Hariom Pipes Ltd: A Capex Play!

I reckon numbers are very soft in this qtr.
Guidance is intact.
But what’s the fundraise for, they were easily able to service the debt and CFO is hesitant in answering the reasons for fundraise.
I reckon if this qtr is soft for hariom , it may be horrible for other players.

But next few quarters don’t look good from existing shareholders perspective , due to dilution.

2 Likes

I noticed one thing from the video. The CFO in spite of not answering the reason for fund raising directly, he kept implying that the present and future CAPEX to come can be easily managed with present funds and accruals. I feel this fund raising could be for a new big project rather than addl fund requirements or wc

3 Likes

Curious to know on why these individual are not exercising their warrant. Considering current share price which is double of exercise and 25% of exercise price is already paid. Why would someone do this?

1 Like

Only explanation in my mind is the investor doesn’t have the funds to invest or they simply forgot. Malabar recently converted their warrants into equity shares in Q1 of this FY.

Company has recently shared interesting data on state wise expansion:

Few Observations

  • Growth has been very impressive and consistent
  • FY21/22/23/24 = 58%/69%/50%/79%
  • Mix has improved quite well. In 2020, business was dependent on just two state - Telangana and Karnataka contributing 64% and 22% of revenues
  • Today, the revneue is broad based across Karnataka, Telangana, TN, Kerala and Andhra

image

Dealer Network Expansion

As per Annual Report 2024, this has come on the back of good dealer network expansion:

Based on this we can analyze dealer productivity:

image

4 Likes

First Ever Concall by Hariom

Can be a Very Good Trigger

1 Like

The Q2FY25 result is extremely weak. The company promised sales CAGR of 50% over FY24-26 until Q4FY24 (mentioned in the result PPT). Interestingly, in their Q1FY25 PPT, they didnt mention any guidance. Now with a result disaster in Q2FY25, it shows what the management is upto.

2 Likes

While the results aren’t the best, the recent crash should prevent further downside. Hopefully H2 is better. It is still marginally better YoY. Nice to see that they have scheduled a con call so hope the right questions are asked. Overall I see this as flat results. The fund raise may add to existing pressure on price upwards though.

Hariom Pipe Results

Stable Set not as per Growth, but as per operation perspective

Rev Growth of 4% YoY n -9% QoQ
EBITDA Growth of 16% YoG n -7% QoQ
Margins up at 13.4% vs 11.7% YoY n 13.1% QoQ
PAT Growth of 7% YoY

OCF Strong at 53 cr vs -60.8 cr
Debt & WC Req🔻

CFO already pointed out about weak results & I feel market had already discounted it as fall more ATH is more than 30%

Good part is Strong OCF, which led to lower Debt & WC Req

With this Q about Fund Raise is a big suspense!!

Concall might give some boost or will clear many doubts

No Reco
Disc: Invested & will continue to hold

2 Likes

The result in the current quarter for all pipes companies will be subdued given the fall in steel prices, late budget and rainy season.

the steel prices have corrected by 30% to 40% from the highs leading to fall in realization of pipe making companies.

Hariom which is an integrated player makes pipe out of HR coil which has better realizations as compared to Patra Pipes so, the difference between Patra pipe & HR coil prices have now Shrinked down and now the difference is of 20% to 25% which is a good thing as the market gets more mature increased traction will be seen by HR coil Pipe manufactures as compared to Patra pipe Manufacturers due to better quality and strength.

This fall in price will lead to increased stocking leading to many pipe companies like Hi-tech pipes, JTL Industries and more posting record volume but the realizations will be more or less flattish.

this, is a short to mid term i expect that by Q3 or Q4 of this year we’ll also see reversal in steel prices and value growth along with volume growth for pipe companies.

Point to highlight:

  1. In 2020, APL Apollo the sector leader stopped selling products on credit and to this decision all players followed except hariom pipes today it is the only player in the industry that provides credit to it’s customers to me this was interesting also it is verified by debtor and creditor cycle.
  2. The Six Monthly Balance sheet attached in result of current quarter shows increase in debtors as well as the payables have grown from 19 crores to 108 crores so what can be the possible reason behind it. (one need to think of it.)

Disclaimer: Invested in the company

2 Likes

Some highlights from Earnings Call Q2FY25

  • Volumes grew +11% YoY

    • Revenue grew +6% as realisation declined -5% YoY due to reduction in end prices
    • Monsoon in South India were exceptionally disruptive this season and hence the demand was weak in the past few months - slower construction, infra build out
  • EBITDA grew +18% YoY

    • Better metric to track company is EBITDA growth and EBITDA/ton since realisations/revenue can fluctuate based on steel price; however Hariom can capture adequate EBITDA/tonn regardless of commodity price volatility
  • WC down to 58 days in H1FY25

  • OCF for H2 was +50 crores and 35 crores of debt was paid down

  • Capital Raise

    • Enabling resolution of QIP; Focus will be on specialized steel products + Geography expansion
  • Distribution

