unfortunatEly there are just red signals not barricades. Everyone need to take own call. Promoter has no skin. Also if minority is not taken care why in future things will be different is to be answered. Is company transparent , did they announce breach on exchanges. Or you heard from somewhere else. If answer is no why future will be different.
1 Like
Currently everyone is losing money but good to remember these cases in next upturn.
Case study - 2
Stalled Filmi-Chemicals Company (SFC)
January 2025 â IPO
Buzzword: Semiconductor and specialty
Narrative: Structural growth, import substitution, long runway.
May 2025
Analyst: Can you provide an update on the capex for the Timbaktu plant?
Management: We received IPO funds only towards the end of February. March was a strong month, so we prioritised growth over capex.
Share Price: âš65â75
August 2025
Analyst: Update on Timbaktu capex?
Management: At Timbaktu, we realised we can build a plant with 2x capacity, so we had to redesign everythingâhence the delay. Also, weâve received land from the government at Rajaplace. Phase 1: 5,000 MT Phase 2: Another 5,000 MT This will enable backward integration and improve margins. Overall capex is now ~3x the original IPO plan.
The Investorâs Brain: Capex from 1X to 3X = 3x revenue, 4x profits (higher due to backward integration). Bingo. Multibagger alert.
Share Price: âš115â140
October 2025
Analyst: Update on Timbaktu and progress at Rajaplace?
Management: Timbaktu capacity is now being expanded to 2.5x the original planâhence further delay. At Rajaplace, weâve decided to execute full 2x capacity in one go, instead of two phases.
The Investorâs Brain: Capex from 1X at IPO to 3.5X now. Thatâs 3.5x revenue and 4.5x profits. Capacity coming faster. Even better!
Share Price: âš250â400
Side Show: Promoter A(ffu)CTION
OctoberâNovember 2025: Promoters sells shares in the âš300â400 range.
Company Press Release: Promoter sold shares to provide an interest-free loan to immediately begin the Rajaplace project. This reflects strong promoter confidence and commitment.
The Investorâs Brain: What integrity! Sacrificing personal upside for the company. Lending interest-free money. Salute to such management. i am sold on management i am buying more.
February 2026 â Reality Check
Analyst: Last time you said Timbaktu would start in January. Now the presentation says March.
Management: Design changes due to size increase caused delays earlier. This time, material from the US didnât arrive. Commissioning should happen in March or April.
Analyst: Youâre raising money through a rights issue?
Management: Yes, our capex plans went up, so we need additional capital.
Analyst: You had sold stake earlier to fund Rajaplace capex.
Management: Yes, and weâll get shares for that money.
(analyst & investor what?)
The Investorâs Brain (No Brain? Finally realisation?):
Promoter sold shares at âš300â400. I bought at those levels, believing âbigger plansâ and âselfless promoterâ. Promoter converts into shares at sub-âš100 via the rights issue. Iâm stuck at lower circuits, no exit.
Share Price: âš175â200 down 50% from top
The Final Shock
Analyst: I notice that IPO funds are still unutilised.
Management: Yes, work is ongoing. We never pay in advance.
Investor & Analyst (together):
You donât pay in advance, yet you raise more money? You havenât utilised IPO proceeds, yet raise capital? Rights issue is priced at below 100 ~50% discount to CMP? intent?
21 Likes
Taking the âOther Sideâ - The Cash Conundrum
A friend of mine â an IITian and a very sharp individual â recently told me that in January 2020 he was convinced that the market would fall sharply in the months ahead. By the end of that month, he had already sold all his mutual funds and investments because he believed that what was unfolding in China with COVID would inevitably spread to India and the rest of the world.
He was right. He could see the risks building well before most people did.
He wanted to go short, but he did not know how to short the market. Even today, he feels that if he had known how to do it, he would have made a fortune.
But that is not where the story ends.
At first, I thought: what a genius â to understand the risks so early and move entirely into cash before a 20â30% fall.
But then I realised something more important: he was never able to get back in. During the full-fledged bull market from March 2020 to 2024, he could not meaningfully participate despite one of the strongest rallies in Indian equities. The problem was not getting out. The problem was getting back in.
The real issue was that once he had mentally taken âthe other sideâ â whether that meant being in cash or wanting to go short â coming back fully and with conviction became extremely difficult.
