Jindal Drilling - Beneficiary of a sustained offshore upcycle?

About the company

Jindal Drilling is an upstream oil and gas services provider in the offshore oil and gas segment. It provides offshore rig services to exploration and production companies like ONGC. Jindal Drilling is promoted by the DP Jindal Group (https://www.jindal.com/) who also own Maharashtra Seamless.

Jindal Drilling currently operates 5 jack-up rigs in India with ONGC. It owns one more rig via a JV which is currently deployed in Mexican waters and is being operated by Saipem. Of the 5 rigs Jindal Drilling operates, 2 rigs are owned and the rest are rented. The company makes the best EBITDA margins on owned rigs as there is no rental cost involved.

Details of Jindal Drilling’s rigs are given below

Rigs are contracted out to E&P (exploration and production) companies on a daily charter rate basis which are denominated in USD. The current day charter rates for these contracts are as follows

Jindal Supreme and Jindal Virtue I have been re-contracted recently with ONGC at much higher rates than previously while the other rigs are still on the last contract cycle rates.

Jindal Drilling’s fleet of rigs are benign shallow water jack-up rigs. These rigs can be deployed up to a maximum seabed depth of 300-350ft. All of Jindal’s rigs are deployed in the Western offshore basin of India except for Jindal Pioneer which is deployed in Mexican waters. As can be seen from the table above, Jindal’s fleet is quite modern except for Jindal Supreme. Jack-up rigs have a typical life of 30-40 years which can be enhanced by significant periodic rehaul and refurbishments (as in the case of Jindal Supreme). Modern rigs have lower operating and maintenance costs and are more readily acceptable by E&P companies such as ONGC.

I think Jindal Drilling has strong near-term earnings spike visibility which can sustain for several years if the global demand-supply dynamics in the upstream offshore oil and gas segment remains as robust as it is right now. There seem to be structural supply dynamics in place which favour an extended upcycle for upstream oil and gas service providers. Detailed industry dynamics and outlook will be discussed below.

Offshore oil and gas Industry landscape

The oil and gas industry has gone through severely tough times in the last decade. Oil prices saw tremendous strength between 2011-2014, with prices consistently sustaining beyond 100$/barrel. This bull cycle led to a lot of overinvestments in the industry with little regard for capital efficiency or outlook.

This bull cycle for oil was punctured for good in 2014-15 when US shale oil production started hitting new highs due to advances in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling. US oil production zoomed from 5.5mn barrels/day in 2011 to almost 10mn barrels/day by 2015.

This resulted in a massive oversupply of oil into a slowing global economy. To make things worse, OPEC decided to maintain its production levels to retain market share instead of cutting production to stabilize oil prices. This supply glut caused oil to plunge to 35$/barrel in Dec 2015. Just as oil prices were starting to recover and stabilize around the 70$/barrel mark after 2018, Covid hit and brought the entire oil and gas industry to its knees.

The offshore oil and gas industry is especially susceptible to such sustained downturns in oil prices because it’s a very capital heavy industry. An offshore jack-up rig which can be deployed in ocean depths of up to 400ft costs can cost between 180-220mn USD. Semi-submersible rigs which can drill at depths of 1500-3000ft can cost as much as 500mn USD and drill-ships which can drill at depths of 10000ft can cost as high as 800mn USD.

During this extended downcycle from late 2014 to 2021, the offshore rig industry went through very tough times. Some of the largest global offshore rig companies went through bankruptcy post Covid such as Valaris, Seadrill, Noble Corporation, Diamond Drilling, Pacific Drilling etc. There were also a host of mergers as the industry consolidated. This period saw many offshore rigs being cold stacked (complete deactivation of rigs to save running costs; It takes considerable time and capital to get cold stacked rigs back up to working condition) and many older rigs getting scrapped as the higher maintenance costs stopped making sense. Jack-up rig day rates plunged from 150k USD/day to 40k USD/day and the global jack-up rigs fleet utilization dropped from the high 80%s to low 50%s.

Since 2021, the oil and gas market seems to have come into better balance. Offshore spending by E&P companies has been steadily rising since 2021 with Middle East, Asia Pacific and Latin America taking the lead. Offshore spending on oil and gas is expected to be robust for the upcoming years with relative stability in global oil prices and maturing US shale production which has high oilfield decline rates.

Drilling and well services comprise about 46% of the total global offshore spending.

