Page industries

Another excellent quarter from Page

  1. Q4 revenues are up 26.2%, while volume growth was 8.7%.
  2. Operating profits grew 61% in the quarter backed by volume growth lead operating leverage.
  3. EBITDA margins touched 24%
  4. Announced a ₹70 per share 4th interim dividend for the year. Dividend per share for fy22 will be ₹370 (~410 crores)
  • Full-year (fy22) revenues are up 37% (volume growth - 29%)
  • Operating profits grew 52% and EBITDA margins were 20.2%. GM ~40%
  • 110k MBOs, 1130 EBOs and 2800 LSFs spread across 2850+ cities
  • Speedo: 1,340 stores, 26 EBOs and 12 LSFs spread across 90+ cities

Q4-FY22 results
Investor presentation

Concall highlights:

VSG (CEO):

  • growth was broad-based (distribution, modern trade and ecom)
  • digital initiatives, new product launches, retail expansion, and agile supply chain were the drivers of growth
  • the supply chain is back on track
  • experienced very high inflation trend (including packaging, logistics and cotton); measured price increase and optimum use of inventories sufficed our margins in spite of the inflationary pressures
  • all categories are growing; equal focus on t3 and t4 cities as with t1 and metro
  • speedo is back on track
  • 27k team members, channel and supply partners were working very closely with us
  • outlook very very bullish; firing on all cylinders to continue and sustain growth

KC (CFO):

  • the best ever financial year in history
  • gross margins at 43%
  • building high inventory; hence cash down to 283cr (vs 435 cr fy21)
  • the net-working capital is 631.7 crores (vs 512.8 crores in FY21); nwc days have come down to 60 days
  • inventory stood at 950cr (vs 554 cr)+ at 92 days vs 71 days

Q&A:

inventory levels change of 150 cr+ vs Q3

  • during the pandemic, we had to dig to reserves (inventory); most stock is high-selling stock making sure there are no opportunity losses like we had last year

any new price increases taken/planned?

  • price increase of 8-9% in Q3 and 5% in Q1; no further price hike since December

gross margins dropped by 200bps but ebitda margins up by 500bps, any explanation for the same?

  • price increase was 8% in Q3 lead to higher margins; operating leverage kicked in q4 (opex as a % of revenue has gone down)
  • we are fine with 40% gm and 20-21% was ebitda margins

Volume growth for the quarter and full year?

  • volumes for q4: 50 vs 46; 191 vs 148 for full year

revenue mix?

  • we have stopped sharing that; growth is similar across categories. Athleisure was higher during the pandemic

ebitda margins sustainability at 24%?

  • margins are dictated by input costs, we are always a value for money brand for consumers; costs (raw material costs) are beyond our control as of now, can’t say for sure if we can maintain these margins

raw material inflation?

  • yarn prices have doubled in the last 14 months; still seeing further upward trends in prices as of Q4

sales and marketing spends are up this quarter, can we control this?

  • not stopping this; they are very essential for the brand to capture the shelf space
  • we have implemented automation to enable leadership manage better productivity; discretionary spends like travel are in control, to strengthen our leadership, new CPO (Ravi Kumar) has been onboarded

query on the productivity of existing stores after 45-50k store addition, how’s the repeat orders and productivity of new stores?

  • entire distribution is bottoms-up where we see demand/customer base; it is strategic. we do check if the outlet justifies our brand. New store repeat orders are above 80%, productivity in the second year is higher with bookings coming from other segments
  • a target of 1.5lakh+ stores in two years

other expense is 11% vs 16% average, what lead to this and is it sustainable?

  • no moderation of overheads; all the expenses have grown but as a percentage of revenues is down; 2.5% in ads for the last two years

can we expect higher margins due to Athleisure coming in?

  • we will be happy with 20-21% ebitda margins, don’t want to increase prices further. Want to compensate due to better operating efficiencies

kidswear trajectory?

  • growth in-line with other categories; merged with Women’s in retail touchpoint. Present across 25% of the retail touchpoints

metro vs t1 vs rural markets? any pressure points in rural markets due to higher pricing?

  • growth is similar across all segments (metro, t1 and rural); opportunities are higher in t3 and t4 cities
  • EBOs registering double-digit same-store growth

rural - select few products at affordable prices; are they present in other stores as well?

  • there are no specific products for rural, all products launched in rural markets are available in cities too

international markets?

  • seeing huge potential; dedicated leadership. Focus on the middle east (mainly EBOs, up from 4 to 8)*; Sri Lanks is struggling. International is 1% of revenues. It is a franchise-based model like we do in India, the only change is that the partner would manage multiple channels

revenue growth, volume growth target for next 2-3 years?

