Understanding Bandhan Bank better
(notes from conference call July 2019)
No recommendation. Only for educational purpose.
- Concern: Risk of over leveraging in Eastern Region. Risk of NPA’s rising.
Over 99% on-time repayment (OTR) by customers i.e. customer repays loan on exact date of repayment without any delay
Around 55% of MFI customers are in three cycle plus by number (65% in terms of value). Borrowing & repaying loan is considered as one cycle. Positive track record of borrowers
About 55% customers are unique to Bandhan i.e. they have not borrowed from any other MFI (better monitoring of over leveraging issue)
- Concern: Concentration on Eastern Region
About 46% of loan book is from West Bengal. However, it must be remembered that Bandhan started operations from West Bengal. Captive customers & high cycle borrowers. Loan size is increasing to them
To de-risk, all new branches will be opened outside West Bengal; 80% of new micro finance customers are from non-eastern region
- Concern: CASA ratio has fallen over last quarter
Bandhan offering longer tenor fixed deposits at high interest rates to match Gruh’s longer tenor lending. There has been some shift from CASA to fixed deposit by customers.
- Concern: Are microfinance customers overborrowing & depositing in saving account to create high CASA for Bandhan?
Retail deposits contribute 76% of total deposits while microfinance customers contribute only 6% of deposits.
- Concern: How can anyone borrow at such high rates and expect to pay back the loan?
Microfinance loans are unsecured. Small ticket size (average loan Rs 39,500). Tenor of 1 to 2 years. Other option - borrow from local moneylender who will be charging over 20%+ if not more. Bandhan has also dropped rates to less than 18% (lowest & way below other MFI’s)
Difficult for banks to service such small ticket loans. Operating costs high. Unsecured loans.
Other risks/uncertainties remain
a) Government regulation on maximum lending rate
b) Loan waiver by government destroys credit discipline
c) Equity dilution overhang; Gruh merger will reduce promoter holding to 61%; Need to bring it down to 40%
Call ended with guidance of 35%-40% growth in FY2020