The painful 7-year downcycle and the rise of renewables in the 2010s has caused some fundamental changes in the capital deployment approach of E&P companies. Earlier, in the early 2010s, E&P companies were happy to overspend and undertake exploration projects which were remunerative on return on capital basis. Since going through the downcycle and an industry-wide consolidation and bankruptcies, oil and gas E&P companies are now far more discerning about the projects they choose to invest in. You will see most companies in the oil and gas upstream value chain talk about return on capital and return of cash to shareholders in their investor concalls and annual reports. The lingering uncertainty about future oil demand in the wake of the renewables boom has also caused upstream companies to be very cautious with new capital deployment.

This change in attitude has brought a lot of discipline to the supply of upstream oil and gas assets such as drilling rigs. This seems to be structural in nature and if it persists for the medium term (3-5 years), then existing working-condition assets in the upstream oil and gas space should see limited supply and therefore strong charter rates.

While there are lingering concerns over the near-term price of crude oil, it is interesting to note that ~90% of P50 offshore oil reserves are profitable if crude oil price is above 60$/barrel in the medium term. P50 oil reserves are those where the probability of actual oil reserves exceeding the estimated reserves is expected to be 50%. Thus, unless oil prices see a sustained downturn below 60$/barrel, E&P companies are unlikely to stop or curtail their offshore well drilling plans.

This suggests that barring a Covid like event, the offshore oil and gas drilling industry maybe in a structural upcycle for the medium term.

Jack-up rigs market landscape

The global supply of jack-up rigs is around 471 nos. at present. This number has been steady over the last decade and is expected to remain in a similar range through the rest of the current decade.

Although the nos have remained similar over a decade, the quality of the global fleet has improved with a bulk of the current fleet now having capability to drill beyond 300ft depth.

There have been practically no new jack-up rig orders placed with shipyards since the last cycle peak in 2015. The total no. of rigs undergoing construction as of late 2023, was 20 in number. These are expected to come into supply over the next few years. However, they represent less than 5% of the existing fleet size of 471 and are therefore not expected to impact supply dynamics materially at all. This is in sharp contrast to the previous cycle peak in 2013-2014 when 120 newbuild orders were placed with shipyards.

Due to the persistent underinvestment in new jack-up rigs over the last decade, 30% of the current fleet is over 35 years old and is nearing end of life. This means that 30% of the current fleet may not be in contention for a lot of new contracts which demand modern rigs with higher specifications.

The tight supply conditions illustrated above, coupled with steady offshore E&P demand has resulted in utilization rates for offshore rigs going up significantly.

Out of the total fleet of 471 jack-up rigs, 59 are cold stacked and only 412 are actively marketed globally at present. The utilization rate for the marketed benign water jack-up rigs is 94% as of October 2024. High utilization rates are expected to sustain as new rig builds are low in number and the cold stacked rigs are only expected to come into supply if there are contracts in hand for them.

Charter rates for modern (built post 2000) benign environment jack-up rigs have increased significantly post Covid. However, they are still well short of the prior cycle peak (Left hand side chart below)

Indian jack-up rigs market landscape

As of Aug 2024, there are 37 contracted jack-up rigs in Indian waters with a bulk of them being contracted by ONGC. Of these 37 rigs, 32 are hired by ONGC from 3rd parties like Jindal Drilling while 5 are owned and operated by ONGC. Apart from ONGC, smaller E&P operators who contract jack-up rigs from time to time are Reliance, Cairn Oil and Gas (Vedanta), Oil India and HOEC.

The key players in the jack-up rigs market in India are Shelf Drilling (Global MNC currently operating 9 jack-up rigs), Jindal Drilling (owns 4 rigs outright/via JVs/via related parties and operating 5 jack-up rigs) and Greatship India Limited (Subsidiary of GE Shipping, owns and operates 4 jack-up rigs). Apart from these, Jagson International also owns 4 jackup rigs but all of them are quite old with build years ranging between 1975-1982. Aban Offshore also owns 4 jackup rigs but the company is deeply troubled with a negative net worth and hence may not be in a position to actively compete for new rig tenders.

ONGC awards offshore rig tenders on a 3-year basis. Once contracted, both parties are bound by the terms of the agreement and contracted day rates cannot be arbitrarily modified or the tender cancelled by either party.

