Great articles to read on the web

this is a fantastic read about a little known but extremely successful silicon valley investor

link: https://joincolossus.com/article/the-visions-of-neil-mehta-greenoaks/

10/10, highly recommed

sharing some of my favorite snippets below

1/

2/

3/

4/

5/

12 Likes

great lessons from jatin khemani sir, valuable insights, Grateful to you sir, keep providing such valuable insights sir, and thanks to the person who uploaded, keep uploading such valuable content. it really helps.

I was feeling aggrieved about my lack of concentration these days. I read the Stern article practically in one sitting, spilling water while having breakfast.
I too dream of investing in a down and out company with great prospects. Then I look at Mehtas of this world and their deep-diving, and I bow to them.

Great word of wisdoms:

The next multibagger rarely comes with flashing neon signs or front-page headlines. It’s usually hiding in plain sight—quiet, overlooked, even ridiculed. The crowd doesn’t see it, the analysts don’t model it, and most investors dismiss it outright. That’s precisely why it has room to surprise.

Great winners are almost always born misunderstood. In the early days, the narrative is confusion, doubt, and disbelief. The market sees “risk,” while the few who dig deeper see “optionality.” And as the business executes step by step—building moats, scaling operations, defying skeptics—the price begins its quiet march.

Then one fine day, the switch flips. The world “discovers” it. Media calls it visionary, institutions pile in, and the same voices that once mocked it now call it a “wonderful business.” But by then, the outsized gains have already been harvested by those who believed before the spotlight arrived.

The essence of superior investing lies in this gap—between perception and reality, between doubt and conviction. The crowd waits for validation; the true investor moves before it.

So remember: the next big winner won’t look obvious. It will look questionable, messy, maybe even boring. And that’s the very disguise that hides greatness until it’s too late.

Disclaimer: Copy and paste from Twitter handle of Arun Mukherjee.

17 Likes

This is indeed more or less perfect articulation of investing journey.

All multi baggers are almost always in the hindsight. No one predicted those at the start of their journey. All analysts generally start painting rosy picture once it has already been 5 or 10 bagger. That’s how analysts operate (unfortunately!!). Why will they tell you that specific stock is going to be a multi-bagger in advance before they themself have made some profit by investing much before you.

I may be wrong but this is my personal experience.

You have to build your own framework, process and conviction. TCS used to trade at P/E < 18 during its early days while Infosys used to have Avg P/E of about 25. How many analysts would have thought that TCS was undervalued at that time. Very Few. Eventually TCS started commanding Avg P/E of 25 to 30.

2 Likes

I found this article by Eagle Point Capital which talks about the different kinds of business and how they navigate an inflationary world.
Building Resilience to Inflation
This write-up references and builds on Warren Buffett’s 1977 article on How inflation swindles the equity investor

It touches upon:

  • Why equity investors in inflationary times are forced to invest fresh capital just to keep up with purchasing power and ROIC
  • Then it goes on to list different kinds of businesses and how resilient they are, or how much pricing power they have to beat inflation. Examples touched include Commodities, Long Lived assets (real estate, infra, railways, utilities), Take rate or pipeline like business (Actual pipelines, tollbridge, Visa, Amex, Mastercard, AMCs), Insurance etc.

While the piece starts off on inflation resilience, it includes a great write-up on qualities of great businesses with pricing power. This can be useful in helping build a mental model on the qualities an investor can look for while buying any business.

11 Likes

I have found out an excellent article regarding the distinction between intrinsic value and a market price of a stock.

The Calculus of Value ( The Memo by Howard Marks).

The memo presents a framework for understanding the distinction between intrinsic value and market price, emphasizing that value is derived from the fundamentals of an asset, while price is shaped by investor psychology and market forces. Marks highlights how elevated prices and optimistic psychology can disconnect prices from underlying value, and discusses the risks associated with such environments. He reviews market developments in 2025 (including tariff shocks and relief rallies), and the increasingly prominent role of tech giants in market valuations, usually at higher price/earnings (p/e) ratios. The memo concludes with advice for investors to become more defensive in periods of high valuation and exuberant investor sentiment.

4 Likes

Universal business lessons that applies to building businesses in any Industry.

3 Likes

https://archive.ph/CKCVH
Mistaken Ghost Order Caused Worst India Trading Blunder in Years

The broker informed the sellers about the error soon after the market open, telling them that Avendus had managed to repurchase the shares and that there would be no losses for the family, according to the people.

Won’t there be a huge tax due incoming because of this? The cost of these promoter shares must be in single digits and sold at more than 1k.

5 Likes

Found this substack helpful to understand the economics of capex in hospital sector.

2 Likes

Must read for novice as well as a reminder for investors been in the markets
Brightcom Saga: How numbers can lie.

Summarised the entire story:

What Happened
SEBI dropped hammer on Brightcom Group Ltd (BGL), exposing years of deceptive accounting and misleading disclosures. Once hailed as a digital marketing powerhouse, BGL is now suspended from trading and facing serious penalties.

Key Violations

  • Impairment Losses Hidden: ₹868 crore in losses were tucked away in “Other Comprehensive Income” instead of the Profit & Loss statement—masking the company’s true financial health.
  • Fake Promoter Shareholding: Promoters quietly sold off shares, dropping from 40% to 3.5%, while falsely reporting 18.47%—misleading investors for nearly a decade.
  • R&D Cost Manipulation: ₹504 crore in R&D expenses were wrongly capitalized as assets, inflating profits and balance sheets.
  • Intangible Asset Shenanigans: Costs were delayed and misclassified to make the company appear more valuable than it was.

Fallout: Over 6 lakh retail investors are stuck, with no way to trade.

8 Likes
2 Likes