Balaji Amines Opportunity

Notes from interaction with management of Balalji amines during/after AGM.( there may be few mistakes from my side while noting down the points)

Volume and revenue guidance: 20% volume growth for the year. Revenue we may do more than 1100 cr if everything happens as planned. EBITDA margins will maintain range of 20 to 22% for the year. All raw material hike has been passed on to customers.most of the time it’s passed onto customers quickly without delay.
China: Looks like china capacity has come back to some extent. Probably China govt has allowed factories to run after US tariff announcements to make the industries to survive. But they are definitely stricter with environmental pollution issues and govt is punishing the companies not following guidelines.
Long term contracts: We don’t have any long term contracts with MNCs for supply of raw materials( like Aarti industries).we are only few players/monopoly in certain products ,there is no need to look for long term tie ups.
Effect on Rupee depreciation: BAL is net importer. Rupee depreciation is not good for us. Even though exports may be slightly positive.
NOC/Environmental clearance: File is still with state Govt. It will be reviewed by state committee/ CM soon and later will be sent to central govt. Not only Balalji amines, other 4-5 companies in the same industrial area are facing the problem but everything will cleared soon.Even the NOC for Balaji speciality/planned mega project will be done in few months.

Anti -Dumping duty on DMF: We should have got it two weeks after final hearing. Everything has been done. Due to ongoing auditing by WTO, the process has been delayed. Definitely anti dumping duty will come at what % is we have to see. We are following it closely.
(Even though management has been repeatedly the same thing about NOC and antidumping duty, I felt there are honest efforts from company to solve these issues)

PRODUCTS:
DMF: Present utilisation of DMF capacity is around 30% only(10 to 12k tons) against total installed capacity of 30,000 tons.After antidumping duty we will be able to reach 15 to 20k tons and revenue potential may be 100 cr. presently selling at 85 Rs now compared to 90 Rs few months back. We decided to compete with china imports to some extent till antidumping duty comes.India total consumption of dmf is 46,000 tons /yr.

Morpholine: total capacity with expansion is 10,000 tons. present price 150 -160 Rs.Majority we are exporting. We will able to sell 6 to 7k tons with possible revenue of 100 cr. Demand is bit sluggish now. china slow started producing it again.When china production was low price was 200 Rs/kg. We use to export to china itself…600 tons/700 tons per month. we are one among three producer in world.
Acetonitrile: our capacity 9,000 tons…if we add some equipments, we can go up to 18k tons with presently installed reactor. we have not increased the production as price is very volatile. Its around 140 Rs now from high of 200 Rs.It varies a lot with acrylonitrile production in which it is produced as byproduct. When Acrylonitrile plants shuts down acetonitrile prices will shoot up. Its very difficult to guess the acetonitrile price and market. Our competitor(alkyl amines) also may not increasing the capacity as planned due to volatility associated with price.We are trying to get lab grade/ultrapure grade which is almost double the price and gives good margins. Lab grade acetonitrile price is 250 to 300 rs per kg. Mainly used in laboratories/pharma…etc.
Methylamines: present selling price at Rs.180. We have not seen competition or pricing pressure from competitor alkyl amines.China is not competitor when it comes to methylamine as such. China is having problem in exporting them…they have get separate license for the same and apply six months prior.
_DMAC:_6,000 tons installed capacity. After antidumping duty price increased to 110 rs/kg…presently at 100 rs/kg. Presently we are using around 70% of installed capacity.
DMA HCL: Presently not using the expanded capacity. Earlier capacity(26,000 tons) is enough for present demand.
PVPK: regulatory requirement is high for use in pharma companies.difficult to convince pharma companies to use this instead of importing at higher price.
NMP: capacity:16,000 tons…utilising 9,000 tons…in india we are selling 5 to 6k tons …rest is exports…present price Rs.150 reduced from high of Rs.180.

