Just a question: how hard is to develop ADC capabilities ?
Is the gestation period an advantage ?
Just a question: how hard is to develop ADC capabilities ?
Is the gestation period an advantage ?
Piramal Pharma -
Q2 FY 24 results and concall highlights -
Q2 outcomes -
Revenues - 2242 vs 1911 cr, up 17 pc
EBITDA - 403 vs 315 cr, up 28 pc ( margins @ 18 vs 16 pc YoY )
PAT - 23 vs 5 cr
Breakup of Q2 revenues -
CDMO - 1324 vs 1068 cr, up 24 pc
Complex Hospital Generics ( CHG ) - 643 vs 589 cr, up 9 pc
India consumer healthcare ( ICH ) - 277 vs 256 cr, up 8 pc
CDMO vertical’s growth was led by pick up in Innovation related work and on - patent commercial manufacturing. Company has announced a capex of aprox 680 cr for sterile fill finish capabilities at their Lexington facility
CHG is seeing steady volume growth in Inhalation anaesthesia products ( Sevoflurane and Isoflurane ). Company is expanding its capacities @ Dahej and Digwal plants for inhalation anaesthesia products. Company has a product pipeline of 24 products to be launched over next 2-3 yrs in CHG division
ICH growth led by power brands and pick up in E-Comm sales. Power brands ( like - Littles, Lactocalamine, Tetmosol, I-Pill etc ) grew @ 18 pc YoY and now comprise of 48 pc of ICH sales. Launched 9 new products in H1 under the ICH business
Committed to 17000 cr topline with 25 pc EBITDA margins by 2030
Net Debt stands @ 4235 cr ( as on 30 Sep 24 )
50 pc of revenues of the CDMO division is coming from innovation related work ( ie development + commercial manufacturing of on-patent molecules )
The additional capex @ Lexington facility will double their sterile fill finish capacity + lyophilisation capacities and should go commercial by end of FY 27. Company has tied up with multiple customers to commercialise their products from this facility post the expansion
The capex @ Digiwal is to commence manufacturing of Sevoflurane in India for the RoW markets ( they were earlier making Sevofluranne from their US facility @ Bethlehem ). The capex @ Dhaej is to produce the KSM for manufacturing of Sevoflurane
In general, 35 pc of company’s EBITDA comes from H1 and 65 pc comes from H2
New product launches in the India Consumer Health business in H1 include -
Littles - Baby Diapers
Littles - Baby Detergent
I-Active - Period panties
I-Feel - Intimate women wash
Bohem - Men’s hair removal spray
Tri-Active - Mosquito nets
In the injectable pain management segment, their growth remained slow due to supply constraints. They are taking multiple initiatives to strengthen the supply chain. These initiatives are gradually yielding results. In the intrathecal segment, company continues to defend their leadership position in the Baclofen market in the U.S. with over 70% market share
Company is seeing good traction in US in their differentiated product offerings like - Gablofen ( Intrathecal muscle relaxant ), Mitigo ( Morphine - Injectable ), Neoatricon ( Hypotensive - for low BP management in infants ). Would like to build further on such products pipeline
Company intends to diversify the distribution of their ICH business from being Pharmacy + E-Comm focussed to other channels like - modern retail, general trade etc
Company is exited about their new complex product - Neoatricon as it has the potential to remove the manual dosing errors by healthcare professionals while dosing infants. However, they did not comment on its potential mkt size
Seeing higher customer enquiries, visits, RFPs in their CDMO segment due improved biotech funding environment and global supply chain de-risking drives
Current ( as of Mar 24 ) scale of on patent commercial manufacturing for the company is aprox 1700 cr / yr. Revenues from Development + Discovery are around 800 cr cr / yr. Basically the innovative part of CDMO business has a 70:30 split between commercial manufacturing : discovery + development
No of molecules in Phase - 1, 2, 3 development stages @ 68, 38, 33 - as on 31 Mar 24. This looks like a very healthy pipeline
A large portion of some one-off spends in company’s CHG business are expected to hit P&L in Q3. Q4 should be their largest Qtr wrt revenues and profitability
The Lexington capex being undertaken by the company is against firm orders from the customers
Disc: holding from lower levels, at present - the stock price may not be cheap but one may look to start buying if the stock price corrects by 10-15 pc, not SEBI registered, biased, views are personal
JM_Financial_Initiating_Coverage_on_Piramal_Pharma,_with_36%_UPSIDE.pdf (1.8 MB)
Initiating coverage report by by JM Financial, target of INR 340
https://www.bseindia.com/xml-data/corpfiling/AttachLive/7c481d38-3856-4341-9b96-ba12d3b4d67b.pdf
Key Highlights for Q3FY25/9MFY25
Piramal Pharma Q3FY25 Concall Highlights
CDMO
CHG
Others
Good interview of Peter DeYoung Piramal Pharma CEO. Key highlights
Any idea as to how PPL covers the scope of ADC Drug development phase? They have disclosed a substantial portion of overall CDMO sales is from commercials, and shall continue to remain, but still not very clear to me.
