Eris seems to be managed all functions like manufacturing , sales , branding , and even IT systems very smartly
Malolan
1 Like
Notes from AR iro Eris Lifesciences for FY 21-22 -
-
Company remains focussed on brand building. Their top 15 mother brands clock in 80 pc of the company revenues. Company grew in double digits despite IPM growth of 1.3 pc ( only - due pandemic hitting acute therapies ). The same was due to company’s focus on chronic therapies. Field force productivity improved 15 pc during the year.
-
Company has exiting organic and inorganic growth opportunities ahead -
(a) Rich pipeline of new product launches led by patent expiries in cardio-metabolic and allied segments.
(b) Expanding coverage of specialists and consulting physicians.
(c) Company’s push for early detection and better life cycle management through patient care initiatives.
(d) Tech investments to improve sales force productivity.
(e) Company is on the look out for high-return in-licensing and acquisition opportunities. -
Currently, ERIS is ranked 22 in IPM and is the only pure play India focussed company in the listed space. Revenues have grown 6X in last 10 yrs and 2X in last 5 yrs. Company has maintained ROIC > 30 pc for last 12 Yrs. Chronic focussed portfolio contributes 91 pc of sales with 7 pc of sales coming from NLEM drugs. Company is ranked no 3 among diabetologists and no 4 among cardiologists. Company’s top 10 products are ranked among top 5 in their respective categories. Two of company’s brands rank no 1 in their respective categories - Gluxit ( Dapagliflozin ) and Zomelis ( Vildagliptin ). Another dominant brand from company’s stable is Renerve ( nutraceutical ) is clocking annual sales of 135 cr.
-
For FY 21-22, Cardio metabolic segment ( 60 pc of company revenue ) grew by 9.7 pc vs Mkt growth of 9.3 pc. Nutraceuticals ( 20 pc of business ) grew by 15 pc vs Mkt growth of 8.6 pc. Gross margins reduced from 84 pc to 80 pc due to increased investments behind new launches.
-
Therapy wise revenue breakdown -
Oral diabetes care - 32 pc
Cardiac care - 26 pc
Vitamins, Minerals,Nutrients - 20 pc
CNS - 7 pc
GI - 6 pc
Gynae - 4 pc
Pain - 2 pc
Others - 3 pc
- Manufacturing infra - Manufacturing facility at Guwahati accounted for 74 pc of all products sold in FY 21. Also eligible for tax benefits till FY 24 and GST subsidies till FY 25.
Disc : invested, biased.
2 Likes
Company hosted an investor call with Bank of America and Abakkus PMS on 18 Jul 22.
Disc : invested, biased
Can you share the link of Eris’ FY22 annual report? I haven’t been able to find the same.
Hi…
It was available on company website a few days ago. Now, even I can’t locate it. 
Q1 results from Eris Lifesciences. Prima facie, results look mixed.
However, company has guided for 30 pc revenue and 16-17 pc EBITDA growth for FY 23. Will have to listen to concall to figure out where is such confidence emanating from.
Disc: invested, biased.
3 Likes
I was on the call, most growth is coming from Oaknet acquistion (contribution will be ~185 cr. to Eris in FY23). Also, a few of their products are doing very well (zomelis crossed 100 cr. runrate, CNS is growing at 20%+, Insulin portfolio should do 20 cr. annual revenues, and they have 15+ launches planned this year). Margin wise, it will be a soft year. They are guiding for margins reverting to 36% by FY25.
Disclosure: Invested (position size here, no transactions in last-30 days)
5 Likes
Thanks for the prompt reply. One doubt that I have… In Q1, Oaknet’s contribution was only 31 cr ( as per investor PPT ). Doing 185 cr for full FY from Oaknet looks like a tall ask.
Did the management throw any light on this?? Is the Oaknet business showing increased momentum in Jul-Aug etc??
Thanks in advance.
1 Like
Quarterly run-rate of Oaknet is actually 55 cr., only 31 cr. was accrued to Eris in Q1 as the acquisition was done in early May 2022 (so 24 cr. did not accrue to Eris). Management is guiding that 55 cr. quarterly sales look sustainable, if thats the case for the full year Eris should get 31+55*3 ~ 196 cr. So 185 cr. is doable if Oaknet maintains the runrate.
5 Likes
FY23Q1
- Guidance: 30% consolidated revenue growth, 32-33% EBITDA margin. Will be back to 36% EBITDA margin by FY25
- Zomelis brand has crossed 8.3 cr. monthly sales (annual run-rate of 100 cr.). This should be the 4th 100 cr. brand by end of FY23
- Oaknet: Quarterly run rate of 55 cr. sales and 10 cr. EBITDA
- Cardio market has started reviving in June-July (average growth has increased to 13% vs 2% in the past twelve month)
- Aprica: profitability will be maintained ~20%
- In order to get to 14-15% organic growth trajectory, IPM growth has to come back to 8-10%
- Expect 200 bps pressure on gross margin due to newer launches
- Expect to deliver 20 cr.+ annual sales of insulin with EBITDA loss of 15 cr. Will launch insulin Glargine in Q3FY23 (in-licensed from Biocon). One-time payment and then sourcing arrangement (no recurring royalties)
- Gujarat facility will commence in Q4FY23 – capex incurred was 34 cr. (100 cr. incurred till date). Total expected capex ~ 170-180 cr.