Balaji speciality chemicals: R&D and product work was going on from 2 years. Started construction 9 months back only. Work is progressing as planned. Will start operation from October. This year BSC will do 100 cr of revenue. In fy 2020 BSC will acheive revenue of more than 400 cr business from the three products. This is conservative estimate at present prices BSC may do 100 cr more than estimate. All three products (EDA,PIPERAZINE & DETA) we are sole producers in India.BSC will get all the support from BAL in terms of distributors/sales team and overheads. The additional expenses are going to be less.
EDA: India is importing 39,000 tons/yr. Its demand by end users is also expanding at 20-25% per year.Expecting its demand to be doubled in few years.This is very important product for us. Technically also difficult. All the MNCs are keeping eye on us to see whether we are going to be successful or not. Installed reactor of 150 tons capacity already,catalyst need to added. Our capacity will be 22,000 tons. Present price is Rs.180-175 expected to reduce slightly.Raw material for the same is monoethanolamine and ammonia at full capacity we will do 500 crs.
Piperazine:10k tons is imported…our capacity will be 5k tons.
_DETA:_2-3 k tons capacity.
BSC also we have applied for Mega project status to get benefit of low power cost and tax refund benefits.

Receivables: Increased to 175Cr as sales also have gone up. Will maintain 70 to 75 days of receivables. Most of our customers will pay as scheduled.If somebody is not paying ontime, additional cost will be added to them. All major pharma/agrochemical players are our customers. Sometimes they pay us in advance.
Raw materials scenario:
Payment deal for oil import from Iran is yet be finalised by Govt. If it’s not going to happen whole industry will face problem with methanol price. Present methanol price is around Rs.30-31. Iran deal will bring the price down.We have passed on the price increase to customers.
Ammonia price around 28 Rs…
Acetic acid price has increased to 65 rs but we have good inventory at the low price of 55 Rs.

For MEGA project by 2021: we have to raise debt of around 150 cr.same amount of money will generate from internal accruals as well. No equity dilution will be done. Infirst phase we are going to produce methylamines,ethylamines and MEPA. around 300 cr investment is required.
IPA is in second phase…
_Cash:_Presently we have around 60-70 cr cash…by next year will be in better position. BAL term loan is almost Nil.(3 cr)?
Hotel : No plan to monetize it presently.its Valued at 150 cr presently and in cash profit now. Loan of around 10 cr will be cleared by next year.
Applied for project in planned pharma city at Hyderabad for 100 acres land.

13 Likes

with reduction in prices, margins might take a hit in coming few quarters.
long term growth prospects remain intact.

Thanks Narendra for posting the AGM notes. We need to watch china situation closely, though in my interaction with other people in the field, I am getting a sense that it will take time for Chinese capacity to come back. And even if they do, they cannot come at previous cost. Also, buyers are looking at alternate to China. As a de-risking strategy. Let’s see how this unfolds. I remain cautiously optimistic on the chemical space, atleast for next 1 year.

3 Likes

Hi Jiten, Thanks for your feedback. Definitely China factor needs to be monitored closely. What I like about BAL is their ability to launch limited no products( when compared to competitor alkyl amines) and able to generate good margins. As per interaction with management EDA seems to be game changer for BAL when it comes on stream, but it is launched through subsidiary BSC. What is ur opinion on their investment in subsidiary companies. In the past they had subsidiaries in different business which has to be closed down due to losses. They seems to be planning for merger of BSC with BAL in few years. From your recent interview I have learnt that you have been invested in BAL for long time, you must be knowing the management pulse to remain invested for long time.

I am sure many would have read https://www.drvijaymalik.com/2017/10/balaji-amines-limited-equity-research-report-analysis.html

This rightly points out unfriendly steps by the management. And in investing, one must learn and understand, how much weightage one has to give to these. My view has always been that management is avg as far as minority shareholder friendliness is concerned. But they are very good at their business. They know how to get things done. And have grown their company from a very very small company (nano-cap) to a smallcap over the years. And it always remained undervalued as far as I am concerned. So, no reason to sell. Over last 5 years, quiet a bit of re-rating has happened in the stock. I am definitely not married to any stock, but in this case, it’s been a very long affair. The chemical sector has tailwinds, so as long as that continues, and price is not in over-valued zone, I will hold. Hope this helps.

12 Likes

No antidumping duty on Dimethyl formamide(DMF)


more details can be found hereContent_dgtr.pdf (602.7 KB)

1 Like

Does somebody know a place to track methyamine and ethylamine prices? i Couldn’t find it googling it.

