, Russia, Canada, Brazil, Europe
Sales returns: 110.2 cr. (vs 68.95 cr. in FY22)
Sales return provision: 6.4 cr. (vs 7.6 cr. in FY22)
Geographical breakup
No Single Customer accounted for 10%+ of revenues in FY22 and FY23
Forex
Trade receivables (huge red flag): impairment of 69 cr. (vs 39 cr. in FY22)
Credit risk increase: In FY23, they had 10 customers (same as FY22) that owed them 100 cr. (vs 111 cr. in FY22) and accounted for 48.71 % and 73.25 % respectively
Miscellaneous
General trends
India’s drug pricing authority sanctioned 12.1% price increase for scheduled drugs
Over 60% of APIs are procured from foreign sources, with certain APIs exhibiting import dependency rates of 80% to 90%
500 Indian API manufacturers contributing about 8% in global API Industry
India supplies 20% of generics globally
Indian Pharma Industry had growth of 7% in 2022 with market size of Rs. 1.94 cr. Chronic therapies grew by 9% and acute therapies by 5%
IPM has grown at a CAGR of ~11% in domestic and ~16% in exports over last 2 decades
Disclosure: Invested (position size here, no transactions in last-30 days)
Need to see credit impairment with these two data points . ECL has not gone up much & Need to get clarity from management but receivables are still in considered good bracket .there is a increase of 6 cr in dues past 6 months vs past year .
disc:invested
The second picture is important.
140cr is less than 1% default probability. Overall he expects 2.1% to be bad debts out of total debtors of 209.84cr. And it says Undisputed Trade Receivables - Considered Good, in Considered Doubtful the section is blank.
It is scarily presented by writing the words “Credit Impaired”, because only 1.08cr of debtors seems to be impaired at 96% default probability.
Rest of “credit impaired” debtors seem to have a much lower default probability rate.
He had also said in one of the concalls 2-3 qtrs ago that the working capital increase which has impacted cash flow will reverse in the coming FY, we should see positive OCF again in 6 monthly statement. Nevertheless we should ask about this in next concall to have 100% clarity. Hope this helps.
Average expected loss rate has decreased as a trend, still doesn’t answer what you pointed out and should be clarified on call.
But, as receivables took a jump, this might show the current average expected loss rate lower
Just an Observation
Gufic Biosciences was founded in 1970 as an injectable manufacturer (lyophilisation) and then exited API & formulations business by selling its top 6 brands to Ranbaxy in 1997. It re-entered formulation in 2007. It is a R&D focused pharma company (8-10% of revenue) whose business is distributed as such
Domestic Branded segment: 50% revenue with Gross margins 55-60%. Engaged primarily in critical care (life-death operation), Infertility, among others.
Contract Manufacturing (30% revenue contribution at 30% margins) of lyophilised formulations for all top pharma cos of India (one time 170cr topline jump in FY22 earnings for Remdesivir)
Exports (15% revenue contribution) to mainly developing countries and few developed markets like Germany and Switzerland
API (5% revenue contribution) 50% is captive consumption reducing dependence on Chinese APIs.
My understanding is the company primarily runs CMO business along with branded segments as cash cows to fund extensive R&D expenditure. Both father-son duo and rest of the management are experienced & educated in pharma. Son (CEO) studied at John Hopkins (World rank 1 in biotech).
Moat: Pioneering new technologies (drugs and drug delivery systems)
They have consistently brought new technology to India. Lyophilisation is the process of freeze-drying liquid injectable formulation to powder form for easy transport. They were pioneers in this tech but it is now a commoditized market so they are investing in scale- one of the largest lyophilisation capacities in the world. Similarly they are the only Indian co to have got a licence to handle Botulinum Toxin and made a product as effective as Botox (Very toxic).
Key Thesis Pointers
Company just finished a huge capex, new lyophilsation factory will start in September. Operating leverage will begin to play out and management consistently tries to do backward integration (captive API production, CEO mulled making plastic bags for dual-bag chamber tech in the future in concall).
Apart from core business growth in CDMO and branded segment, technology advancements can give pleasant surprises as company regularly brings new technology to India. As the pharma sector picks up again, institutional buying will be the real driver of stock price as it is an established name with competent promoters and track record.
Questions/Risks I’m evaluating
Disc: invested @270 (15% of portfolio)