Welcome to the New World Order: A Higher-Inflation World — A Probable Scenario Based on Today’s Signals

Over the last few months, global geopolitics around oil has started shifting dramatically. What we may be witnessing is the emergence of a new global energy and monetary order, where oil, shipping routes, and currency dominance are becoming central strategic tools.

Let’s start by looking at what has happened since late 2025.

-–

1. The Three Major Oil Powers Challenging the Dollar

For the past few years, three countries with massive oil reserves have been actively pushing alternatives to the petrodollar system:

Russia

Iran

Venezuela

These countries have increasingly experimented with selling oil in local currencies or non-dollar settlement systems, which directly challenges the traditional petrodollar framework.

If such a system expands globally, it weakens the structural demand for the US dollar, which has historically been reinforced by global oil trade being denominated in dollars.

-–

2. The “Shadow Fleet” – The Lifeline of Sanctioned Oil

Even under sanctions, these countries continued exporting oil through what is commonly known as the “shadow fleet.”

These are:

Older tankers

Often reflagged under different countries

Operating with opaque ownership structures

This fleet became the primary mechanism to move sanctioned crude from Russia, Iran, and Venezuela to buyers such as India, China and other emerging economies.

However, starting late 2025 and early 2026, Western countries began physically seizing vessels linked to sanctioned oil exports, signaling a shift from paper sanctions to direct enforcement at sea.

This marked a significant escalation in the economic battle around oil flows.

-–

3. Neutralizing the First Threat: Russia

Russia had become one of the largest suppliers of discounted crude after the Ukraine war.

However, pressure from sanctions, tanker seizures, and diplomatic pressure on buyers started restricting the flow of Russian oil through the shadow fleet.

Some major buyers, including India, began gradually reducing purchases of discounted Russian crude amid rising geopolitical pressure.

This weakened one of the major pillars supporting the alternative non-dollar oil trade.

-–

4. Venezuela: The Second Front

Venezuela holds some of the largest oil reserves in the world, but sanctions had already constrained its exports.

The US has also moved to intercept vessels linked to Venezuelan oil exports, tightening enforcement around sanctioned energy flows, therefore reducing unsanctioned oil flow from Venezuela.

This again reduced another potential supply base for non-dollar oil trade.

-–

5. Iran: The Final Strategic Theatre

That leaves the third major player — Iran.

Iran sits at the center of one of the most critical oil chokepoints in the world: the Strait of Hormuz.

This narrow shipping route handles roughly 20% of global oil supply passing from the Persian Gulf to international markets.

Recent military escalation between the US-Israel alliance and Iran has pushed the region into a severe crisis.

Iran has threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz and warned that vessels attempting to cross it could be attacked. A prolonged period of tension or disruption around this chokepoint could significantly strain global supply chains while simultaneously supporting higher oil prices—an environment that may benefit higher-cost producers such as the U.S. oil and gas industry.

As a result:

Oil prices have surged sharply

Shipping traffic has dropped

Tankers are waiting outside the Gulf

Insurance costs have exploded

Crude oil has already jumped to its highest level since 2023, with analysts warning prices could cross $100 per barrel if disruption continues.

-–

6. The Strategic Oil Price Problem

One interesting puzzle emerges here.

Despite sanctions on Russia, Venezuela and Iran, oil prices had remained relatively subdued for much of the past year.

For a country like the United States, which has become the world’s largest oil producer, this creates a challenge.

US shale production is relatively expensive, with estimated break-even costs often ranging between $40–$60 per barrel depending on the basin and operator.

Meanwhile, Middle Eastern producers have significantly lower extraction costs.

This means that if oil prices remain structurally low, the profitability of US production declines.

-–

7. The Strait of Hormuz – The Ultimate Chokepoint

Unlike sanctions, the Strait of Hormuz directly affects physical oil supply routes.

If shipping through this route is disrupted:

Gulf oil exports fall

Insurance premiums surge

Tanker freight rates spike

Global supply chains are forced to reroute

Even the fear of disruption can push prices higher because markets immediately price in supply risk.

This is precisely what we are seeing now.

-–

8. The Potential Strategic Outcome

If oil prices stabilize at a higher range for a prolonged period, several structural shifts could happen:

1. Higher oil prices improve the profitability and competitiveness of US oil production, while simultaneously helping keep the growing challenge to the petrodollar system — through local currency oil trade — under control.