The present Indian Govt has shown an increasing intent to push domestic oil manufacturers to increase the domestic production of oil and gas to reduce import dependency. The oil and gas minister has recently said that E&P projects in India offer an investment opportunity of $100bn USD by 2030. While these projects will take time to materialize into revenues for companies like Jindal Drilling, there is a clear push from the Indian Govt on companies like ONGC to maintain and increase their domestic oil production.

The no. of wells ONGC has drilled over the years has been quite stable with little dependency on the price of global crude oil as can be seen in the table below. Govt owned companies like ONGC often prioritize strategic national interests over profit maximization or return on capital. Energy sufficiency is a key item of national interest for India. This bodes well for companies like Jindal Drilling.

The domestic jackup rigs market got a little spooked in June and Sep 2024, when ONGC decided to cancel or postpone negotiations for re-hiring 7 jack-up rigs over two rounds of negotiations. Industry insider speculation suggests this is a tactic from ONGC to bring down day-rates to more acceptable levels. A snapshot from the article is presented below.

Industry participants expect the posturing by ONGC to be of limited impact as global supply of jackup rigs and day rates both remain tight and ONGC cannot afford newbuild rigs owned by Indian companies to leave Indian waters from a strategic point of view. Industry participants expect new day-rate contracts to be awarded in the near term to continue to be in the 65k USD/day-90k USD/day price range.

Jindal Drilling outlook
Starting H2 FY25, Jindal Drilling has a very strong earnings outlook for the next 2 years as depicted below in the order book breakup presented by the company.

This outlook does not include the impending purchase of Jindal Pioneer by Jindal Drilling. Jindal Pioneer is currently owned by Jindal Drilling’s JV, Discovery Drilling Pvt. Ltd. Jindal owns 49% in the JV and therefore recognizes only half the profits the Jindal Pioneers in its books at present. Once the acquisition is complete, Jindal Pioneer’s full profits will start reflecting in the books of Jindal Drilling.

Jindal Supreme – The key asset

The key driver of strong profits for the next 8 Qs is going to be Jindal Supreme, which started work under a 3Y contract with ONGC from 10th October 2023. This asset was previously contracted at a rate of 40700 USD/day with ONGC. Since undergoing refurbishment from March-Sep 2024, the asset has now been re-contracted for a period of 3 years at 88859 USD/day, more than double its earlier rate. Jindal Supreme is one of two wholly owned assets of Jindal Drilling and hence does not incur any rental costs for operation. This asset was earning ~10% EBITDAM in its previous contract of 40700 USD/day. With the rate increasing to 88859 USD/day, almost all the incremental day rates will accrue directly to EBITDA. Hence this asset can start reporting a quarterly EBITDA of INR 37-41 Cr starting Q3 FY25.

Since Jindal Supreme is an old asset (Build year 1975), it had to undergo major refurbishment before entering this new contract. The total expenditure towards refurbishment is upwards of INR 130 Cr as confirmed by management in the Q3 FY25 conference call. While the exact expense number is not known, I’d think it to be in the proximity of INR 200 Cr. A bulk of this refurbishment expense is capitalized by the company and is amortized quarterly over the period of the contract. Assuming INR 20-25Cr of the 200Cr refurbishment expenses were taken directly into the P&L in H1 FY25, that would leave about INR 180Cr to be amortized over the next 12 Qs (3-year contract duration). This would lead to an INR 15Cr Quarterly refurbishment amortization expense, leading to a net quarterly EBITDA from Jindal Supreme in the range of INR 22-26Cr starting from Q3 FY25 (Gross EBITDA of INR 37-41Cr minus refurbishment expense of INR 15Cr)

Jindal Pioneer – A purchase optionality about to play out

Jindal Pioneer is owned by Jindal Drilling’s JV entity Discovery Drilling Pvt. Ltd. with Jindal owning a 49% share of the JV. The rig is currently offered on rent to Saipem for drilling operations in Mexican waters since 2019. The charter rate for the rig is 35000 USD/day at present which will increase to 40000 USD/day starting Jan 1st 2025. This is a bare-boat charter contract where all operating costs are borne by the operator, Saipem. As a result, almost the entire day rate flows to EBITDA for the JV entity and a bulk of the EBITDA flows to PBT. The JV entity seems to be reporting a PAT in the range of 18-20Cr per Q. 50% of this is reflected in Jindal Drilling’s consol PAT numbers i.e. about 9-10Cr INR per Quarter.