1 Like

Disc: I have bought over the last 45 days and it makes up >15% of my pf. I am not a SEBI registered advisor. Please do your own due diligence. This is not a buy/sell recommendation.

The rationale for buying Balaji Amines over Alkyl amines and at this specific juncture are as follows:

  1. BAL has 30,000 MTPA capacity of the key intermediate DMA HCL which is required for making Metformin API v/s 13,000 MTPA for Alkyl Amines.
  2. Lack of viable substitutes for DMF which is a key solvent for Pharma/Agrochemicals which satisfy the necessary technical/chemical parameters. Besides DMF capacity is possibly fungible and can be used alternatively for other methylamine derivatives.
  3. BSCL Capex done with the new products being import substitutes (EDA, DETA, Piperazine) or ADD imposed on them (MIPA)

Will go into detail about the first 2 points below.

Lack of substitutes for DMF

https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13641/annex_restriction_dimethylformamide_en.pdf

Click on arrow to get more info

Taking into account the classification of the technically possibly suitable alternatives as compiled in Table B12, and the recommendations by Kerton and ICH (Table B13; Table B14), DMF cannot be reasonably replaced by most of the mentioned substances. NMP, HMPA, DMAc, HMPT, Benzene, Toluene, NEP, NMAc, Formamide, and 2-Furaldehyde are not suitable due to their classification as either Reproductive Toxicant or Carcinogen and/or Mutagen, as it is pointless to substitute DMF by another CMR substance. Although the solvent NBP has proven to be performing as a viable alternative in certain specific applications to existing dipolar aprotic solvents like NMP, NBP is not considered to be a replacement for DMF. The substantial difference in boiling point between DMF and NBP hinders a potential substitution for the aforementioned applications. Furthermore, both Acetonitrile and Tetrahydrofuran are listed as undesirable substance within the ‘green’ alternatives, and are mentioned as Class 2 solvent in pharmaceutical products, i.e. solvents which should be limited. Consequently, those solvent should not be considered as suitable alternative in terms of their intrinsic hazard, too. So, the only remaining substances are DMSO and MEK.

In consequence, regarding worker and consumer protection, DMSO should be the preferred alternative. Nevertheless, both solvents are already used in a number of applications, which are certainly posing suitable alternatives for DMF. However, those solvents are not generally able to replace DMF in all its applications.

Industry also indicated that DMSO is the main long-term alternative to DMF available on the market. Whilst DMSO certainly is not a dropin substitute for all applications, it has a broad spectrum of uses in which it could replace DMF, significantly reducing environment and/or health risk
Today it does not seem to be one single alternative that can replace DMF for all its uses, indicating that an authorization process would clearly eliminate several applications as authorization would make many processes no economically feasible anymore. However, within the above mentioned substances covering the major amount of the applications of DMF, and mainly due to classification issues, it became evident that DMSO is the only alternative relevant for further assessment, which will be performed.

Metformin (Possible Longevity Drug + Anti-Cancer adjuvant)

Approx between 0.5 to 0.65 MT of DMA HCL is required to make 1 MT of Metformin API.

image
Source: http://environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/EIA/61110125912121214-2013.pdf

Other Sources


Source: http://environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/TOR/18_Jun_2016_1617110579E1MTQZDAnnexure-AdditionalAttachments.pdf

Below is the list of rated production capacities globally which i have gleaned from various filings and news reports.

(in MT) Production Capacities
Aarti 14400 20.06%
Granules 14000 19.50%
USV 10100 14.07%
Wanbury 9000 12.53%
Harman Finochem 6000 8.36%
Smruthi Organics 4800 6.69%
Farmhispania 4000 5.57%
IOL CP 4000 5.57%
Vistin Pharma 3100 4.32%
Sohan Healthcare 2400 3.34%
Total 71800

Excerpts from Vistin Pharma filings:
http://www.vistin.com/getfile.php/132303-1525862070/Documents/PDF/Vistin%20Pharma%20-%20Prospectus%20-%209%20May%202018.pdf

Actual metformin consumption in 2013 corresponded to ~50% of the diagnosed population and ~25% of total people with diabetes. The global market for metformin in 2016 was estimated to be ~40,000MT and is expected to grow by 2,000 to 3,000MT annually going forward. There are approximately 25 manufacturers globally with regulatory approval to deliver metformin HCl in the EU and the US. Approximately 65% of the volume is produced in India and there are only two producers in Europe. The current market for metformin is competitive and there is sufficient global capacity to absorb the volume growth as many of the plants producing metformin API are multi-purpose. This is particularly true for the plants in Asia.