    • Have direct connect with 800 dealers in south india; don’t work with distributors
    • Work with fabricators but not directly, instead connect with local dealers
  • Guidance

    • Co has ~270kt sales target for FY25
    • In H1, 114kt volume done, so ~156kt remaining for H2
    • FY25 revenue target = 1,600 cr
    • FY26 revenue target = 2,500 cr reaffirmed; this hasn’t been changed despite weaker than expected Q2
5 Likes

Promoter Bought stake on 29th Oct

Only bought 35k shares, but still shows commitment of Promoters on Biz even after weak Q2

Concall was also seems Bullish with Guidance Intact, QIP is just an enabling resolution, CFO issues solving, Operations stabilizing, focusing on Geographical Expansion & Deleveraging + Promoters Trust on future growth

Future prospects seems promising

3 Likes

35,000 shares amounts to 2.0 crores.

Promoters increased stake by +0.11%

It is said that insiders can sell stake for many reasons, but there is only one reason for buying.

H1FY25 revenue is 657 crores. During Q2FY25 earnings call, mgmt shared guidance to get to 1,600 crore revenue in FY25.

This implies guidance of 943 crores revenue in H2FY25.

Company has done 611 crores in H2FY24 and hence promoter buying from open market could mean that they have good confidence in achieving this 50%+ revenue growth in H2?

6 Likes

Company has uploaded the earnings call transcript today. Few notable points from there:

  1. Margin and EBITDA guidance

CFO is hinting towards margins to be closer to 13.5% in FY26 and hence EBITDA potential of 337 crores in FY26

(At the same time highlighting that “But our vision is much more better, much more bigger than that”)

So maybe 13.5% is a conservative guidance on margins for FY26?

  1. EPS guidance assuming dilution of due to potential ~700 crore fund raise.
  • EPS expected for FY25 = ~30
  • EPS expected for FY26 = ~40-43 | This assumes dilution of a certain % at a certain stock price.

We need to do some math on back calculating the implied dilution % in-built in this EPS of 40-43

  • a) No dilution scenario:

    • 337 crore of FY26 EBITDA mentioned by CFO above
    • 50 crores of depreciation
    • 40 crores of interest cost
    • = expected PBT of 247 crores.
    • Assume a 27% tax rate
    • and this gives us 180 crores of PAT.
    • 3.1 crores total shares outstanding gives an approximate FY26 EPS of ~58
  • b) Dilution Scenario
    If we apply an EPS of 41.5 (mid-point of dilution scenario), on 180 crores of PAT, this assumes total shares outstanding of 4.33 crores which means ~40% dilution on share count basis

    Current Market Cap is ~1800 crores and 40% dilution means a fund raise of 1800*0.4 = 720 crores. So, basically the 40-43 EPS for dilution scenario assumes (1) QIP happens at CMP and (2) the entire 700 cr is raised and (3) No interest cost savings by debt paydown from QIP money (4) No incremental revenue or profits from incremental fund raise.


PS: There seems to be a typo in the transcript. it should read Rs. 30 for FY25 (instead of FY24).

What do others think of this calculation? Please point out any mistakes that you see.

2 Likes

Can you please help me with this calculation.
If 3.1 cr shares become 4.33 cr shares how is it 40 percent dilution

You are right thank you

Now that all pipe companies have reported Q2 numbers, here is compilation of valuation comparison based on EV/EBITDA.
Note: This is based on trailing reported numbers and doesn’t take into account future growth.


Source:Screener

If we consider CFO’s guidance of 330+ crore EBITDA in FY26, then EV/EBITDA would look like 6.9x for Hariom

6 Likes

What about equity dilution?

@SwapanBansal , thanks for your detailed analysis earlier. You have been quite passionate and very much consistent in providing the business level update for this scrip. Also thank everyone else for adding the details.

I have a few points that i want to mention here.

  1. @SwapanBansal : your analysis mention earlier as the below exhibit. Does this mean that the industry installed capacity is more than market size? I am sorry if this sound stupid question but do we have any view of estimate market size in India? ALso i see that other players are also doing capex to increase capacity what is the scenario here? I think it is important to understand this in order to be able to completely understand the 2x growth they are planning to achieve, though i do not deny their growth story.

  1. I have observed that the ROE for Hariom is just matching the other players (if not below), and main reason i can see is the asset turns for Hariom is significantly lower. All other competitors operate at >2.5x of asset turns while Hariom is <1.5. WHat is the reason for this? I can understand that this may be partially because they produce VAP as opposed to the commodity. But this may not be the sole reason behind the significantly lower asset turn. If they can achieve the same asset turns as the peers, this can be a very big game changer given that they are already working to improve PAT margin by reduction of debt. Currently they are just able to match the ROE in fact it is lower than peers) as the peers because of a little higher PAT. This is also one reason they have lower PE than peers i believe.

2 Likes

Any idea why Hi Tech pipes has a higher valuation multiple v/s Hariom despite Hariom having slightly levels of absolute PAT/EBITDA ? DII+FII ownership in Hitech is ~30% vs 10% for Hariom.