Any good sources for understanding the following :
CDRMO market size both globally and India for 1) Innovator 2) Generic
A good source for estimating the growth rate in the above for India
Logical growth rates for PPL in 1. CDRMO 2) CHG and 3) ICH
Piramal group is slowly moving away from a group known for transparent communication and ethical business practices to a typical promoter run company focusing on self benefits and less on stakeholder best practices.
One example of that is appointment of statutory auditors. Earlier Piramal enterprises (before demerger) was audited by big 4 firm Deloitte. Once demerged, Piramal Ent (financial business) moved to a local auditor M/s.Suresh Surana and now even Piramal Pharma has decided to hire the same firm replacing Deloitte…
Considering Piramal Pharma’s global footprint and ambitions, this move is very puzzling. For its balance sheet size, cost reduction cannot be the driving factor for this change. Highly disappointed
Disclosure - Piramal pharma is part of my core holding
They are part of a big organization called RSM International.
I feel first quarter will be very tepid as always the case. My estimate for Q1 numbers is Revenue : 2100 Cr, EBIDTA @10% would be 200 -220 Cr. PAT will be negative as Depreciation & Interest cost per quarter is approx 300 Cr. Due to planned expansion in USA debt will be higher again
They have guided for muted FY26 overall. So, not expecting much anything this year.
I understand that. But at least losses should be minimized or no loss scenario. Due to high depreciation (continuous expansion) and interest payment (higher debt) a minimum of 300 Cr EBIDTA is required just to be at NO loss scenario. Looks like this year bottom-line would be mostly negative…Q1 for sure
Looks like PPL’s client got drug approval in June 2025 and product is scheduled to be launched in Q4-2025.
Looking at the launch date, PPL must have already supplied key ingredients to it already buy may see benefit if the product has good response.
The company has reported 17 development and manufacturing sites in its annual reports from FY23 to FY25, as well as in the rights issue prospectus.
It invested in Yapan Bio in December 2021 and increased its stake to 33.33% in April 2022. Yapan Bio’s facilities in Hyderabad are included in the company’s list of manufacturing sites, as illustrated in the following screenshot from the 2025 annual report.
However, in earlier annual reports, this Hyderabad facility was not included, as shown in the screenshot from the 2024 annual report below.
What we observe is that the Hyderabad facility was not included in annual reports before FY25, despite the company holding a stake in Yapan Bio at that time. The total number of facilities remains unchanged at 17.
Previously, there was a Thane facility listed for ‘Peptide API R&D’.
In the FY25 annual report, this Thane facility is removed, and the Hyderabad facility appears instead.
I also emailed the company’s IR team but have not received any response.
Thane facility was decommissioned unit and was sold as per notification dated 22nd July (attached). There was no income from this facility as per the announcement.
I am not sure why it was shown as Peptide R&D earlier (company may have been planning and may have changed). Hyderabad facility if owned minority stake then need not be disclosed
I feel that they should not have replaced that facility with one from Yapan Bio just to maintain the numbers.