8.4 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
8.4.1 Metformin business
The global manufacturing of Metformin HCl is according to Vistin Pharma’s Executive Management approximately 40,000 MT per year, whereof Vistin Pharma is the fifth largest producer with a production volume in 2017 of approximately 3,100 MT (~8% of the global production). 65% of the global volume is manufactured in India.

Given the above commentary and BAL having double the capacity of Alkyl amines for DMA HCL, they are better placed to capture incremental growth of Metformin globally.

Why is Metformin a possible longevity/anti-cancer drug?

With the knowledge I have assimilated so far, one of the primary mechanisms through which Metformin affects the body’s metabolism is by weakly inhibiting Complex I of the ETC (Electron transport chain) in the Mitochondria.
Highly recommended to read Nick Lane’s Power, Sex, Suicide: Mitochondria and the meaning of life

A perfect illustration of one of 3 bucket’s (Biology - The most important bucket IMHO) illustrated by Peter Kaufman:
Every statistician knows that a large, relevant sample size is their best friend. What are the three largest, most relevant sample sizes for identifying universal principles? Bucket number one is inorganic systems, which are 13.7 billion years in size. It’s all the laws of math and physics, the entire physical universe. Bucket number two is organic systems, 3.5 billion years of biology on Earth. And bucket number three is human history, you can pick your own number, I picked 20,000 years of recorded human behavior. Those are the three largest sample sizes we can access and the most relevant. — Peter Kaufman

Also one can observe how nature/time is antifragile and the co-existence of mitochondrial DNA with nuclear DNA is a perfect example of complexity, feedback loops, redundancy and decentralization.

Additional Points

Complex life evolved after a chance event of one bacteria eating another bacteria (Mitochondrial ancestor).
Apart from nucleus, mitochondria is the only other cell organelle with its own set of DNA (13 genes specific to the various complexes in ETC).
Over a period of 2 billion years, nature acted on the competition between 2 competing genome to evolve the initial eukaryotic cell from amoeba to higher and higher complex life forms.
Though we all learn that Mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell, it does far more than that. More important point being that without ATP the basic currency of life, nothing gets done.

Below set of podcasts go in depth on possible mechanisms through which Metformin affects the body.

Metformin in Longevity Study (MILES). (MILES)

Excerpts from above Clinical Trial

Several mechanisms have been shown to delay the aging process, resulting in improved healthspan in animal models, including mammals. These include caloric restriction, alteration in GH/IGF1 pathways, as well as use of several drugs such as resveratrol (SIRT1 activator) and rapamycin (mTOR inhibitor). At Einstein, the investigators have been working to discover pathways associated with exceptional longevity. The investigators propose the study of drugs already in common clinical use (and FDA approved) for a possible alternative purpose -healthy aging. The investigators goal is to identify additional mechanisms involved in aging, the delay of aging and the prevention of age-related diseases. In this proposal, the investigators explore the possibility of a commonly used drug, metformin, to reverse relevant aspects of the physiology and biology of aging.

Metformin is an FDA approved drug in common use in the US since the 1990s. It is the first-line drug of choice for prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). The effect of metformin on aging has been extensively studied, and has been associated with longevity in many rodent models. Metformin also extends the lifespan of nematodes, suggesting an evolutionarily conserved mechanism. A recent high impact study demonstrated that metformin reduces oxidative stress and inflammation and extends both lifespan and health span in a mouse model .

There is also evidence from studies performed both in-vitro and in-vivo of metformin’s role in attenuating tumorigenesis. The mechanisms proposed relate to its effects on reducing insulin levels, improved insulin action, decreased IGF-1 signaling (central to mammalian longevity), as well as activation of AMP-kinase. In fact, metformin’s potential protective effect against cancer has been gaining much attention, with over 100 ongoing studies registered on the Clinical Trials.gov website.