Jindal Drilling is on the verge of buying out Jindal Pioneer from the JV entity for 75 million USD. The transaction has already been approved by shareholders and is awaiting certain regulatory clearances which are imminent. Once Jindal Pioneer comes on the books of Jindal Drilling, the PAT contribution from this asset to Jindal Drilling will jump from INR 9-10 Cr range to INR 18-20 Cr range. This transaction is likely to go through before the end of this year. The net cash outflow for the purchase deal is expected to be around 45 million USD only which will be paid in tranches from internal cash flows without raising any external debt (Specifics of the transaction explained in the snapshots below)

Quarterly PAT can show significant upside starting Q3 FY25

As per estimates, Jindal Drilling can start reporting INR 50-60Cr quarterly PAT starting Q3 FY25 for the next 6-8 quarters straight. Let us see how we arrive at this number

  • Base case standalone PAT – Let us consider the Q4 FY24 standalone PAT numbers as our base case. This was a Quarter in which all 5 assets were operational (Jindal Supreme was operating under old rates of 40700 USD/day and stopped operations on 24th March, 2024). The base case standalone PAT is INR 32Cr.

  • Additional PAT from Jindal Supreme - As discussed above, Jindal Supreme can report a quarterly EBITDA of INR 22-26Cr from Q3 after netting off the amortization of refurbishment expenses. Most of this EBITDA should flow down to PBT and should contribute INR 15-18Cr of additional PAT per quarter.

  • Optionality from Jindal Pioneer purchase - At present, the two JVs DDPL (which owns Pioneer) and VDPL (Which owns Virtue-I) are reporting a Quarterly PAT of INR 9-10Cr each at the level of Jindal Drilling consolidated. If Jindal Pioneer is outright bought by Jindal Drilling, then its PAT contribution to the company’s nos will double leading to an additional INR 9-10Cr of PAT.

  • Taken together, item nos 1-3 illustrate that Jindal Drilling can start reporting a Quarterly PAT of INR 56-60Cr starting Q3 FY25 for the next 6-8 Qs at least.

Outlook beyond the next 6-8 Quarters

Jindal Drilling has three rigs finishing their existing contracts in the next 2 years. Jindal Explorer finishes in May 2025 and Jindal Discovery I and Jindal Star finish respectively in May 2026 and July 2026. These rigs are operating at low day rates presently in the range of USD 39k-45k/day.

As discussed earlier, while the recent rig contract cancellations by ONGC have caused some concern in the industry, the broader global industry dynamics dictate that ONGC should come around to re-contracting these assets for the next cycle at rates between USD 65k-90k/day. If it does not do that then it risks these rigs leaving Indian waters to seek fairly priced contracts in other strong offshore markets such as SE Asia and Latin America. Therefore, it is not unreasonable to assume that all 3 rigs will find significantly remunerative and EBITDA accretive contracts for the next cycle where day rates will be far superior to the current day rates for these assets.

If the robust offshore environment persists, then Jindal Drilling has the optionality to also purchase the other JV rig, Jindal Virtue 1 in the coming few years. This should help increase the company’s PAT and cash flows similar to how the acquisition of Jindal Pioneer is likely to do the same in FY25.

Hence, the medium term (3-5 year) prospects of Jindal Drilling look quite stable with a high probability of sustained high cash flows and PAT. Jindal Drilling has a very comfortable balance sheet and increase cash flows from the repriced contracts should help maintain their balance sheet strength going forward.

Valuations

On a rolling 4 quarter basis starting Q3 FY25, based on the contracts in hand, Jindal Drilling seems to be trading at a forward PE multiple of 8-9x (Based on current MCap of 1974Cr and rolling 4Q PAT expectations of INR 225-240Cr). With a strong balance sheet and expected strong cash flows from the higher rate contracts, there doesn’t appear to be much of a downside risk to stock prices at current levels.

Material risks to be aware of

  • A Covid like disaster which pushes global oil prices below 60$/barrel on a sustained basis leading to cancellation or non-renewal of drilling contracts by global E&P majors

  • In 2024, there have been some concerns about the rig contracting environment after Saudi Aramco decided to release 27 jackup rigs (6% of global jackup rigs supply) from contracts in H1 CY24. However, 8 of them have already re-contracted in other markets and 1 has been scrapped while about 10 others are thought to be internationally uncompetitive and hence not likely to be a source of supply disruption

  • ONGC being adamant about rates, successfully negotiating lower than expected rates for Jindal’s assets which are coming up for re-contracting in FY26 and FY27 leading to lower than expected profitability. Although Jindal Drilling has the optionality of taking its rigs to international waters in that case, as it had done with Jindal Pioneer in 2019, which was taken to Mexico

  • Management has not explicitly called out the refurbishment expense for Jindal Supreme. I have assumed it to be INR 200Cr and hence calculated Quarterly amortization expenses of INR 15Cr. If the refurbishment expenses are materially higher (Unlikely, in my opinion), then there is an upside risk to the amortization nos and a downside risk to the Quarterly PAT projection of INR 56-60Cr.

