Would you like to update on this please. I am aware that RS Software is also a stock preferred by you based on its fundamentals, any other stock which is showing good value growth in current market?
Answering even though the question is addressed to Hitesh.
BajajCorp: I read in one of their presentation that the brand is leased to them for 99 years from 2008. That is a long long way to go. I think it is a common practice to lease brand names. When Motorola split into two, one company leased the brand name to the other for 99 years.
@anubhav… I dont follow rs software so not much idea… about growth value… canfin currently seems attractive. It is not in a class of gruh or hdfc but looks undervalued and can continue to grow looking at loan book growth.
@ashwini damani… subbu has correctly answered your question… they will continue to face some headwinds due to acquisition related costs.
@rohit… inox flag seems to have failed. but broad uptrend looks intact till the recent low of 107 is not broken.
I have spent some time on the weekend researching Tree House which as many of you know is a company in the business of owning and managing pre-schools and K12 schools all across India.
Here are my investment arguments with risks. Would love your comments.
The company currently has 379 pre-schools under management (300 are owned by the company). They earn revenues from these by way of fees paid by parents. The other model is managing K-12 schools for which the company pays as advance for sole management rights for 30 years and then is paid annually a consulting fee based on a per student basis. The company has been growing in the past 3 years at a CAGR of 50% plus and is currently trading at a PE of 23.
Investment Arguments:
Company
primarily operates in the owned model as opposed to franchise business which
allows it to have a stricter control on quality
The
advantage of own model is that the individual branch can produce a profit at
a much lower level of capacity utilization as compared to.
Space
for pre schools is generally taken on rent - cost for setting up is only 50
lakhs making it asset light
Last
3 years the company has stuck by its strategy and opened only 10 new
franchisees as compared to 100 odd self operated schools
Own
teacher training programs will result in managing shortage of quality
teachers
Pre
schools will act as feeders to the K12 schools thereby ensuring high
occupancy - K12 schools are located close to Pre schools
Management
doing things differently from competition such as offering ESOP's to teachers
to reduce attrition, expanding reach through own school model as opposed to
franchise model and having teacher training programs
Preschool
on rental basis is an asset light model which only requires 50% utilization
to have almost 50% ROC - with time the overall operation capacity utilization
is expected to improve thereby improving EBITDA margins
Company
has plans to add 513 new schools by the year 2016. At a capex of 60 lakhs per
school and 2/3 own operated that is a capital outlay of 200 crores over the
next 3 years. 75% of this expansion can be funded by internal accruals
The
company plans to sell its 4 own operated and owned K12 schools (book value of
land and building is 96 crore) which will reduce the asset base of the
company and provide it with cash for expanding its pre-school business and
improve return ratios by 20% (once all 4 land pieces are sold)
Further,
it has almost completed its CAPEX cycle regarding acquiring of BCR for
operating schools thereby reducing capital outla (as evidenced from the
change in loans and advances of only 6 crores between March 13 and Sept 13).
It has acquired rights to 12 schools in the last 2 years (taking total to 24)
The
company has made investments of more than 110 crore in acquiring BCR but this
is likely to start paying off only from 2014 onwards. While revenue from this
stream is currently low (only 10 crore) this can be expected to rise steadily
as capacity utilization of schools under management increase. This should
again increase EBITDA at no additional cost thereby improving profitability
Schools
started before 2011 have an average total students of 110 (50% capacity) and
therefore as more and more schools become older, capacity utilization is
expected to increase and increase EBITDA margins. National average is 75
students per school as compared to 55 in 2011. All schools started before
2012 have already reached profitability!
The
ROCE of the pre school business was 21% in 2013 which is only expected to go
up further
Key risks include:
1. Low barriers to entry
2. All players in rapid expansion mode which might lead to a "price war" as schools fight for students
3.Pre schools which are not currently under regulation might come under it in the future.
Hiteshji, I request you to please post your comments on the stock
nice work up on treehouse… I had a brief look at it earlier. Problem with that is there is virtual overcrowding in the space it operates in… So I felt there are better options elsewhere and refrained.
[quote="am648, post:1125, topic:871945645"]
> Hiteshji, and also other experience boarders.
>
> I have spent some time on the weekend researching Tree House which as many of you know is a company in the business of owning and managing pre-schools and K12 schools all across India.
>
> Here are my investment arguments with risks. Would love your comments.
>
> The company currently has 379 pre-schools under management (300 are owned by the company). They earn revenues from these by way of fees paid by parents. The other model is managing K-12 schools for which the company pays as advance for sole management rights for 30 years and then is paid annually a consulting fee based on a per student basis. The company has been growing in the past 3 years at a CAGR of 50% plus and is currently trading at a PE of 23.
>
> Investment Arguments:
[/quote]
I observed 2 main issues with Tree House or other Pre-school business
Entry barrier is low. There is no moat for any brand. I have seen more than 5 national brands + thousands of local pre-schools in my town alone. I can see most of those have sufficient crowd.
Future growth is not predictable or rather not promising. Tree House is already having decent presence Pan India so where is future expansion ?
In past Educomp was hot stock but could not sustained its model.
Regarding where they will grow - penetration on pre-schools in India is abysmal. Only 2 million out of 150 million children from the age of 0 and 6 currently attend preschool and this concept is catching up fast among parents. Secondly, Tree House has 50% of its schools in Mumbai - it has a weak presence in South and EAst where they plan to expand over the coming 2-3 years.
The Q3 results for “RS Software” are looking good. On its 5 year-chart it is very near its 5-year High. Some big investor “Dolly Khanna” has increased her stake in this quarter. I have bought some decent quantity. Just wanted to know your views on this stock. Thanking you in advance and always appreciate you for sharing your knowledge so freely.
As a business there are less variables in PI but it is priced to perfection… Its likely to grow at 25-30% cagr.
Kaveri … I think there might be more juice left… And management categorically states that it is likely to grow at 20% cagr which we should consider as a base case scenario… Anything higher in terms of growth would be icing on the cake… If and when the company hikes dividend payout, there could be more re rating.
Based on cmp, kaveri is a better choice… But based on business quality PI has the edge.
what is ur call on granules india?..can i treat it as any other pharma co and value it according?..what could be the triggers in p/e re rating…granules look good at 150-200 levels…