To characterize pathways associated with increased lifespan and healthspan, the investigators plan to compile a repository of muscle and adipose biopsy samples obtained from young healthy subjects and older adults before and after treatment with potential anti-aging drugs. RNA-Seq analysis will be used to identify a unique biological “fingerprint” for aging in these tissues by comparing changes in gene expression in older adults post-drug therapy to the profiles of young healthy subjects. This overall approach is supported by a grant from the Glenn Foundation for the Study of the Biology of Human Aging.

The investigators believe that if metformin changes the biology of aging in tissues to a younger profile, it supports the notion that this drug may have more widespread use - as an “anti-aging” drug.

11 Likes

Comparables analysis:

Taking figures from FY04 to FY11 only, since I could not find the data after FY12 in both the company Annual Reports.

Comparative figures for Alkyl Amines

Despite BAL starting at a lower base, its revenues eclipsed Alkyl Amines by FY11. This repeats across other parameters as well.



Below are statistical comparisons of key ratios

Lower the co-efficient of variation the better it is.
Closer the median is to the mean, better it is.




Comparing the R&D expenditure

Comparing Exports
BAL


Alkyl

5 Likes

Metformin on its own will not suffice to get the longevity or anti-cancer benefits. It will have to be used in conjunction with other lifestyle changes (low carb high saturated fat diets and resistance training). Additionally i don’t think it will be taken chronically rather it would be periodic/cyclical with people taking it for one month and then go off it for 2-3 months.


Source: https://myinvestmentdiary.com/company-analysis/balaji-amines-and-alkyl-amines/

With respect to the fungibility of the DMF capacity towards DMA, please find below report on one of China’s largest producers of DMF (150 K) and Methylamines (150 K)

Excerpts from above report



From BAL EC reports corroborating the possible fungible-ness of the DMF Capacity
http://forestsclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Addinfo/0_0_31111123412171AdditionalAttachment.pdf

Snapsphots of the Flowsheet diagrams of DMF, DMAHCL

image
image
image

Closest comparison globally is Taminco which was acquired by Eastman Chemicals.
(https://www.alvarezandmarsal.com/sites/default/files/joe_coote_ma.pdf):

  1. Established in 2003, as a carve-out from the Belgian pharma company UCB, and purchased by Dutch private equity investor NIB Capital (renamed AlpInvest in 2004) for €115m.
  2. Roll-up included acquiring the amines business of Air Products, nearly doubling the firm’s size and firmly positioning itself geographically as the global market leader in methylamines, methylamine derivatives and higher amines. Other components of the roll-up included businesses acquired from Akzo Nobel and Arkema.
  3. CVC purchased the business in 2007 from AlpInvest for €0.8 billion (~ 7x Ebitda), adding value through operational performance improvement and commercial excellence.
  4. In 2011, CVC sold the business to Apollo for €1.1 billion (~7x Ebitda), which went on to IPO the company on the NYSE in 2013.
  5. Eastman Chemical Co. recently acquired the public entity for $2.8 billion, at a valuation of approximately 10.4x Ebitda, making it the second largest acquisition in the company’s history

http://www.jefferies.com/CMSFiles/Jefferies.com/files/Conferences/081114/PDF%20Presentations/Taminco%20V2.pdf

One point that stood out was that their products grew at 2X GDP.

Key Slides from Taminco in Aug 2014 Prior to acquisition by Eastman



Taminco Dec 2013 10K (last one prior to acquisition)

Highly recommend to read through the 10-K.

2 key points which stood out in the 10-K
  • The average timeline for product development from conception to execution is three to five years.
  • Methylamines are expensive to transport in gaseous form due to their volatile nature and logistical complexity. As such, supply and demand for methylamines is typically matched on a regional basis. Competition in higher alkylamines production is generally regional. With few exceptions, producers tend to focus on producing a small number of higher alkylamines, which results in a limited number of producers of each type of higher alkylamine in each region.

Corroboration of Capacity figures mentioned in Taminco’s 10-K from a 2nd source.