Sources

Disclaimer: I have investments in the stock as part of my portfolio and hence I am biased. Offshore oil and gas is a cyclical sector, so please do your own due diligence on sector outlook for the next few years. My analysis can always be wrong and I may change my view or portfolio allocations at any time.

83 Likes

A good thread. It got my interest.
Question- before the rigs can be redeployed, around 6 to 8 months are taken for refurbishment and new contract. Also a significant money is required for refurbishment.
Considering that only 5 rigs will operate for complete next year. (Jindal explorer is active in q1 however jindal pioneer will not be active in q4 fy25.
This will impact the PAT for next year by approx. 6 to 7 Cr per quarter.(Based on above calculation)
I will study further to understand unit economics.

3 Likes

Thanks for the great write-up @nirvana_laha .
https://rigcount.bakerhughes.com/ is great source to track drilling activity of oil and gas industry across the world.
It releases worldwide data of active rig count during first week of every month. (Active rig: drilling activities occurred during the majority of week).
overview of latest data:

Monthly break up region wise/offshore/land drilling:

October-24 September-24 October-23
Land Offshore Total Month Variance Land Offshore Total Month Variance Year Ago Land Offshore Total
Latin America 115 40 155 -2 118 39 157 -20 147 28 175
Europe 97 25 122 1 95 26 121 0 87 35 122
Africa 89 11 100 -6 94 12 106 -11 90 21 111
Middle East 301 41 342 5 302 35 337 5 293 44 337
Asia-Pacific 124 107 231 5 126 100 226 14 126 91 217
International 726 224 950 3 735 212 947 -12 743 219 962
United States 568 18 585 -2 567 20 587 -37 600 23 623
Canada 217 2 219 2 214 3 217 27 191 1 192
North America 785 20 804 1 781 23 804 -10 791 24 814
Worldwide 1511 244 1754 4 1516 235 1751 -22 1534 243 1776

we can also track active rig count activity country wise/yearly/quarterly as mentioned in the below report.
October-2024 WorldWide Rig Count Report.xlsx (1.1 MB)
Baker Huges also provides separate data for North-America(USA and Canada) which is more detailed.

Discl: Invested recently. Not significant allocation of portfolio.

13 Likes

I miscalculated the JV profits in the above calculations. The actual PAT nos. should be significantly more than what I have calculated. Let’s redo again in brief

  1. Baseline standalone PAT number = INR 32 Cr
  2. Additional PAT from Jindal Supreme = INR 15-18 Cr
  3. When rig Jindal Pioneer is purchased by Jindal Drilling, then it can contribute INR 18-20Cr PAT at standalone level to Jindal Drilling. This is basis the fact that at JV level (49% ownership), this asset is contributing INR 9-10Cr PAT below the line as on date.
  4. Adding item nos #1-3, post Pioneer acquisition, the standalone PAT itself can look like INR 65-69 Cr per Quarter
  5. At a consol level, JV Virtue Drilling Pvt Ltd. (owner of rig Virtue I) will continue
    contributing below the line PAT of INR 9-10Cr per Quarter on top of the standalone numbers.

So, at a consol level, Jindal Drilling can report Quarterly PAT of INR 74-79 Cr post Pioneer acquisition. Even without the Pioneer acquisition, the company should report Quarterly PAT in the range of INR 65-69Cr per Quarter.

Somebody pointed out that Jindal Explorer will be out of contract in May 2025, impacting PAT. The nos won’t be significant because

  1. Management expects Jindal Explorer to extend its contract till Sep 2025 (Q3 earnings call)
  2. Jindal Explorer is a rented rig which is on the lowest day rate of < 39k USD/day. Hence its the least profitable of Jindal’s current rigs. I won’t be surprised if it was earning an EBITDA margin in the 5-10% range, i.e. in the 1950-3900 USD/day range. This should not translate to a PAT loss of more than INR 1-2 Cr per Quarter. Thus, barely an impact.
  3. There’s a good chance Jindal Explorer will bag a significantly more remunerative contract either with ONGC or in International waters post a brief refurbishment hiatus of a couple of months. That should only add to the PAT numbers discussed above.
15 Likes

Thanks for the detailed thread @nirvana_laha .

