Great articles to read on the web

India EV’s and investments outlook Source: Trendlyne

In 1908 the Ford Model T set off a transportation revolution, as the first mass-produced car with an internal combustion engine (ICE). It had no seatbelts or windows, 20 horsepower (hp) and a top speed of 72 km/hr.

ICE vehicles have evolved a lot since that first car - the modern Ford GT MK IV has 40 times the power, with 800 hp and a top speed of 472 km/hr.

Before the Model T, roads across cities had to be cleaned every day of huge amounts of horse manure, because people were mostly travelling in horse carriages. The car was a relief to everyone who had to walk around while trying not to step into horse poop. Now more than a hundred years later, electric vehicles are emerging as a cleaner, better alternative to ICE vehicles.

Elon Musk, the poster boy worldwide for electric cars, made EVs a truly disruptive force with Tesla. Several auto manufacturers before him had tried to sell electric vehicles without success - small, cramped cars that nobody wanted to be seen in. Tesla paved the way for EVs to become both competitive and a status symbol.

But so far, the Indian story has been different. Despite India introducing its first domestically manufactured electric car, the Reva, in 2001, the country has lagged behind major markets in increasing electric vehicle usage.

Tata, Mahindra, Ola, Hero, and TVS have become leading electric mobility manufacturers in India. In FY23 alone, the country saw a hockey-stick change in demand, with 11,71,944 electric vehicle sales - in one year alone, sales were more than the total EVs sold in India over the past 10 years.

Fortune Business Insights expects India’s electric vehicle market to grow from $3.2 billion in 2022 to $114 billion by 2029 – a CAGR of 66.5%.

Norway has the highest EV penetration in the world right now, with 79.2%. The Norwegian government has passed legislation requiring that all cars sold in 2025 be zero-emission (electric or hydrogen-powered) vehicles. In comparison, the Indian government is far behind and is targeting to achieve 30% EV penetration by 2030.

Station shortage: 2,577 for EVs vs 80,000 for ICE

To promote electric vehicles, the Indian government has adopted a three-pronged approach by subsidizing EV consumption, building charging infrastructure across the country, and incentivizing local EV manufacturing.

Under the National Electric Mobility Mission Plan (NEMMP), the goal is to set up one charging station every three kilometres in cities, and one every 25 kilometres on highways. However, only 2,577 charging stations have been installed so far, a stark contrast to the nearly 80,000 fueling stations India has for ICE vehicles.

The government’s Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Hybrid and Electric Vehicles (FAME) scheme offers subsidies for electric vehicles. To qualify, the vehicle must have at least 70 km of range and a minimum speed of 40 km/hr. Additionally, the government has set norms requiring 50% of the vehicle’s manufacturing to be done in India. These initiatives have led to a price decline of Rs 10,000 - 15,000 for electric two-wheelers.

Data source: moneycontrol

To make lithium-ion battery packs more competitive in terms of pricing, the government has reduced the Goods and Services Tax (GST) on these batteries from 18% to 5%. The new Production Linked Incentive (PLI) programme for this industry is also expected to promote domestic battery manufacturing.

Government initiatives have shown positive results for the electric two-wheeler segment, which registered sales of 1 lakh units in May 2023. However, problems such as the lack of charging infrastructure on highways and battery limitations continue to hinder the growth of EV passenger vehicle sales.

Two-wheeler startups, auto equipment manufacturers lead the EV revolution

Electric two-wheelers account for nearly 61.5% of all EVs sold in India, followed by three-wheelers (34%) and passenger vehicles (3.4%). As two-wheelers are designed for traveling a shorter distance, the technology makes them more attractive.

Electric two-wheeler sales have captured 3.2% of India’s two-wheeler market, while the share for passenger vehicles stands at 1.6%. As of December 2022, EVs accounted for 16.8% of all vehicle sales in Delhi, marking a YoY growth of 86%.

Startups like Ola Electric (21.9%), Okinawa Autotech (15.6%), Hero Electric (12.9%) and Ampere Vehicles (12.1%) account for nearly 50% of the total two-wheeler electric vehicle sales in India.

The simplicity of electric vehicles, with fewer than 20 moving parts compared to the 2,000+ parts in IC engines, has put traditional OEM manufacturers at a disadvantage. Consequently, their focus has shifted towards technological development like sensors, software, wiring and batteries.

