@Uservijay Thanks for your opinion.
I completely agree that it is minority shareholder unfriendly. So, no second thoughts on that.
It seems that Whirlpool parent indeed makes decent contributions to nurture Indian subsidiaries success. To put this point I wouldâve to quote some analyst reports [Please view the following attachment. PM me or Google if you need any of these articles].
Endorsement of Parent by Research Houses.pdf (344.2 KB)
P.S. Whirlpool India compensates the parent in two ways: Royalty fee + Technical know-how fee, and this contribution has been around 1.3% over the last 5 years.
1.29% [FY 2014-15]
1.27% [FY 2015-16]
1.2% [FY 2016-17]
1.32% [FY 2017-18]
1.37% [FY 2018-19].
Sorry, but I have reservations against this analogy of stealing.
Whirlpool India hasnât been siphoning out money. It is stated clearly in latest AR that theyâve done it and any attentive investor is capable of noticing it.
But, I can understand where from that is coming.
We the investor community in India have seen enough frauds by publicly listed companies that the general impression has become more skeptic and bitter.
Letâs use a different analogy, one in which the parent and the subsidiaries can be thought of as a family.
Much of Whirlpool Indiaâs strategic acumen, brand visibility and product portfolio can be attributed to its parent, just like a parent in a human family nurtures its offspring.
Now suppose the parent and some siblings are in crisis, canât the family expect the financially stable adolescent offer some help!
We, the shareholders / analysts of Whirlpool India are right to point the act of Whirlpool India minority shareholder unfriendly, just like the kids of that financially stable offspring shouldâve felt.
But, we have to think if the case of lower compensation from the Indian subsidiary, like the nurturing of kids by parent, should be called minority shareholder unfriendly too from the angle of Whirlpool Parent, since it is also publicly traded.
Moving out of the parable, the point I am trying to make is that there are enough positives of Whirlpool India:
- growth visibility.
- Under-penetration of existing and upcoming product portfolio.
- Superior brand image.
- Zero debt
- Decent ROE - ROCE - OPM.
- Technical and strategic competence owing to parentâs vast experience and capability.
etc.
And there has been just one glitch to that image.
We should certainly be thoroughly mindful of this parameter in the coming days but probably shouldnât be dismissive of the story just because one lapse has happened.
I am grateful to this community, however, to point out this transgression, as I am unmindful enough to ignore such minute details.
Disc: I have recently entered this story after a bit of deliberation since this point was put to light thankfully by @kanvgarg123. Whirlpool India is still a small part of my overall portfolio. So, consider me somewhat biased towards it.
P.S. Being an entrepreneur canât help viewing companies and subsidiaries from the perspective of a family.
Fell free to opine against my argument. We are having a healthy discussion here.