  • we have set a target of $1bn by 25-26 (we may even accelerate). We are now looking at aspirations of $2bn and beyond
  • fy22 was the first time we took two price increases; the outlook is based on input cost inflation. Happy to see that premiumisation is happening as we expected

capacity, utilisation and expansion plans?

  • utilisation is close to 80% (in-house); capex plans in-line with 3-year growth plans
  • Odhisa plant will be operational by q4 fy23
  • target: 70-30 (in-house vs outsourcing). Mostly we will stick with the same vendor partners for outsourcing. Currently, outsourcing is 33%

speedo recovery?

  • we see long term potential in the brand; prudent for us to stay invested. Even with the reduction in EBOs, volumes are flat and early days w.r.t profitability. India is the fastest-growing swimwear market

store expansion in fy22: MBO (Gagan) up 42% and EBO (Rahul) in 21%; how do we prevent cannibalization of sales?

  • MBOs expansion was done by geotagging existing presence; we only expanded new stores strategically to service the customer better. Existing stores have grown (sales) too along with the new stores. Growth is healthy double-digit; we monitor it monthly

dividend distribution policy?

  • 50% of PAT (also a function of cash; higher sometimes like we did in 2019)

fixed asset turns?

  • 12 to 13; should be stable even with the upcoming plants in Odisha

  • existing capacities are not good enough to serve the increasing demand, hence we are increasing capex; we mostly manufacture elastic too for backward integration. We have planned investments looking at long term; no brownfield, greenfield expansions only

is our customer base expansion low versus our volume share gain ?

  • we are getting more wardrobe-shelf of the same customer due to increasing wallets, more products ; also onboarding new customers

Is any downtrading seen in the customer base due to high inflation?

  • we don’t have a high asp; sell essential products; relevant across the year. Customers can downgrade seasonal products but we see this as an opportunity
7 Likes

Update: Promoters have initiated a second round of selling within a year. They have sold 1.36 lakh shares (~1% of the outstanding shares) in the month of June aggregating to a value of ~560 crores

Before June 2021, the promoter holding was 48.32% which should now be down to 46.11% after two rounds of selling

While the FII shareholding has remained at 25%, the 2% difference has been absorbed fully by the DIIs who now hold a little more than 17% of the co. SBIMF has been a major buyer of Page for the past 1-2 years and they hold ~7.8 lakh shares which is more than half of the total shares held by the mutual funds

edit - added shares sold on June 29th

source - bseindia

5 Likes

Hi Vinay

My opinion -

If some one is tracking Page recently, It’s a bit disconcerting to see this because of how promoters of many ill managed small & mid cap companies play with their stocks. Even considering a recently listed tech stock doing gymnastics & testing business models with shareholder money.

Very poor capital allocation is the albatross around the neck for majority of the listed companies.

however

Page Industries is a true exception as promoters have been selling their stakes right from 700 rupees a share (they sold 10% stake to Nalanda at 700/-). Sunder Genomal is as high quality a promoter one can get. So, in this case alone promoter selling shouldn’t flutter much feathers.

The only issue with Page industries is the sky high valuations it trades even during leanest times (I believe it deserves it). So the buy or sell decision in short term should be based only on risk: reward vs. future growth projections.

I have written time & again extensively on Page industries for its growth metrics, exceptional return ratios (RoE/RoCE > 50%), 50% of EPS as dividends, excellent franchise it has built.

To re-iterate, based on ones time period of holding, Page share can cut both ways - particularly when so many stocks have corrected meaningfully compared to Page.

I think you did a good job holding this through thick & thin and following the company’s results through con call every quarter.

Disclosure: I re-entered Page recently at 39,500/- for long term with an open mind of 10-15% correction in medium term. I have been guilty of trading in & out of Page but this time I bought with a purpose as indicated in my portfolio page. I have also bought Delhivery at 495 recently.

10 Likes

There are no other competitors with healthy enough ROCE. Sad state of mid sized income households and possibly lux rupa have been really bad at managing companies.

3 Likes

Thats correct! Page industries is an excellent business but valuation is a spoilsport for anyone to enter.

Any thoughts why promoters are selling stake? why shall an investor buy, if its promoters themselves are selling stake on regular basis? what’s rationale behind this regular selling?