- EBITDA margins will be impacted: (1) EBITDA losses due to insulin launch, (2) a lot of new product launches in cardiology in Q2 and Q3, (3) Oaknet margins
- Have not had new launches in CNS, but this segment is growing at 20-25%
- Trade generics: Had 8 cr. EBITDA loss in FY22 and will move to breakeven in FY23
Disclosure: Same as before
6 Likes
This sounds like a catastrophic news for Domestic branded generic players.
Requesting views form better informed Forum members.
1 Like
Very insightful interview, management covers their diabetes and CV launches along with the rationale for Oaknet acquisition. Also, they mention that current rules will mostly impact trade generic companies.
3 Likes
Company came up with reasonable results, Oaknet business has turned around faster than earlier guided and is already doing 24% EBITDA margins. Management is guiding for 30% sales growth and 16-17% EBITDA growth in FY23. Recovery in cardiovascular division is the reason behind the confidence. Concall notes below.
FY23Q2
- Guidance maintained at 30% sales growth and 16-17% EBIDTA growth for FY23. Tax rate will be ~10% for FY23
- Oaknet’s 50 cr. target EBITDA will be achieved in FY23 vs earlier guidance of FY24. Expanded dermatologist coverage to 90% from 60%
- Oaknet will be amortized over 20 years
- Growth in cardiovascular division has resumed. SGL2 & DPP4 contributes 35-40% to diabetes sales
- The stark difference in primary (10%) vs secondary sales (19%) is because of certain products (probably Zayo, link) which have gone into legal issues, which were already supplied to the market (but are no longer being supplied). So these are captured in secondary sales data but not in primary sales
- Launched 4 drugs (Zomelis D, Glura, Gluxit S & FCM Injection) in H1 FY23
- Aim is to get 18-20 cr. of revenues from insulin in FY23. This will not be a cash burn business in FY24
- Eris standalone PCPM ~ 5.3 lakh, Oaket PCPM ~ 3-3.5 lakh
Disclosure: Invested (position size here, no transactions in last-30 days)
9 Likes
Descent set of Q3 results. Most of the growth attributable to the acquired portfolios in the last 1 yr. PAT is flat despite steep rise in Consolidated Revenues due to higher depreciation, amortisation and employee expenses that come with acquisitions.
Key positive - Acquisition of Derma portfolio of Glennmark Pharma for 340 cr. The portfolio’s last yr sales were at 87 cr. Combined with Oaknet’s ( a Derma Formulations company ) acquisition last yr, Eris is now becoming a serious branded derma player in India. Should be a long term positive.
Disc : holding a tracking position. Biased.
3 Likes
Company came up with mixed set of results (27% sales growth, flat PAT YOY). Organic growth lagged due to loss in sale of 2 molecules, one due to legal issue and other was a covid product. Oaknet has turned out to be a very good acquisition, and this has given them the confidence to acquire 9 derma brands from Glenmark. Concall notes below.
FY23Q3
- Guidance lowered to 25-26% (from 30% earlier) and 14-15% EBITDA growth (lowered from 16-17%) for FY23.
- Zayo revenues was 30 cr. in FY22 which has gone to zero due to legal issue. One more product launched during the 2nd COVID wave (called Zandi) was discontinued (30 cr. revenue contribution in FY22) and there was sales return of 18-20 cr. in 9MFY23
- Acquired 9 medical dermatology brand (anti-fungal & anti-psoriasis) from Glenmark. 3 brands (Onabet, Halovate and Sorvate) are ranked #1 in their respective segments. 3 other brands (Demelan, Dosetil and Aceret) are ranked in top-3 of their respective segments. These brands have declined for Glenmark in past few years, they were considered as non-core by Glenmark
- FY22 revenue base of these 9 brands: 85 cr. (purchased at 340 cr.). Will be financed fully through borrowings (8% rates). Gross margins are 78%+
- Net debt / EBITDA will go to 0.8-0.9x after current acquisition
- 70% of dermatology sales come from medical dermatology and is growing at 9-10%. Eris wants to position themselves strongly there
- Oaknet: 60 cr. at 27% EBITDA margins. 9MFY23: 183 cr. (160 cr. has accrued to Eris) at 24% margins. Will exceed 50 cr. EBITDA in FY23.