OEM manufacturers are signing joint ventures with electric vehicle startups to update their product portfolio. Uno Minda, for instance, has signed a JV with foreign firms to manufacture battery packs, smart plugs, residual current device (RCD) cables and motor controllers. This will enhance its kit value from the current Rs 8,000 per vehicle to Rs 50,000 per vehicle.

In the hunt for technology neutrality, Igarashi Motors is developing motors that can be used for both IC engines and electric vehicles. The firm, through a third party, supplied motor parts to Tesla for a short while.

Bosch has also been investing in the development of electric mobility solutions like battery management systems, electric axles and vehicle control units. While these have fewer takers in India, there has been a noticeable global uptick in the sales of such technology.

India struggles in battery manufacturing, lags behind China

Battery manufacturing has a crucial role in the electric vehicle industry, accounting for nearly 30-40% of the total vehicle cost. India lags behind in this key aspect, with China controlling around 75% of the battery manufacturing market. The United States, Hungary and Germany also have a significant presence in this space.

Indian firms have not made big investments in battery technology, unlike global players who are working on improving the energy density of batteries to give EVs more travel range. Some of the highest-performing battery cells – Tesla’s upcoming 4,680 cells and LG Energy Solutions’ Ultium cells – can reach energy densities of over 300 Wh/kg, up from around 100-150 Wh/kg a decade ago.

Major economies are also making rapid progress in setting up giga-factories. China has an installed capacity of 5,462 GWh for lithium-ion battery manufacturing, followed by Europe (1193 GWh) and North America (1047 GWh).

Indian firms are yet to make much headway here. Some Indian companies are taking steps now in battery manufacturing - Tata Group is developing a 20 GWh plant in Gujarat, Exide Industries plans to invest Rs 6,000 crore in a 12 GWh plant, and Amara Raja Batteries is investing around Rs 9,500 crore to set up a 16 GWh plant along with a 5 GWh plant for a battery pack assembly unit. Many non-technical players like Reliance, Amperex and OLA are betting on lithium-ion battery manufacturing by acquiring or investing in new plants.

However, the current trend suggests that battery manufacturers may struggle to scale up production to meet rising EV demand. Many Indian auto manufacturers instead import battery packs from China, assemble them domestically, and sell them under different brand names.

India’s electric vehicle ecosystem has witnessed significant growth and government support in recent years. But it still relies heavily on imports, and India needs to ramp up its battery manufacturing capabilities a lot faster. A focus on manufacturing and better charging infrastructure can reduce oil imports, and unlock the full potential of India’s electric mobility.

8 Likes

Another great video from G Maran, Unifi capital

3 Likes

Excess Returns is an investing podcast hosted by Justin Carbonneau and Jack Forehand, partners at Validea. They have had some great guests and some great discussions. But over 3 years, I would think they have talked to guests for more than 140 hours of discussions.

Recently they came out with a summary of the advice given out by 70 of their guests.

3 Likes

2 Likes

Self Explanatory!

4 Likes

MEGATRENDS: DEFINING
INDIA’S CHEMICAL INDUSTRY :–

This Report compiled more than 75
interviews, columns, and overviews covering Chemicals, Petrochemicals, Energy, Digitalization, Supply Chain
& Logistics, and Sustainability giving a complete 360 degree view. The interviews/columns and forewords are
from industry stalwarts in chemical manufacturing, industry associations, academia, R&D organizations, supply
chain & logistics, and digitalization & automation sectors and provide a holistic view.
The interviews/columns focus on global and Indian trends, policy, green chemistry, circular economy,
sustainability, Net Zero, etc.
The Indian Chemicals and Petrochemicals industry is forecast to grow from US $220 billion in 2022 to US $304
billion by 2025 and US $1,000 billion by 2040. The chemical companies based in India are looking to become
Aatmanirbhar and so are focusing on both forward and backward integration. Not only this, companies are
expanding their existing brownfield capacities and building greenfield capacities in a big way by leveraging on
China+1 and Europe+1 opportunities. All this is good for India and we need to work with an integrated approach
so that all segments benefits in this process.

9 Likes

Thank God for the Internet!

https://www.portfolioyoga.com/wp/reminiscences-of-the-past/

3 Likes

A report by IEA(International Energy Agency) on LiFE lessons from India
The benefits of advancing the Lifestyle for Environment (LiFE) initiative through the G20.