I have done some work on the largest offshore drilling operator (Transocean) which operates Ultra Deepwater floaters (UDW) and semi-subs. I agree the supply side of the market in offshore drilling has tightened with almost no new drillships being ordered in last 8 years.

  1. Do you have a view on longevity of the cycle for jackups? In UDWs, the last cycle lasted for almost 10 years with utilization being above 90% which peaked in 2014 for reasons you have already mentioned above. It is important to see how long can these elevated earnings last.
    image

  2. Do you know how the current day-rates stack up vs the last upcycle? In UDWs, day-rates had touched $600k/day for high spec rigs in 2014. However, in the current cycle, we are seeing day-rates just levelling at those levels and no higher for contracts which are being signed for 2026-27. I would have expected day rates to be at-least 20-30% higher if we just adjust for inflation and also keeping in mind that the current fleet of rigs is much higher spec (8th gen now vs 6/7th gen in last cycle). Do you see significant upside in day-rates in jackups from where they currently stand because the cash flows will look very different then.

  3. How does the current orderbook in jackups look like and where do day-rates have to be to incentivize new-builds? I’m looking at the current day-rates of average 80k and if I assume 40% EBITDA margin, that would be (80k * 365 *0.4) $13mm of annual EBITDA for a jackup which costs $200mm, i.e. 6.5% annualized returns which are below cost of capital. So my preliminary understanding is for rates to be much higher with a higher visibility on contract duration to incentivize any newbuilds. So either supply will remain constrained or day-rates increase materially which should both be positive for Jindal Drilling.

I also see that the operating margins have gotten materially impacted year on year despite increase in revenue which seems odd given the operating leverage.

10 Likes

Very good post @nirvana_laha

  1. Given that this is a rental business of sorts, what has caused the extreme volatility in earnings over the last decade? Ex of covid, margins have varied -40% to +38%.
    I would have assumed a more gradual change in margins as old contracts run-off and new ones come with market pricing prevalent.

In this context, in what scenarios can we see margins collapsing? (given that pricing is fixed for 2-3 years)

  1. How should one think of economics of rigs if one had to put up fresh capex? if I spend $100mn in putting up a rig, what kind of ROIC/IRR should I build in and how? @Deepesh_Punetha has touched up on it, but would be good to double click.
  2. What is your sense of the use of the large cashflows? Will they return or are there relevant reinvestment opportunities?

I don’t have a view beyond the commentary of global jack-up operators. What is clear and should have a bearing on the cycle, is that new supply is almost non existent.

And as you rightly pointed out, even at current day rates, justifying ordering a new jack-up rig is not sensible because return on capital is well below cost. Newbuild jack-up rig quotes range from 200mn-300mn USD depending on specifications and at 90k USD/day jack-up rates and even assuming aggressive EBITDA margins of 50%, the return on capital employed ranges between 5.5%-8.5%, significantly below any reasonable estimate of cost of capital.

This is why you see offshore asset managers like Valaris talking about returning cash to shareholders rather than deploying them on new assets. This is why the orderbook to fleet ratio is as low as it is and thinking logically, this supply crunch should continue for the foreseeable future. Also time to build a new rig ranges between 2-3 years, so even if new orders come in, for the rig to add to fleet supply, there will be a delay of 2-3 years.

Some data on current jackup outlook, utilisation and day rates from Valaris’s Q3 PPT and Shelf Drilling’s Q2 PPT.

image

So the global cycle looks robust judged in terms of the supply side. The jack in the box is of course global demand which nobody can predict. But as long as oil prices are above 60$/barrel, industry research seems to suggest that there will be no significant cutdown in offshore drilling volumes by E&P companies.

