South West Pinnacle Exploration

3 Likes

Hey I do not understand sector much, so could you please shed some light on which companies will benefit the most? Is it negative for southwest?

ONGC’s global tender worth up to $20 billion to hire deepwater drilling rigs is neutral for Southwest Pinnacle.
But sentimentally it is positive for the company as this move reflects India’s committment to exploit domestic natural resources, of which SWPE is a benificiary.

2 Likes

As the Govt. has recently announced the huge plan for Coal Gasification, my understanding is that this company might be a direct or indirect beneficiary of this. Does anyone have any view regarding this?

In last Concall, management explicitly mentioned UCG (Underground Coal Gasification) opportunity. They also clarified, it’s still in discussion phase rather than concrete orders.

If UCG do get tailwind (very likely due to Govt push on overall coal gasification, and especially because it’s highly advantageous over surface coal gasification), SWPE do have an advantage due to their expertise in CBM (Coal Bed Methane) process. They are running a large CBM contract with reliance.

CBM and UCG technologies are sequential. Operators will first extract the easily accessible Coal Bed Methane from a seam. Once the methane is depleted, they may use Underground Coal Gasification on the remaining solid coal to extract its residual energy.

Right now, I think SWPE will be in the leading position among contractors who can quickly get in to UCG.

Discl: Not invested. Tracking SWPE and peer Asian Energy in the O&G + Mineral exploration space

1 Like

This is from their latest investor presentation.

I have done a detailed deep dive on the business (but very lazy to write in detail). To me it seems mispriced (correct me if wrong). Some key points I am writing here:

  1. They have 5 rigs in pipeline four of which will be delivered in 3-6 months (from concall).

  2. All there rigs are fully deployed. The demand is so high that they have to hire or subcontract extra 10 rigs for deployment.

  3. The rigs, once fully depreciate, directly adds revenue to bottomline (operating leverage). One of the reasons they have extraordinary growth in PAT in FY26.

  4. Current orderbook: 581 Cr (2.4x of FY 26 revenue).

Right now market is valuing it on the basis of exploration business which is clearly in upcycle.

What the market might not be pricing in:

  1. They own Jogeshwar & Khas Jogeshwar coal block in Jharkhand. This acc to management should start commercial production from FY28. Peak revenue potential: 300-400cr (EBITDA MARGIN: more than 40%).

  2. The two JVs in oman can also contribute meaningfully but not in immediate future.

  3. The management have guided for 15-20% growth till FY30 in one interview only for exploration business. They are doing more at this point of upcycle. With operating leverage PAT growth can be even more.

Antithesis:

  1. High debtor days (catering to Govt Clients). However, management focussing more on orders from private players now: like recent big order from Hindustan Zinc). Key monitorable.

  2. Receivable growth more than revenue growth.

Thats all from lazy me.

Any addition/discussion would be appreciated.

Disc: Biased, Invested. New to equity market, non-finance guy.

6 Likes

Thanks for the summary. To build on your key points, below were mentioned in the latest conference call:

Company has participated in tenders worth 500 to 700 crores.

SWPE’s current market share for hydraulic rigs is 30%

Disclosure: Invested

2 Likes

Thanks. Do you see any scope of valuation re-rating if orders from private client increases??

In my opinion valuation re-rating were to take place in any business, depends on revenue growth and quality of earnings growth. In this case it would be the same. As private or public clients should not be a concern as long as they recover their dues.

Management in their earlier con call was confident and mentioned this:

Yes. On the revenue front management has a track record of underpromise and over-delivering. I think if management can get a order regarding Coal Gasification, this can be the trigger.

1 Like

Important devlopment:

updates.pdf (309.6 KB)

1 Like

Yeah but many companies have been selected for the same.

Yes. You are right. But for me this is an additional bonus for southwest, kind of an optionality. This was not their main contributing vertical in FY26, specially for oil. They are more engaged on the coal side. Am I right or missing something?

2 Likes

South West Pinnacle Exploration won a 15-month CBM production contract extension from Reliance Industries worth over Rs. 166 Crore, lifting the order book beyond Rs. 760 Crore and providing revenue visibility over next two to three years.

Source: Press Release

Is there a co-relation between recent Promoter selling and warrants issue to Promoter and others?

1 Like

Warrants were issued a while back and at the lower prevailing price, the equity infusion would be in the company. Selling is via open market at the higher current market price. There does not seem to be any ill-intent on part of the promoter. Hope that answers your query.

Your answer is correct and obvious.

I did not just look into that from an ill intention perspective rather in a holistic way.

One possible reason could be to avoid mandatory open offer rules of SEBI where if a promoter increases shareholding in a year by more than 5% than they need to mandatorily launch an open offer.

Yes. There definitely is. I checked the quantum of buy and sell. They sold shares worth 32 odd crore and subscribed to warrants at half the price of 21 crore. I suspect the deadline of subscribing to warrants must have been nearby or they would have lapsed. While not illegal I didn’t like this behaviour of promoters. The purpose of warrants is generally to increase ones stake and/or give liquidity to the company. Here it’s to make money

1 Like