2. Importers diversify supply chains away from unstable regions

3. Countries like India may increase imports from the United States despite longer shipping routes

4. The global oil trade may move back toward more regulated and transparent supply channels

However, this would come at a cost.

-–

9. The Inflationary Impact

Higher oil prices directly translate into higher global inflation because energy affects:

Transport

Manufacturing

Fertilizers

Logistics

Electricity generation

For countries like India that rely heavily on imported crude, sustained higher oil prices could lead to imported inflation.

-–

10. The Possible New Market Regime

If this geopolitical environment persists, global markets may be entering a new phase characterized by:

Structurally higher oil prices — where, after an initial spike, crude stabilizes at a base meaningfully higher than the trading range seen over the past 3–4 years.

elevated geopolitical risk premiums

persistent inflation pressures

more fragmented global trade routes

In other words:

Welcome to the new world order — one where energy security, currency dominance, and geopolitics are deeply intertwined.

5 Likes

Nicely explained. But will this have a different effect in terms of pushing the world towards alternative energy? Solar, wind, tidal, chemical, EVs etc.

Sure there is already some action in that space but it’s mostly led by govt initiatives and not by structural constraints. The current episode might push govts. and corporations across the world to reconsider energy sources. It’s an uphill climb surely, because Crude remains the safest (or rather, easiest) option.

Many might wish away the geopolitics and civilisation tensions for millennia, or brush it under the carpet, but long term resilience in energy security has to be built through optionality, not just political or diplomatic manoeuvring.

Too tough to predict. But stocks in the alternate energy space become all the more compelling to watch out for!

1 Like

The shift toward alternative and renewable energy has already been accelerating over the past few years, especially after the Russia–Ukraine conflict. When the war began, Europe suddenly realized the risk of depending heavily on Russian energy supplies. Russia restricted the flow of natural gas and other resources to European nations, which exposed how vulnerable many economies were to geopolitical disruptions in energy supply.

Since then, several countries have been actively pushing the transition toward renewable and domestic energy sources to reduce this dependence.

India is a good example of this trend. The government has been strongly promoting green energy through subsidies, policy support, and large-scale capacity expansion targets in solar, wind, and other renewable technologies. The objective is not only climate-related but also strategic — reducing dependence on imported fossil fuels.

This trend is likely to accelerate further, particularly in countries that are heavily dependent on imported energy such as India, China, and many European nations. These economies are structurally exposed to oil and gas price shocks whenever geopolitical tensions disrupt global supply chains.

One interesting development in India is the growing focus on Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS). Renewable energy sources like solar and wind are intermittent, meaning they cannot produce electricity continuously throughout the day. BESS projects are being developed to store energy and supply power when renewable generation drops.

Even in recent management commentary from companies like Larsen & Toubro, there have been indications that large BESS projects are gaining traction alongside a revival in thermal power investments. Thermal plants are being used to support grid stability while storage systems help bridge the gap toward round-the-clock renewable power.

In other words, countries are trying to build energy systems that are more resilient and less vulnerable to geopolitical shocks. This does not necessarily mean abandoning fossil fuels immediately, but rather creating a diversified energy mix that includes domestic renewable capacity, storage infrastructure, and strategic backup generation.

Ultimately, energy security is becoming just as important as energy transition. Governments are increasingly prioritizing systems that allow them to rely more on resources they can control domestically rather than being overly dependent on imported energy.

Because of this, the push toward renewable energy, storage technologies, and grid modernization is likely to remain a long-term structural theme across many major economies.

Many renewable and alternative energy stocks have already seen significant re-rating over the past few years. A large part of this began after the Russia–Ukraine war, when Europe realized the risks of depending heavily on Russian energy supplies.

At the same time, post-COVID recovery policies across the world pushed governments to invest aggressively in green energy through subsidies, incentives, and large capacity targets.

According to my opinion (I may be wrong as you know markets are all about probability and connecting dots) Because of these developments, markets have already anticipated much of this structural shift. While the renewable transition will likely continue to accelerate, a meaningful part of this theme may already be partly priced into several stocks in the sector.

2 Likes

Yes, that’s a great build, thanks. Purely from a valuation standpoint, if it’s already priced in, then there is limited upside.

However, it still remains a space to watch, keep current valuation aside. The whole space has a lot of potential. Probability is not just a function of the markets but one of the business landscape as well.

Like I said, tough to predict given companies and govts. have invested billions already into fossil fuels for a long time, and their incentive would be to place hurdles towards a seamless transition towards renewables. But then the renewable narrative is gaining momentum. Let’s wait and see.

1 Like