Some near term risks specific to Jindal Drilling which should be closely tracked

  • Further suspension of rigs by Saudi Aramco can sour the mood for the entire jackup market (27 rigs dehired by them so far in CY24)
  • ONGC has been trying hard to bring down day rates for their contracts as seen by them playing hardball by cancelling/postponing two tenders for 7 jackups in June and Sep. How that resolves will be critical for Jindal Drilling in the medium term. In the near term (8-12 Qs) it may not matter as much because the three rigs coming off contract in CY25 and CY26 all have present operating day rates in the range of 38k-48k/day and any new contracts in CY25 and CY26 should be at higher prices as things stand.
15 Likes

Very informative and well written thread. Just couple of cents as an industry insider.

We need to distinguish between shallow offshore drilling and deep-water drilling both of which have different ecosystem, economics and technologies.

Deep-water drilling requires floaters which are in tight supply due to higher deep-water drilling activities and hence higher day rates.

Shallow water drilling requires jack up rigs which can be further classified into two categories: 1) Premium 2) Regular

Market for premium jack up rigs seems to be good and supply and demand remain in tight balance. However market for regular jack up rigs is still quite soft due to suspensions of some key contracts globally (e.g. Saudi Arabia) and there is currently an oversupply of rigs in the industry.

So it’s important to take a granular view of an oil field services company’s work pipeline.

Also oil prices will always be a key driver and even term contracts don’t offer much protection if there is drop in oil prices and an operator decides to suspend the drilling/workover activities. Small companies like Jindals won’t go to court to fight their big customers ONGC knowing fully well that they will need them back when market conditions improve. They will have no option but to swallow the bitter pill. That’s why there is an inherent unpredictability to cash flows due to erratic receivables especially if you are dealing with government owned companies.

Again from my last many years of experience, best times to enter the oil and gas sector, in any form, is at the bottom of cycle with favorable risk reward.

That said, I like Jindal Drilling for their execution capability and good management. And if new Trump administration doesn’t move for high tariffs against China and aggressive fracking policies, we might continue to see a quite conducive environment for the offshore rig providers.

27 Likes

On a macro level, currently across world wide the oil supply is bit more than the demand, (2-3%), now that trump has promised lower crude oil prices this will affect the Jindal drilling Directly, however over night without the increase in supply the oil prices can’t go down drastically (barring pandemic events), so they need to more extraction which will increase the demand for rigs.

So all in all the oil price may not go up by a lot, which is not lucrative for the oil extraction which inturn adversely affect Jindal drilling

Any thoughts?

6 Likes

I dont know why they have been refusing to give the exact rent figures for individual rigs and the refurbishment costs incurred when they have given this data (in not so organized manner) in the past ARs. Have calculated rent as per current contracts for the three rented rigs from whatever data we have in the past Annual reports (nos. are approximate because they don’t give the exact figures)
Rent (only valid till the individual contracts end)

  1. Jindal Star - $18,000/day
  2. Jindal Explorer - $23,000/day
  3. Jindal Virtue-1 - $48,000/day
    Refurbishment cost (ammortized over 3 years in the head drilling operating expense)
  4. Virtue-1 - 85 Cr. (FY24)
  5. Star - 96 Cr. (37 Cr.+ 59 Cr. in FY23 & 24 respectively)
  6. Discovery - 82 Cr. (37Cr.+ 45 Cr, in FY23 & 24 respectively)
  7. Supreme - 72 Cr. (FY21)
  8. Explorer - 50-60 Cr. (back calculations. no data)
3 Likes

Trump cant directly lower oil prices and one shouldn’t be misled into believing him if he says so.

Oil prices are simply a function of demand and supply. US and China are the largest consumers of crude demand and between the two it’s China that has been an overhang on crude demand, if not materially then at least sentiment wise.

On the supply side, US over the last few years have joined Saudi Arabia as a swing producer and US supply is something that Trump can influence. But again jury is divided as to how the US oil producers will respond to Trump’s lenient fiscal policies (tax cut etc). The reason the US production has been flat is simply because of shareholder activism that has put pressure on CEO’s to maximize return for the shareholders through higher dividends and buybacks and prudent investment in production growth.

Different extraction activities require different breakeven prices for them to be lucrative depending on geology and geography. Plus drilling activities can be influenced by other factors than just purely oil prices.

That’s why one needs to take a granular view of the market, supply chain and eocsystem set up to properly evaluate different companies in this space.

4 Likes

We share the view on the supply and demand dynamics which influence the price

However the premise of my query was the paradox of it,

Although I agree that drilling activities may be depends on other factors, however the incremental profitability of the drilling industry, is directly proportional to crude oil price, since the whole premise itself that the supply of drilling rigs are not gonna increase meaningfully, so unless the crude oil picks up meaningfully there wont be incremental profit growth that can happen , which in turn directly affects the share price growth.

