Ugro Capital - Opportunity To Invest in a Fintech-like Company Below Book Value

Thanks for sharing the interview. There is a lot to learn if we take this with the earnings call that happened a few days ago. As I’m relying on memory, please double check all statements with the transcript when released.

What was the impact of the second wave?

Mr. Pandey tells us that out of the 8 sectors that they’ve chosen, education and hospitality were impacted the most due to the pandemic. This translates to 25% of their loan book, but is more nuanced since different channels (Tier I vs Tier IV towns) saw different impacts from the pandemic.

On the concall, they told us that bounce rates were up in late April and May, there was a drop in collection efficiency, and they are expecting a pick up from July onwards. This is in line with what other NBFCs have been saying, and Mr. Pandey expects education to pick up once schools open, as expansion plans have been deferred for a long time.

As far as the Sanjeevani loans go, it shouldn’t worry us as much as if they said they’re suddenly handing out the high yield GRO Micro loans.

On the concall, Mr. Nath explained his take on why small finance banks like Equitas and Ujjivan ran into problems with unsecured loans, and how they’re making sure to keep a check on this through position sizing.

What are they planning going ahead?

On the concall, they explained that they want to be patient with their new offerings that are coming into play (co lending with ICICI/SBI) and don’t want to make the mistake of being aggresive before we know a definite answer on the possibility of a future third wave.

A question often discussed in this thread is whether they really have a technology moat. The takeaway I got from both the concall and this interview with Mr. Pandey is that we should look at them as having a people / management moat. On the concall, they mentioned not wanting to replace a CEO going forward, but they want to bring in sectoral specialists that truly understand the nuances of the areas where they work. The interview echoed this because Mr. Pandey came across as someone aware of how the various sectors catered to by NBFCs have been hit in general, not just the 8 Ugro focuses on. He speaks about how financial institutions are rigid with their models and miss the nuances within the subsectors(healthcare was the example in the interview). He also explained how they’re evolving their process of underwriting(parts of hospitality won’t exist), and working to really understand the forward cash flows of the SMEs they lend to, rather than simply looking at previous revenue and payment/default history.

Given that we’re now in for two back to back Ugro meetings, with the Q1FY22 earnings call on the 11th of August, and the AGM on the 1st of September, Mr. Nath’s going to have to work very hard to spin two more 30 minute speeches out of the investor presentation. :slight_smile:

Personally, I like that they’ve given targets for FY25:

  • AUM of 25,000 Cr.
  • Disbursals of 11,900 Cr.
  • 16.3% interest yield.
  • 9.5% borrowing costs.
  • 8.5% NIMs.
  • 4.2% RoA.
  • 18.8% RoE.
  • 3.8x Debt / Equity

I’ve written before in the thread that they have very real default conditions on the NCDs they’ve given out, so those triggers serve as proper monitorables going forward.

Disclosure: Invested and biased.

3 Likes

There is no doubt on management’s plan or business strategy but if 3rd wave hits india, it may be a great impact on their balance sheet and future plans…

Better to be in wait and watch mode for me…

Disc: tracking

Hospitality is severely impacted, surprised to know about education sector because schools continue to collect fee for imparting education online, what could have impacted are the auxiliary services like bus pick up, canteens, books and stationary etc. Not sure if I am missing something. Hospitality might take time.
Disc: Invested 6 percent

1 Like

Thanks all for the inputs on the thread. Few basic questions:

  1. Screener shows promoters shareholding is 2.88%. No skin in the game
  2. Consistently negative tax for the past 3 years?
  3. Consistent dilution of share capital.
  4. Close to 4.71% is held by a maritius based co under FII. This co. just holds Ugro and one more company…

If anyone can through some light on the same. Thanks.

My investment in Ugro has gone slightly above 10 percent. Started spending more time on this company.
4 in 5 Americans have never defaulted on a credit product, yet less that half have access to prime credit, reference About Upstart - Online Lending Platform - Online Loans Through Upstart
This piece of information prompted me to research more on this topic, surprisingly in 2019 TransUnion CIBIL has published their findings on a study they carried out on MSME lending by banks and NBFCs. The article (appended below) states that Peak NPA rates in MSME is 3.26 percent at quarter 14 from origination. For PSU banks, MSME NPA is 5.1 percent. Regarding NBFCs, the article states the peak NPA is 3.1 percent (with additional industry filters and UGro’s digital analysis, my guestimate is 1.5 to 2.0 percent NPA.
Critical period in MSME credit is first 3.5 years, but this behavior is changing for some lenders - The Economic Times (indiatimes.com)
Companies following similar models exist at other places

IMO, comparative number will not be very different from the above pic
Disc: My views are biased, invested 10+ percent, would classify as a very risky investment

Please read full thread to understand that. All answered above.

Can anyone explain how Pratham will benefit Ugro?

At lending rate mentioned around 8% which is higher than cost of capital for Ugro, how can it make profits? Even if they lends at around 10 11%, NIMs would be quite less…

Does it mean that Ugro will get funds from BOB at less than 8% for co-lending?

UGRO will lend only 20% of the amount. The rest of the 80% of the loan will be given by BOB.

So, if the 100% loan is given, say @10% and the decided rate between UGRO & BOB is say, 8%, then UGRO will earn 2% on the 80% in the form of Commission (+) whatever NIM it will earn on the 20% loan it provided.

Source : Page 46 of the QIV FY21 Investor presentation.