“Page has crossed 1000 today without making any noise.This inspite of all the promoter selling.”

http://www.theequitydesk.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1578&PN=73

Page Industries Q3 concall ( Jockey + Speedo ) -

Q3 sales at 1223 cr, up 3 pc yoy

Volumes down 11 pc yoy

Margins also down. Compression due high cost RM purchased previously

Also, lower absorption of fixed costs due volume de-growth led to higher percentage of Op-expenses

Resumed normal A&P spends

Current EBOs - 1228, MBOs - 1.2 lakh, 2900 LFS (like-Central,Lifestyle etc)

Secondary sales were better than primaries in Q3

EBITDA at 193 cr, de-grew by 23 pc

PAT at 123 cr, de-grew by 29 pc

Q4 demand still not back with full force

Expect recovery in Q1 FY 24

Effect of lower cost inventory should start flowing in from Q4

Company continues to be aggressive on EBO/MBO distribution expansion. Strongly believe that slowdown is a short term phenomenon

Kids products growing as per plan

In house vs Outsourced production at aprox 67:33

Focussing on Middle East mkts for exports. Not going after Sri Lanka and Nepal at the moment due macro turbulence

Current number of rural only distributors at 150… double vs last few years. Rural expansion drive to continue

Slowdown in Q3 was more in athleisure, out of home categories. Men and Women undergarments continued to grow in single digits

High cost inventory almost consumed fully as we speak. However, capacity utilisations need to improve for meaningful margin recovery

A&P spends at 4 pc

Disc: not invested. Planning to take up a tracking position

4 Likes

Is this not concerning? Why are volumes down in double digits for a very basic category. Understand undergarments did grow in single digits (volume or revenue?) but still the kind of athleisure Page deals with is very basic and I would have imagined that to only grow manifold with opening up and also with awareness and entry of Jockey into this segment…surprised that volumes degrew…

Tricky Question actually. A part of it was due to channel stock rationalisation that Page did. That’s why secondary sales were higher than primary.

Some of it can also be attributed to bumper Q2,Q3 last year as Q1 and Q4 last year were really muted due covid.

And the rest can be explained by ppl going slow on innerwear spends and going heavy on travel, outdoor spends etc as can be seen in the results of Hotels, top line of Airlines etc

Lets hope for the best wrt Q1. Q4 also looks muted as per the management.

3 Likes

It seems that, most of the people have not understood that, inflation above 6% or 7% is actually quite high and is impacting margins of many companies.

Volumes and Margins of few B2C companies can see this impact.

I have mentioned in thread on HDFC AMC that, AUM growth is also muted in last one year, not just due to Market correction but people are not able to save much in the last one year. Those who might have lost jobs from certain COVID impacted industries have not yet got their jobs back. I can see this while talking to some of my friends as well.

All in all, job losses and high inflation both are impacting certain companies and sector, in my opinion.

I may be wrong in my analysis as I am not certified personal finance expert.

Page industries P/E is around 61 and will increase to around 75 with the profits decline. So valuation might have to fall further.
FYI - it was around 48 P/E in the Mar 2020 low

1 Like

https://www.financialexpress.com/industry/page-industries-q4-profit-falls-58-9-at-rs-7835-crore-due-to-lesser-consumption-revenue-down-128/3101829/

Unwarranted moves in Page Indus. This was expected but a tad bit exaggerated by the market.
Also, Saurabh explains the reason for Page in this interview

1 Like

Page Industries Q4 concall Highlights -

Q4 FY 23 results vs Q4 FY 22 vs Q3 FY 23

Sales - 969 vs 1111 vs 1223 cr

EBITDA - 134 vs 267 vs 193 cr

Margins - 14 vs 24 vs 16 pc

PAT - 78 vs 191 vs 124 cr

Volume de-growth @ 14 pc YoY and 19 pc QoQ

Page Industries Q4 concall Highlights-

Q4 FY 23 results vs Q4 FY 22 vs Q3 FY 23

Sales - 969 vs 1111 vs 1223 cr
EBITDA - 134 vs 267 vs 193 cr
EBITDA Margins - 14 vs 24 vs 16 pc(mainly due poor Opex absorption)
PAT - 78 vs 191 vs 124 cr

Volume de-growth@ 14 pc YoY and 19 pc QoQ

Distribution reach - 1.2 lakh MBOs, 1289 EBOs and 24 LFS partners ( like - Lifestyle, Spencers, Reliance Retail, Metro etc )

E-Com business up 34 pc in Q4 (YoY)

Had the revenues been at previous year levels, EBITDA would have been around 17-18 pc

Inventory at distributor/retail level had become extremely lopsided due channels buying whatever was avlb during pandemic vs what the Mkt wanted

Company implementing Auto Replenishment System (ARS) across India which is a very complex exercise and bound to cause shorterm pain

This is a major transformation for the company and is causing inventory de-stocking across the channel partners

The Mkt weakness is further worsening the situation

Company seeing some improvement already

In all probability, the worst is behind

Don’t see a need for price cuts right now

Most of high cost cotton inventory expended

Secondary sales were better than primary sales in Q4 as ARS implementation ensured slower replenishment of inventories

Demand weakness across categories wrt company’s products

Clear shift of demand from inner wear and athleisure to outerwear being witnessed in the Mkt