  • The Lifestyle for Environment (LiFE) initiative was launched by Prime Minister Narendra
    Modi of India at COP26 in Glasgow in November 2021. It aims to encourage the adoption
    of sustainable lifestyles in India and internationally to tackle the challenges of
    environmental degradation and climate change.
  • India has integrated several policies in its energy transition strategy that are aligned with
    LiFE.
  • India’s economy is already 10% more energy efficient than both the global and G20
    average. India took less time to go from half to full electricity access than other major
    economies.
  • Already the third largest national market globally for renewables, India has recently seen
    the growth of consumer-centric solutions like distributed solar PV take off, with rooftop
    solar growing 30-fold in less than a decade. Supportive policies and awareness campaigns
    in India have also driven electric passenger vehicles to a market share of almost 5% in
    2022 – with sales tripling from 2021.
  • India’s example shows the importance of behavioural change and consumption choices in
    driving energy transitions. The IEA has analysed the impact of measures like those
    proposed by the LiFE initiative, such as buying an EV or taking public transport, as part of
    comprehensive energy transition strategies.
  • According to the IEA’s modelling, the adoption worldwide of the kinds of actions and
    measures targeted by LiFE – including behavioural changes and sustainable consumer
    choices – would reduce annual global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by more than
    2 billion tonnes (Gt) in 2030.
  • This is about one-fifth of the emissions reductions needed by 2030 to put the world on a
    pathway to net zero emissions.
  • We estimate that around 60% of the emissions saving by LiFE measures could be directly
    influenced or mandated by governments. How individuals behave and choose to consume
    is shaped by the norms, policies, incentives and infrastructure around them.
  • Thus, although the measures envisaged in LiFE are carried out by individuals, there is a
    clear role for governments to simultaneously provide a supportive policy framework.
  • LiFE measures would also save consumers globally around USD 440 billion in 2030,
    according to the IEA’s modelling, equivalent to around 5% of all spending on fuels across
    the global economy that year.
  • LiFE measures also help lower inequalities in energy consumption and emissions between
    countries. The reductions in per capita CO2 emissions in advanced economies by 2030
    (relative to a ‘business-as-usual’ trajectory) are three- to four-times greater than in
    emerging market and developing economies.
  • India’s first G20 Presidency could strengthen the LiFE initiative by anchoring it in the G20’s
    current framing of energy transitions and initiating processes to gather experience and best
    practices of policies and programmes that G20 members are already conducting.

LiFElessonsfromIndia.pdf (2.7 MB)

1 Like

Source: Will India Surpass China to Become the Next Global Superpower?

Will India Surpass China to Become the Next Superpower?

Four inconvenient truths make this scenario unlikely.

JUNE 24, 2023, 7:00 AM

India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi, wearing a dark tunic with white long-sleeved shirt under it, gives a thumbs up sign from behind a podium and teleprompter at an Indian cultural event in Sydney on May 23.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi attends an Indian cultural event in Sydney on May 23, on the heels of his participation in the G-7 summit in Japan. LISA MAREE WILLIAMS/GETTY IMAGES

When India overtook China in April to become the world’s most populous nation, observers wondered: Will New Delhi surpass Beijing to become the next global superpower? India’s birth rate is almost twice that of China. And India has outpaced China in economic growth for the past two years—its GDP grew 6.1 percent last quarter, compared with China’s 4.5 percent. At first glance, the statistics seem promising.

This question has only become more relevant as Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi meets with U.S. President Joe Biden in Washington this week. From a U.S. perspective, if India—the world’s largest democracy—really could trump China, that would be something to shout about. India is China’s natural adversary; the two countries share more than 2,000 miles of disputed, undemarcated border, where conflict breaks out sporadically. The bigger and stronger China’s competitors are in Asia, the greater the prospects for a balance of power favorable to the United States.

Yet before inhaling the narrative of a rapidly rising India too deeply, we should pause to reflect on four inconvenient truths.

First, analysts have been wrong about India’s rise in the past. In the 1990s, analysts trumpeted a growing, youthful Indian population that would drive economic liberalization to create an “economic miracle.” One of the United States’ most thoughtful India analysts, journalist Fareed Zakaria, noted in a recent column in the Washington Post that he found himself caught up in the second wave of this euphoria in 2006, when the World Economic Forum in Davos heralded India as the “world’s fastest-growing free market democracy” and the then-Indian trade minister said that India’s economy would shortly surpass China’s. Although India’s economy did grow, Zakaria points out that these predictions didn’t come true.