Global Methylamines Capacity as on 2014



image

Source: http://www.methanolmsa.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Appendix-A-Global-Capacities.pdf

Taking the above acquisition multiple of 7X EV/EBITDA, BAL is trading around at reasonable valuation compared to Alkyl Amines

From Screener.in (Alkyl v/s Balaji)

No further posts from me. Have put up all my research findings for your perusal.
Happy to answer any follow up queries of-course which negate the above posted rationale with an open mind.

I am aware of the past di-worsifications of the management. Happy to change my mind as and when the facts change.

Have invested to hold with the mindset of holding it for the next 5 years. Would be re-evaluating every 6 months.
Expectation is that it will be a reasonable compounder.

Regards.

20 Likes

In case of Methylamine and DMF prices, one can track the SGX filings of Jiutian Chemical group:

http://infopub.sgx.com/FileOpen/3Q2018%20result%20announcement.ashx?App=Announcement&FileID=533921

Revenues for 3Q2018 was RMB 289.7 million, a 24% increase from 3Q2017 of RMB 233.3 million, mainly due to increases in selling price of DMF and Methylamine. For 3Q2018, average selling prices of DMF and Methylamine was RMB 5,359 per tonne and RMB 7,971 per tonne respectively, which were 10% and 12% higher than that for 3Q2017. The increase in average selling prices of the products were mainly due to a tighter industry supply arising from production stoppage and cut by other producers for various environmental compliance reasons. Sales volume of DMF and Methylamine in 3Q2018 were 4% lower and 20% higher than that of 3Q2017 respectively.

Between 3Q2017 to 3Q2018, capacity utilisation of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Anyang Jiutian Fine Chemical Co., Ltd. (“Anyang Jiutian”), DMF plant increased from 45% to 58%, whilst capacity utilisation of the Anyang Jiutian Methylamine plant increased from 81% in 3Q2017 to 97% in 3Q2018. Cost of sales increased by 42% to RMB294.1 million in 3Q2018 mainly due to increase in sales volume of Methylamine and increase in cost of raw materials. Gross profit decreased from RMB 26.0 million in 3Q2017 to gross loss of RMB 4.4 million in 3Q2018 and there was a reversal from a gross profit margin of 11% in 3Q2017 to a gross loss margin of 2% in 3Q2018, mainly as a result of a substantial increase in cost of raw materials affected by suppliers’ facilities overhaul during the financial period.

Other income increased by RMB 0.4 million to RMB 1.1 million in 3Q2018 mainly due to higher interest income received during the financial period. Distribution costs increased by RMB 0.8 million to RMB 6.2 million in 3Q2018, mainly due to an increase of transportation costs under Anyang Jiutian in line with higher sales volume of Methylamine during the financial period.

  1. A commentary at the date of the announcement of the significant trends and competitive conditions of the industry in which the group operates and any known factors or events that may affect the group in the next reporting period and the next 12 months.
  • Our main products of DMF and Methylamine started to face margin squeeze arising mainly from a substantial increase in cost of raw materials. The main challenge we faced this year has been the irregular production volumes and product prices of sodium hydrosulfite which was caused mainly by the unscheduled and increasingly frequent industry-wide stoppages imposed by environmental authorities.

  • On a macro front, the Caixin China General Manufacturing PMI fell to a 16-month low of 50 in September of 2018 from 50.6 in the previous month and missing market consensus of 50.5. Concerns continued to mount about the ongoing global trade frictions as well as the near-term impact of strict environmental policies.

  • In view of the above, the business environment will likely remain challenging for the rest of the year. The Group needs to stay vigilant and monitor the market condition closely, adapting its business strategies as and when appropriate.

Other sources:

The Chemours Company (CC - Free Report) is set to hike prices by up to 10% of all Dimethylformamide (DMF), Methylamines, Dimethylacetamide (DMAC) and Dimethyl Sulfate (DMS) products sold in North America. The hike will be effective from Jan 1, 2019.

https://www.eastman.com/Company/News_Center/2018/Pages/Eastman-increases-Methylamines-Solvents-prices-on-Feb-01.aspx

4 Likes

I was wondering on what price to buy, very difficult to value these companies. What i can see is the FCF is stagnant for last four years. This has traded at 4p/e prior to 2014 and was at 7/8 before it went to 20 and then back to 11-12 now, If i use the present FCF and then assume that it compounds for next 10 years at 10% and then business is sold for 15 times fcf, i get a value of 360/(discount rate 12%). I know it is very simplistic, but any other thoughts on a fair price for this business.