- Oaknet had 60% growth in doctor prescription (July, August audit)
- Insulin sales will be around 20 cr. in FY23 (was 6 cr. in Q3; expect 7-8 cr. in Q4). Will burn (-20 cr.) of EBITDA on Insulin. EBITDA burn has come down to (-4 cr.) this quarter. Expect next year to reach 50 cr. in revenues with breakeven EBITDA
- Margins have bottomed out in FY23 and will increase in FY24
- Zomelis reaches 92 cr. MAT in Dec 2022 (#1 rank), Gluxit reaches 51 cr. MAT in Dec 2022 (#2 rank)
- MRs: 3000 (consolidated), 2225 (standalone)
- Tax rate: 9-10% for FY23 and FY24. For FY25, blended booked tax rate will be 27-28%. Cash tax rate will continue to be 17% for next 5-years and booked tax rate will also come to 17-18% over 5-years post FY25
- Trial batches have started in Gujarat. Capex is largely finished. Depreciation will be 9-10 cr. per year
- On 75 cr. of gross block in Guwahati, Eris does turnover of 800 cr (10x fixed asset turns). So with Gujarat facility coming on stream, there will be no requirement of further manufacturing facilities for a long time to come
Disclosure: Invested (position size here, bought shares in last-30 days)
5 Likes
Eris Lifesciences Q3 concall highlights -
Acquired 09 Dermatology brands from Glennmark Pharma
Had acquired Oaket Pharma ( a Derma company ) in May 22
Latest acquisition helps them consolidate their position in Derma Mkt, specially in anti fungal and anti psoriasis mkt
03 of Glenmark’s acquired brands are No1 in their respective segment. 03 others are among top 03
These 09 brands have a revenue base of 85 cr, Acquired for 340 cr, funded via borrowings @ 8pc
Post deal derma contribution for Eris will rise to 13 pc from 07 pc currently
Derma mkt rank to improve to No 6 from No 12 Oaknet’s
Q3 revenues at 60 cr, EBITDA at 27 pc up from 10 pc, pre acquisition
Oakent to clock yearly EBITDA > 50 cr, 1 yr ahead of expectations
Cardio-Metabolic share of revenues for Eris at 54 pc, grew by 15 pc
Eris’s biggest anti-diabetic brands are Zomelis and Gluxit
Derma+CNS+Women’s health - The emerging portfolio for Eris has grown by 15 pc. All three combined form 25 pc of Eris’s revenues
VMN (Vit-Minerals-Neutraceuticals) account for 17 pc of Eris’s revenues. Grew by 19 pc
Added 200 Medical Reps in FY 23
Launched various new and innovative products specially in Cardio-Metabolic space
These led to some compression in Gross Margins
Consolidated sales at 424 cr, up 27 pc
EBITDA at 132 cr, up 12 pc
PAT at 100 cr @ 24 pc net margins!!!
Consolidated EBITDA margins at 32 pc despite Oaknet integration, commissioning of new mfg plant in Gujarat and various new brand launch related investments
Margins to improve next FY onwards
All this growth despite base Qtr having an aprox sale of 10 cr of Covid drugs
Started selling ( new launch ) Insulin this yr. Aim to hit 22-24 cr sales this yr, 50 cr next yr
Currently having aprox 3000MRs. Oaknet may add a few more next yr
Next yr onwards, EBITDA growth to be better than top line growth as most investments are behind
Aim to launch Glargine by Q3 - Q4 next yr
Current consolidated yield of MRs at Rs 5lakh/month
May go for more inorganic opportunities next year as well
No of products going off patent and are likely to be launched next yr in India are quite high in the diabetes space
Disc : holding, biased
4 Likes
Eris’s 7 % revenue is coming from the products which are now come under NLEM policy of government of India. The margin in these products will be declined by 15- 20 %. So overall margin of company may declined 1-3 % in coming quarters. I’m not yet invested but waiting for some price correction to enter.
Eris does another acquisition in derma space, this time valuations paid were quite high (5.5x sales). Call notes below.
16.03.2023
- Acquired 9 cosmetic dermatology brands from Dr. Reddy for 275 cr. (50 cr. primary sales; 5.5x sales; 78-80% gross margins). Higher valuation was paid because growth is higher in cosmetology (15-20%)
- Will be financed through borrowings (8-8.5% variable rate loan). 6 brands in top-5 with 3 brands in top-3. 3 brands have 10 cr.+ annual sales
- Debt will be 850 cr. in FY23, net debt to EBITDA will be 1-1.5x in FY23
- Used string of pearls strategy to build dermatology portfolio targeting portfolio gaps. Now time is to consolidate
- Adding 40-50 MRs to dermatology field force to promote cosmetic dermatology (existing field force is 640 in Oaknet). Cosmetic dermatology is growing faster than medical dermatology
- Eris will rank #3 (7% market share) in covered market in dermatology (Eris now covers 45% of dermatology market), have spent 1265 cr. in building dermatology portfolio. Aggregated revenue is expected to exceed 400 cr. in FY24
- FY24 guidance for Oaknet: 400 cr. revenues at 36-38% EBITDA margins; 5 lakh PCPM
- Contribution from emerging therapies (dermatology + CNS + women’s health) has increased to 28% (from 12%)
- Third party manufacturing is 15-20% for the entire company
Disclosure: Invested (position size here, no transactions in last-30 days)
6 Likes
The question that comes to mind is why glenmark and drl selling despite being in leadership positions in the segment.
Low base
Low growth
Separate mr team
Are possible reasons that come to my mind, leading to a lower ROE.