Second, despite India’s extraordinary growth over the past two years—when India joined the club of the world’s five largest economies—India’s economy has remained much smaller than China’s. In the early 2000s, China’s manufacturing, exports, and GDP were about two to three times larger than India’s. Now, China’s economy is about five times larger, with a GDP of $17.7 trillion versus India’s GDP of $3.2 trillion.

Third, India has been falling behind in the race to develop science and technology to power economic growth. China graduates nearly twice as many STEM students as India. China spends 2 percent of its GDP on research and development, while India spends 0.7 percent. Four of the world’s 20 biggest tech companies by revenue are Chinese; none are based in India. China produces over half of the world’s 5G infrastructure, India just 1 percent. TikTok and similar apps created in China are now global leaders, but India has yet to create a tech product that has gone global. When it comes to producing artificial intelligence (AI), China is the only global rival to the United States. China’s SenseTime AI model recently beat OpenAI’s GPT on key technical performance measures; India has no entry in this race. China holds 65 percent of the world’s AI patents, compared with India’s 3 percent. China’s AI firms have received $95 billion in private investment from 2013 through 2022 versus India’s $7 billion. And top-tier AI researchers hail primarily from China, the United States, and Europe, while India lags behind.

Fourth, when assessing a nation’s power, what matters more than the number of its citizens is the quality of its workforce. China’s workforce is more productive than India’s. The international community has rightly celebrated China’s “anti-poverty miracle” that has essentially eliminated abject poverty. In contrast, India continues to have high levels of poverty and malnutrition. In 1980, 90 percent of China’s 1 billion citizens had incomes below the World Bank’s threshold for abject poverty. Today, that number is approximately zero. Yet more than 10 percent of India’s population of 1.4 billion continue to live below the World Bank extreme poverty line of $2.15 per day. Meanwhile, 16.3 percent of India’s population was undernourished in 2019-21, compared with less than 2.5 percent of China’s population, according to the most recent United Nations State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World report. India also has one of the worst rates of child malnutrition in the world.

Fortunately, the future does not always resemble the past. But as a sign in the Pentagon warns: Hope is not a plan. While doing whatever it can to help Modi’s India realize a better future, Washington should also reflect on the assessment of Asia’s most insightful strategist. The founding father and long-time leader of Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew, had great respect for Indians. Lee worked with successive Indian prime ministers, including Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi, hoping to help them make India strong enough to be a serious check on China (and thus provide the space required for his small city-state to survive and thrive).

But as Lee explained in a series of interviews published in 2014, the year before his death, he reluctantly concluded that this was not likely to happen. In his analysis, the combination of India’s deep-rooted caste system that was an enemy of meritocracy, its massive bureaucracy, and its elites’ unwillingness to address the competing claims of its multiple ethnic and religious groups led him to conclude that it would never be more than “the country of the future”—with that future never arriving. Thus, when I asked him a decade ago specifically whether India could become the next China, he answered directly: “Do not talk about India and China in the same breath.”

Since Lee offered this judgment, India has embarked on an ambitious infrastructure and development agenda under a new leader and demonstrated that it can achieve considerable economic growth. Yet while we can remain hopeful that this time could be different, I, for one, suspect Lee wouldn’t bet on it.

13 Likes

Ministry of mines (GoI) published a list of 30 critical minerals:

https://mines.gov.in/admin/storage/app/uploads/649d4212cceb01688027666.pdf

Finally, there is keen focus on REEs

5 Likes

Source: Finshots by Zerodha

The Story

If you want to bet on the price of oil, what do you do?

And let’s suppose you don’t want to deal with the logistics of storing and transporting oil in massive barrels. You just want to profit off of the price movement. Nothing else. If this is you, there’s really only one place to go if you want to execute this bet — the Multi Commodity Exchange (MCX)*. It’s just like BSE or NSE. They help you buy and sell stocks. On MCX, you can deal in oil, metals like gold, and even agricultural stuff like cotton. And here they have a virtual monopoly commanding over 90% market share.