1 Like

Q3 FY19 Results

https://www.bseindia.com/xml-data/corpfiling/AttachLive/aedab00a-65fe-4fda-9101-c2e1ddc92d89.pdf

Mgmt Interview
https://twitter.com/BTVI/status/1090122113573253121?s=20


https://twitter.com/Shekhar6511/status/1094152236035465218?s=20

3 Likes

Slide Deck on Balaji Amines presented at Bangalore Investors Group meetup.

Looking forward to opposing views on any of the points posted above.

@ayushmit @hitesh2710 @basumallick Hope you find this useful!

12 Likes

Thanks for the very insightful presentation Vishnu. Really deep research into several aspects.

Any views on promoter quality?

Looks like Balaji Specialty Chem was a separate entity incorporated in 2010 where they have bought 55%. They have said they would more. I presume this would be after enough value has been created to justify paying a higher price than what the company paid for the current 55%. There seems to be an inherent conflict here.

Also they invested capital in the past into a CFL business which hasn’t worked out well and the sub was acquired by Balaji eventually and dissolved.

The patriarch Prathap Reddy is 67 and he seems to have his son, son in law, son in law’s brother in law and nephew in the business with virtually no outside professional in a key role. Slightly odd and hopefully there should be no succession issues. Put together the remuneration is close to 20cr.

Prathap Reddy seems to be in firm control though through his stake directly and through an LLP where the directors besides himself are his son and am guessing his wife.

1 Like

The promotors of balaji speciality chemicals pvt. Limited are themselves…Promotors of balaji amines.history repeats and will repeat…What they did in cfl business…

1 Like

Thanks for compliments and the queries.

I did not want to focus much on the management since most of it is already well known by Mr. Market and I had other qualitative info which may/may not have been factored into.

However, let me summarize my perspective about the Management’s quality (MQ):

  1. Relative to Alkyl Amines (AACL), Balaji has lower MQ given the fact that they are much more aggresive in terms of taking on debt or capacity expansions.
  2. BSCL: Capex cost was 96.2 crores as per the EC Report (if we include land it might be even more). They have paid 66 crores for 55% stake and is now a subsidiary. This year’s AR should include BSCL in consolidated results. So far it looks OK for me. Considering the capex cost, the acquisition amount seems to be fair enough. In contrast Meghmani situation looks far more egregious.
  3. Like I said they are aggressive and seem to be happy to tinker around. As long as these di-worse-fications are a very small part of their overall asset base and they can close them as soon as they realize it is a failure, i am willing to live with this risk. One can expect something unexpected in future as well.
  4. Yes. It does seem to have the involvement of a very extended and joint family. There is indeed a risk of succession planning which one needs to keep tracking. Having said that they have many other unlisted entities which I have not gone into. Depending on how they are performing, the succession risk may be high or low.
  5. Regarding the high remuneration relative to PAT, i think “Context” again matters. At the risk of mistaking “absence of evidence” with “evidence of absence”, the fact that there is not much divergence between CFO, PAT and EBITDA if one looks cumulatively over the last decade, I believe the management’s incentive for higher remuneration is aligned with the need to improve PAT and hence CFO. In the absence of other red flags such as poor debtor days, lots of RPT transactions, I again feel the perception of this risk is not too high.

Again this is just my perspective. We can have differing views and agree there is indeed a management risk one needs to factor. The difference would be how much weight-age each of us gives to it.

1 Like

I am genuinely curious. Was there intentional fraud or was it just a case of business failure due to LED disruption?

When a public listed company buys pvt.limited company of same promoters…The valuation at which they buy.and the context of such buy…Need to be investigated…Promoters create some new business as pvt.limited company…It they succed…They continue…If that business requires capital infusion they may go for a sellout to public listed company…If idea fails…They squeeze out the juice and merge with public listed company…I always keep such things on radar.needs further digging…Many thanks for sharing your details.

3 Likes

hi vishnu,
amazing in-depth analysis of the industry.Love the way you approach the analysis.Keep the good work