Capture

11 Likes

Ugro has released their annual report for the year 2021. 8b2eee8c-b4f0-4622-9898-22b341239a7f.pdf (bseindia.com)
The goal is to capture 1% market share of the total MSME lending market by 2025,
AUM at the end of March 31st 2021 is Rs 1317. Mentioned sector wise strategy to improve business. Details on sourcing of funds was not very clear in the AR
Disc: invested up to 10 percent, my opinion is biased

1 Like

Info: Abakkus Growth Fund-1 (sunil singhania) has exited from mostly all its position, last sale was in 1st week of August, they entered in Oct 2020.

1 Like

I have invested in Ugro primarily because the story seemed interesting and the big risk was execution - I now find myself in a situation where I have pulled the trigger and now doing post-facto diligence and tracking whether the execution is playing out.

I had a couple of questions and I was trying to figure out what the right way to look at is - would be grateful if anyone can clarify as well.

  1. Governance - this has been a key investment highlight that has been pitched by the management. One of the item is that there is a mandatory requirement for a Big 4 firm to be appointed as the statutory and internal auditor (see page 39 of https://www.ugrocapital.com/sites/default/files/2019-03/U%20Gro%20Capital%20-%20Investor%20Presentation.pdf)

Well, subsequently Deloitte resigned as statutory auditor in Aug 20 and subsequently MSKA was appointed as Statutory Auditor (I don’t know much about MSKA, they might be very good - but they are not a big 4) - https://www.ugrocapital.com/sites/default/files/2020-08/Outcome%20of%20Board%20Meeting%20-%2012.08.2020.pdf

My general question is how ‘mandatory’ are such requirements and more importantly why did Deloitte resign in the middle of the financial year?

  1. Projecting Capital requirements - The management has a target of ~20000 Cr+ AUM / loan book by about 2025-2026. These can be funded by either debt or equity - the company has ~900Cr. equity and have availed some debt recently but their long term gearing target is 3.5x. So my question is how do we project how much equity capital is required or determine whether the current equity base is sufficient to grow the loan book to 20,000 Cr. assuming a gearing cap of 3.5x and a CRAR assumption of ~20% (say)?

The aspect I find tricky here is to assess the capital factoring in the CRAR as a constraint - if it is only a gearing ratio, then each year we can assume a NIM that will accrete to equity and then 3.5x that equity amount will be the max capital available for lending.

  1. The Q1 2022 results have just been released (https://www.bseindia.com/xml-data/corpfiling/AttachLive/79f2f3e3-e588-4cb6-a3ad-fcd991809f16.pdf). At first glance, I think it is probably Covid related impact - their impairment charges are up ~4x compared to Q12021. My question here is regarding a disclosure on Page 2 (NOTE 5) - details of financial assets sold to Securitisation / Reconstruction Company.

The aggregate value of account sold to SC/RC - 18.42 Cr.
Aggregate Consideration - 17.05 Cr.
Aggregate Gain/ (loss) over net book value - 1.38 Cr.

Should the Aggregate amount above be a loss of 1.38Cr instead of Gain? Since the consideration received is less than the aggregate value of the accounts sold.

  1. My understanding was that the average ticket size of loans is relatively small - but in Page 3 (NOTE 5), the number of accounts restructured is 27 with an aggregate exposure of ~20.96 Cr. This would imply that the average ticket size is ~77 lakhs. While this is much higher than what management has indicated, the concern I am trying to address is again one of governance, adherence to protocols, guidance etc.

As I mentioned, I am trying to still evaluate this company better - so any pointers will be much appreciated.

Cheers!

6 Likes

Hi,

Thanks for all the points. New angles are always appreciated to understand our businesses better. :slight_smile:

Deloitte and PwC were the statutory and internal auditors until late last year, when they resigned citing Ugro not paying them enough.

From the past 3 annual reports, the fees paid to Deloitte were:

FY19: 12 lakhs
FY20: 51.28 lakhs
FY21: 69 lakhs (annualised)

The investor presentations from 2021 subsequently cited the following:

image

The change was also presented at the last AGM, and passed through voting. None of the PE firms backing Ugro voted against it, please see the voting results at this link.

MSKA are also the auditors for HDFC Bank, but you’re right that they aren’t a big 4. Ugro is currently paying them 31.8 lakhs annualised.


On your fourth point, it’s likely that the accounts were of a high ticket size. They’ve given out the limits for all of their loans in the investor presentation, and these fall within those limits. While the average loan size on average is around 20 lakhs, it’s composed of a basket of different sizes.

image

I would guess that these accounts were through the second channel.

4 Likes

The reasons for performance slightly below expectations does not deserve any explanation, April, May months were devastating for the entire country. With in the situation, considering the size and the early stage of the company am not disappointed.

4th point in referred RBI circular Reserve Bank of India - Index To RBI Circulars states this facility is provided to borrowers who faced stress due to covid, once things improve, hope these will not become NPA
Let us hear what management has to say during tomorrow’s call

2 Likes

what are the NPA nos? why it isn’t declared in results?

Investor presentation. NPA numbers are 2.3%/1.9% (GNPA/NNPA)

3 Likes
2 Likes
1 Like

When the company is digital focused why should they hire more headcount bringing down revenue per person. Sachindra in his previous webcast mentioned that they plan to make it a pure digital company where potential borrowers would apply on line by sharing all the required information.
Is the business in 34 locations covering 2000 pin codes saturated. My concern about hiring is, more people will create more complex issues
Disc: Invested more than 10 percent, risky investment