Now who doesn’t love a monopoly, right? Especially one where everything seems to be trending in the right direction. As per HDFC Securities, the number of active unique clients has soared from 3.5 million in 2020 to over 10.5 million today. And the average daily trading volume of these commodity options contracts has soared from just ₹2,300 crores to ₹52,600 crores during this period too. The more the clients trade, the more money MCX will make.

So the stock price must be soaring, right?

Well, not quite. And that’s partly because of a software roadblock. See, if you’re an exchange facilitating all these bets, the one thing that you do need is solid software. It’s mission critical. Because even if there’s a minor glitch during trading, it can result in massive losses to the folks who’re trading.

Now the issue here is that MCX doesn’t have its own software. It relies on a third-party company called 63 Moons Technologies to run the show. It pays 63 Moons a fixed fee and even a percentage share of revenues for the tech. And the unfortunate reality is that nearly 30–40% of MCX’s expenses are classified as software costs. That’s a lot of money that’s just being given away.

Now you might think that’s a bit weird. Why on earth would MCX hand over one of the most critical parts of its operations to someone else?

Well, there’s a reason behind this. And we bet it’ll shock you!

There’s something you should know about 63 Moons. It has a past life and it’s trying to escape it. A time when it used to go by the name Financial Technologies India Ltd (FTIL). And back then, FTIL wasn’t just a software company. It was actually a software company that ran a few commodity exchanges — there was one called NSEL and another…well, MCX.

Yup, the folks behind 63 Moons were the founders of MCX.

But everything unravelled for FTIL somewhere around 2013. People uncovered a mammoth scam at NSEL. The exchange was playing fast and loose with the rules. There was rampant misselling. And customers were being defrauded. When all this came to light, FTIL was forced to relinquish control of MCX.

Rakesh Jhunjhunwala and Kotak Mahindra Bank stepped in to pick up the pieces. And to rid itself of its sins, FTIL soon changed its name to 63 Moons.

Anyway, because FTIL founded MCX way back in 2003, it simply used its own software to get the commodity exchange up and running. And there’s nothing wrong with that. But you can imagine that after FTIL’s implosion, investors weren’t pleased that it continued to hold the keys to the software contract. Everyone wanted MCX to look for options. And in 2021, MCX finally picked Tata Consultancy Services to do the job. It expected things to go smoothly and be ready for launch in its new avatar within a year. Because TCS has all this vast experience, no?

But it didn’t quite work out as imagined. The software still isn’t ready. The mock trading sessions have been cancelled a couple of times. And the timeline for implementation keeps getting postponed. Again. And again. And again.

What this means is that 63 Moons knows that MCX has no option. It knows that MCX can’t do anything with its software at the moment. And that means they can squeeze MCX for all its worth. And we mean that literally.

See, before TCS entered the picture, 63 Moons played nice. They charged around ₹16 crores per quarter from MCX for tech support. But when the first request for an extension came about in September 2022, they upped it to ₹67 crores. The second time around, it went higher to ₹87 crores. And now, it’s going to be ₹125 crores per quarter. For context, brokerages expect that MCX will earn revenues of around ₹550 crores this year (FY24). And that means, just extending the darn software contract by a couple of quarters could eat away half of what the commodity exchange will earn.

So yeah, 63 Moons has most certainly grabbed this opportunity with both hands.

But here’s the funniest part of the story. 63 Moons sent a letter to the stock exchange about this development. And it didn’t pull any punches.

Sample this: “We have once again agreed to the eleventh-hour request by MCX, which according to MCX is for the ‘last time’ for one more time.”

Or this line — “We sincerely wish that this ‘last time’ really happens someday, so that we deploy our excellent team of exchange technology engineering group in mega promising opportunity in new digital world.”

And finally this — “As the founders and well-wishers of MCX, we wish them good luck with these new experiments and hope that they will reach the right destination one day.”

Sarcastic, much?

Now when you read this, we won’t blame you for thinking that the tech company was doing MCX a favour. But here’s the thing. It looks like 63 Moons is actually quite dependent on MCX too. The commodity exchange is probably their biggest customer — if you do the math, you’ll realize that out of the ₹112 crores they earned in the final quarter of FY23 (Jan-March ‘23), nearly 80% of it was thanks to the MCX deal.

So why this sarcasm, 63 Moons? Haven’t the old wounds healed yet?

