You are validating his point about being news reader again. US didn’t go into blanket tariffs without a plan, the 90 day pause was pre-planned.
You know rest of the plan with reasonable certainty ? If so, please enlighten us ? Opinion pieces are also welcome for news readers like myself .
These are the plans of Donald Trump. Some have been implemented and others will happen later.
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/agenda47
Agenda 47 - Wikipedia(styled%20by%20the,president%20of%20the%20United%20States.
Important ones
Agenda47: Returning Production of Essential Medicines Back to America and Ending Biden’s Pharmaceutical Shortages
As part of my plan to obtain total independence from China, we will phase in tariffs and import restrictions to bring back production of all essential medicines to the United States of America where they belong. I signed an executive order to begin this process in 2020 but Biden has shamefully failed to follow through.
Agenda47: Cementing Fair and Reciprocal Trade with the Trump Reciprocal Trade Act
Under the Trump Reciprocal Trade Act, other countries will have two choices—they’ll get rid of their tariffs on us, or they will pay us hundreds of billions of dollars, and the United States will make an absolute FORTUNE
Agenda47: Day One Executive Order Ending Citizenship for Children of Illegals and Outlawing Birth Tourism
As part of my plan to secure the border, on Day One of my new term in office, I will sign an executive order making clear to federal agencies that under the correct interpretation of the law, going forward, the future children of illegal aliens will not receive automatic U.S. citizenship.
Hi Devesh ji, I say this with sincere respect, so please don’t take it the wrong way. I’m not looking to argue—just responding in good faith, as the last line of your post called for members to share their views.
A couple of points regarding your post:-
-
“The way he called all of us ‘news-readers’” - I don’t believe he took specific names or explicitly referred to everyone as such. So to say it discouraged thousands of youngsters on this platform may not be entirely accurate—at least not till proven otherwise.
-
“Now that Trump has given a pause of 90 days on the tariffs” – If we disagree with someone’s comments on the forum and wish to raise a concern, should raising that concern depend on our perception of whether they were right or wrong? For instance, if there had been no 90-day pause, would this post still have been made? The starting line of the post doesn’t make it seem so.
Given these points, I’m unable to agree with the intent and premise of this post and don’t feel there’s a need to report Sahil’s posts.
Trump is finally getting some sane advise from his team it seems as envisaged earlier.
A 90 days pause (if it stays) will pave the way for better negotiations. Its just a pause and not a repeal of the tariffs. This could be a win scenario for India if the Chinese keep retaliating Trump ego.
For the earlier posts which have already been deleted :
We need to be matured to move on from smaller things. They are noise. The objective should be to filter them and look for valuable information which helps in our own decision making rather than finger pointing others.
Not in support of reporting the post for a small overdose of overconfidence. Can be easily ignored.
Now that Trump has given a pause of 90 days on the tariffs and lowered it for all other countries except China, and it is abundantly clear that this wasn’t some larger than life, conspiracy theory-esque way of changing the global order in one day, I want to call out the behaviour that Sahil demonstrated on this thread earlier.
And is basing a counterargument on a single, isolated event considered “scientific”?
While I appreciate your concern for the “young” members, I would like you to self reflect on your post and find the contempt you have shown.
Rallying others to back your personal agenda is nothing but thinly veiled activism better suited for labour unions than on the Valuepickr platform.