While taking a granular view on jindal drilling here the setup of the thesis is based on the fact that the incremental profits may be influenced by following rigs and upcoming contracts

Although the data suggest that jackup demand to be stable, but if the crude oil price doesn’t increase , the new contracts may not be yield better profitability , which affects investment time horizon as well as expectation built on it (Allocation conviction).

The idea behind, my queries to get understanding of the people who has allocated more interm’s of the PF percentage, and how they are thinking about above mentioned scenarios.

Any view and clarification based on their research and thought process is very much appreciated.
Thanks @nirvana_laha

Disclaimer: Invested and biased. (looking to build more conviction to increase the allocation, since, its not long term play, at best its medium term, so for any meaningful return needs higher allocation)

If you are not familiar with nitty gritty of upstream producers here is a quick refresher. When companies decide to invest in drilling activities it’s based on very rigorous probabilistic modeling of a whole range of factors including production growth needed, oil prices, supply chain etc that are then forecast over 5 years. So when, in most of the cases, companies decide to drill the wells they don’t change that plan based on 5-15% shallow fluctuations in oil prices because they are already factored into their business plan.

What could change that are extreme events (e.g. covid) or shale boom that can lead to 50-100% cuts in oil prices or major wars (e.g. Ukraine-Russia) that saw oil prices crossing 120.

So in my view as long as oil stays with 65-85 price range, it will be business as usual. It’s not that a drilling contractor working on a term contract will charge more to their customers if oil prices move up by 5-10% tomorrow or vice-versa. They get paid what their contract says. The only risk is unpredictability of execution which is what gets impacted if there are deep fluctuations in oil prices.

What one has to look at is risk-reward in their investment. Markets discount all positives and negatives very quickly and often before normal investors like us. So if a stock has run up 8-10 x already one needs to evaluate how much of all future positives are already factored in and what are the possibilities of any negative surprises.

12 Likes

Thanks for the detailed explanation and your time.

And yes it’s is inline with what I had heard from one of my friend who works in gulf as an actuarial consultant for oil company in omen.
I can resonate well with this point.

And one more question on the personal level, in your opinion how much of the growth has already been baked into the CMP (in terms of percentage)

Once again appreciate your time to clarify and educate on topic. Thank you

“And one more question on the personal level, in your opinion how much of the growth has already been baked into the CMP (in terms of percentage)”

Hard to comment on this question and I’ll be just speculating or betting on/against the market which will be just pointless. For cyclical stocks and that too in this business where even cycles are unpredictable or unevenly spaced, margin of safety has to be healthy and there views may vary depending on one’s own outlook (bullish/bearish) on the sector, risk appetite and time horizon.

2 Likes

Hi,

I tried to guess the numbers for next fiscal year.
Quarterly runrate comes around 41Cr.
Assumption- 1) Jindal explorer is rehired at 80k with 2 month idle time.
2) No change in Jindal pioneer ownership.
3) Opex is guesswork from FY24 Number.
4) Refurbishment is taken with buffer.

Inviting feedback from all and please suggest if something can be improved in the above table.

Disclosure : Invested

4 Likes

ONGC planning to replace two of its old offshore rigs by ordering new rigs with Indian shipyards. Estimated cost is 250/275mn $ per rig.

Assuming a 30 year rig life and 90k USD/day charter rates and a generous 60% EBITDA margin, the annual EBIT works out to be 10.6-11.4mn USD. A payback period of 22-26 years.

With these economics, there is no threat of a sudden supply overhang. The only thing that can impact rig rates substantially is a sustained downturn in oil prices below 60$/barrel.

20 Likes

Hi @Ravi.0104 ,
I don’t think its ideal to take 60% of overall EBIDTA as PAT for jindal supreme , because before current contract , jindal supreme was working with less rated contract and still it was profitable so I think now the extra hike in contract will overall flow into EBIDTA/PAT.
Also it was mentioned that refurbishment cost for supreme is more than 120cr mentioned in one of their concall.

Disc: Invested

1 Like

This is average realisation.
i am considering 25% tax and rest 15% for depreciation and interest. for 300 CR projected EBIDTA , interest is 20 CR and Depreciation is 65CR .
PAT will be around 160 CR which is around 60%.

2 Likes

This is one forwarded. Interesting

6 Likes