Either way, MCX will move on. It’ll get the new software from TCS up and running. Hopefully sooner rather than later. And investors can put this behind them and enjoy the money this commodity monopoly truly can deliver. But till it actually happens, it’s quite hard to see why the stock price should see any sort of rally.

13 Likes

Very insightful report from WHO on ‘Emerging technologies and scientific innovations’

Report link: 2023 emerging technologies and scientific innovations: a global public health perspective

4 Likes
1 Like

Mentions the criteria used for categorization of companies across

Special Situations — Emerging Leader ---- Almost Clear Leader — Clear Leader

Yasho is the new bet in specialty chemicals

They also mentioned that Westlife is a superior franchise and they don’t contest that.

Glad to read whatever Solidarity posts.

7 Likes

Vinod Khosla looks at grim events of the recent past through an optimistic lens

5 Likes

A very good listen

10 Likes

Chor Bane Mor is completely debunked as a theme/theory. More people have lost money due to this dubious theory than anything else in the last 10 years. People don’t change so easily and Chor are likely to remain Chor as long as same incentives remain in place. Lot of pump and dump happened using this dubious theory.
The person who coined this term has done great disservice to the investment community.

3 Likes

Balaji is incredibly smart and well-read; was a real pleasure listening to him…

Here are some notes I took…which not at all do justice to this interview –

What is happening with the Fiat Crisis?

  • Sometimes the long run is now; it’s not a fire drill this time

  • Multiple shocks coming at the same time: financial, political, technological

  • Financial shock: govt sold assets and then consciously devalued them bankrupting banks. Banks have $2.7 trillion in unrealized losses. People are being misled about the banking crisis.

Balaji’s equivalent premises

  • Premise 1: Can US govt print infinite money?

  • Premise 2: Does US govt have an invincible military?

  • Both look different but they are same: if #1 is true then you can fund #2

  • “Dollar nationalists” believe both 1 and 2 are true

  • Fiat currencies are backed by men with guns (Paul Krugman)

God, State, Network

  • What’s most powerful: almighty God OR State OR encryption (network)

  • Civic religion: constitution is venerated like a scripture

Hyperpower wars 1991-2021

  • Ukraine was a “rebound” war after Afghanistan

  • Ukraine war: China is a player at the table backing Russia

  • 85% of the world continues to trade with Russia so it’s not choked out…

  • Fact that Blinken is negotiating with China shows America’s weakness

Conspiracy theories

  • I am not interested in your conspiracy theories tell me about your successful conspiracy practice

  • Opposite of Conspiracy theory is “the official story”

  • There is only apathy and panic…never calm preparation

  • One man’s conspiracy theory is another man’s shelling point (coordination without coordination)

Russia vs Japan

  • Japanese beat Russia in 1905, becoming the first non-white power beat a white power

  • Japan became the champion of anti-colonialism for decades

  • Japan was a strange mix of far right imperialist and far left anti-colonialists

  • Russia’s loss in the 1905 war was a huge humiliation…they made their #1 priority of the foreign policy to pit US against Japan. Russia used its spy network to precipitate the fight between Japan and the US in WW2

  • 1905 Russia-Japan is one the most important and the most underdiscussed events on the 20th century

View on China

  • Ferocious adversary

  • China makes 14x more steel than US

  • “China would be Congo if US hadn’t sent the jobs there in the 70s” — that’s right wing version of the left wing fallacy…left wing fallacy is “rich are rich because poor are poor”…right wing fallacy is “other countries are rich because American made them rich”

Microsoft vs FB vs Google

  • MS gave 1 B to FB in 2007 to fight Google

  • Similarly, the US was a VC in China in the 70s because they wanted to create a bulwark against Russia

America and India

  • History is running in reverse…India is becoming more like the US of 1950s…and US is more like the India of 90s

  • America has a group of highly intelligent people ruled by a dysfunctional state…racked by communal violence and socialists…India is God and country America of 50s…

Blue America is at war with the world

  • Elite democrats aka Blue America are ~1% of the world population and they are at war with he rest 99%

  • In last 10 years they fought all out conflicts against Tech, Trump, China, Russia, and also alienated India, Israel, Saudi, Brazil and France

  • They now suck at diplomacy and propaganda which used to be their forte

  • They went from “winning everywhere without fighting to fighting everywhere without winning”

11 Likes