Aim to get back to 18-20 pc EBITDA band for FY24

Not going to cut back on advertisement, continue to be very bullish-long term

Company’s mkt share in Men’s inner wear at 17-18 pc. Has ample headroom to grow. Athleisure mkt share is in single digits

Inventory at trade level now at 45-50 days, basically at normal levels. Inventory at distributor level is also 45-50 days (got corrected by 20 days in Q4)

However, distributor level inventory is still a little lopsided due pandemic led supply-demand mismatch brought out earlier

Launched Denim category in Q4…well received by the Mkt

Gross Margins at 38 vs 41 pc YoY. 39-40 pc is the normal range for the company

Have created separate division for accessories like Towels, Socks, Caps etc due huge headroom for growth

As the demand recovers, Jockey should be the Quickest off the block …management is confident about it

Aim to grow faster in womenswear due lower base

Disc: initiated a tracking position post the fall in stock price
Hunch : the worst is over

8 Likes

Page FY23 AR notes:

KPI:

FY23 FY22 Change Remarks
# Emp. 23,853 27730 -14.0%
EBO 1289 1131 14.0% 48 exclusive “Jockey Woman” EBOs and 78 exclusive “Jockey Junior” EBO’s.Plans to expand at 200-250 EBOs Y-o-Y.
LFS 3062 2800 9.4%
Retail Points 120060 110548 8.6%
  • E-commerce business experienced significant growth
  • Short-term goal is to reach a billion dollars in revenue
  • In the long run, we aspire to maintain our position as the undisputed leader in the Premium Segment in terms of revenue, profitability, and brand strength in Innerwear, Athleisure, and Accessories across Men, Women, and Kids.
  • Product premiumisation and innovation like the 1-mile-wear in athleisure, and cracking the code for women’s innerwear, especially bras, has given the Company a headroom for growth
  • The Company faced very high inflationary trends impacting nearly all costs including cotton, packaging, fuel, and logistics.With the cotton prices now softening, the Company has managed to partially offset the trends and hold on the margin strengths with calibrated pricing actions, strong budgets and control measures and optimum use of inventory.
  • The Company put its Auto Replenishment System (ARS) on hold due to the volatility created by changes in product demand mix and supply chain challenges through the pandemic. This meant that the distributors were free to order based on availability and based on the best judgment, resulting in an imbalance in the channel partners’ inventory. During the year under review, the ARS was reinstated and is now being implemented in full, which, we believe will help in correcting imbalances and not only streamline supply chains, but also help in improving the ROI of the channel partners while improving order fulfillment to retailers.

EXPANSION AND NEW INVESTMENTS

  • The tape dyeing unit expansion of 35,000 Sq.ft in Hassan is planned to be commissioned by Q2 of the current financial year, which is aimed to meet the market requirement of women’s dyed elastic.
  • The ‘Cup Molding & Hook n Eye Forming’ projects are a crucial part of women’s bra manufacturing. These projects are also expected to commence during the second quarter of the current financial year and will reduce our import dependency while focusing on improving quality, lead time and cost.
  • To meet the demand in the premium vertical, the Company is planning to add 200,000 Sq.ft of Cut-toPack facility at K R Pete. The commissioning of this facility is expected during the end of this financial year.
  • Our flagship Odisha Project would be ready by end of FY’24 which shall complement Modern Classic growth, and is slated to be one of largest projects built at 28.5 acres campus, with a built-up area of 6.5 lakhs Sq.ft. This facility will encompass Central Stores, Cut-to-Pack, and Elastics & Socks manufacturing
  • The Company is also expanding its socks capacity with an addition of 215 advanced knitting machines. With the proposed expansion, the capacity will have 576 knitting machines.
  • The Company added two third-party logistics warehouse facilities at Hoskote and T Narsapura in Bangalore

PROSPECTS

  • With our strong in-house product development, back-end capabilities, manufacturing expertise and our continuously evolving state-ofthe-art technology, combined with a very strong distribution network, we remain optimistic about the prospects of the brand and expect continued healthy sales growth and profitability in the coming years, further consolidating our position in the premium market for Innerwear, Athleisure, Socks, Swimwear & Swim equipment.

Contingent liabilities

  • During the current year, the Company has received demand order amounting to 1,271.05 million (including fine and penalty 896.97 million) from Commissioner of Customs. The Company has deposited 32.61 million (31 March 2022: 30.00 million) under protest. The Company has filed an appeal before Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The management believes that the Company has duly complied with all the valuation rules and based on the legal opinion, is reasonably confident of favorable outcome in the matter.
11 Likes


New Launches that do make sense.

PAT more than doubled

Year on year revenue and profit has de-grown. Can’t do QoQ comparison in Page.

1 Like

Look 2 Qtr ago. That is not comparable too.
Like to Like comparison is difficult in many. So compare but by knowing all the scenarios from last Qtrly results.