My friend did not know how to short, but he knew perfectly well how to go long â through mutual funds and direct equities. He could have made enormous money simply by investing aggressively from March 2020 onward. But he could not.
Negativity tends to hit faster and deeper than positivity.
Even if he had managed to short, that trade would likely have worked for only a month or two. Going long, on the other hand, would have worked for the next three to five years.
He missed that entire bull phase because once the idea of âthe other sideâ took hold, it became very hard to shift back.
The danger of cash is not just that it may underperform. The bigger danger is that it can slowly become a mindset. Once that happens, getting back into equities always feels either too early or too late.
That is the real cash conundrum.
34 Likes
Lovely post Jaiprakash!
Our minds work in strange ways. Price anchoring is such a powerful bias - I have lost many opportunities because I âthoughtâ a stock was expensive at x, did not buy when it moved to 1.5x against my assessment, only to see it become 15x! Once your friend missed entering while NIFTY was at 8K, he would find it very difficult to enter 12K. I have realized the only way to take the gain is to endure the pain and what enables us to take pain is to have the ability to survive.
12 Likes
What a company âŚ
Youâve perfectly described Promoter A(ffu)CTION and his Rajaplace âinterest-free loanâ masterstroke 
Timbaktu⌠bahaha â every time they say âjust redesigning for 2.5x capacityâ, I hear âjust one more round of capex, bro, trust meâ.
I was the official boogeyman in this entire âselflessâ promoter journey, okay?
You nailed the investor mindset so hard â âmultibagger alert⌠salute to management⌠buying more!â
And the best part? You even exposed who actually got paid in advance⌠it wasnât the vendors,and rights issue at 50% discountâŚ.may be it was more then 50% ..okay !
My tuition fees were fair⌠but damn, small wouldâve been nicer. managed to do rights thing and cover just a little.
Next upturn Iâm just gonna re-read this thread before touching any âsemiconductor + import substitution + long runwayâ storyâŚespecially if its Promoter A(ffu)CTION type..okay !
2 Likes
Portfolio Update â May 2026 â random/forced exposure to evolve further, and being dumb
Most of my learning over the years came through blogs, videos and company filings. It comes mostly because I chose what I want to read or what algorithms threw at me. So, there was lack of randomness and forced exposure.
From last 1 year I have been attending monthly investors meet where few of VP members meet and discuss ideas. I am not interested in Ideas; I am interested in their process. Many of them come up with varied industry background and wide network. Fascinating to learn and connect the dots. This exposure allowed me to learn a bit about sectors I never looked at â Power, Data Centre etc.
Learning comes from willingness to accept new, expand horizon and embrace new areas even if there are traces of doubts. So, these meets opened me to areas of power and data centre related stuff. Luckily Jan to March dips were good enough for me to buy some of these at reasonable levels (CG Power, Aeroflex, E2E, KOEL, KSH International etc.). The point is if I was not exposed to right set of people I would not have read about these industries on my own as it was a mental block. Thanks to @hardik_shah1 for opening up my mind to these sectors. Thanks to @SHAIL_APTE who brings lot of industry insights and arranges these meets. Over and above, thanks to this platform.
Coming back: Itâs ok to take small steps before the big strides. In investing small steps are good enough though.
Just summarising for myself how I evolved (for my future reference) (Gemini created):
Equity allocation peaked at 85% - being dumb
I do not have any foresight; I donât have confidence hence I was dumb to ramp up my equity allocation to above 80% as my PF was showing some pain.
A tumultuous period where being dumb to increase equity allocation helped in hindsight. Equity allocation reached peak of ~85% in April, now down to 76% in May 2026. Still at highest ever range vs. last 3 years.
I would like to bring equity allocation down as I went bit too much aggressive in last 6 months.
Stocks
Portfolio remains more diversified than I want it to be with 35 positions. However, top 5 and top 10 positions are steady at 40% and 58% allocation.
Largest positions remains Nuvama and Acutaas. I built substantial positions in Shivalik and Sansera so they came to become top 5, the run up in prices also helped.
Some stock stories
Shivalik Bimetal and Sansera are based on expanding the capabilities to higher levels of growth and margins.
Shivalik Bimetal
I was invested in Shivalik in 2021, held it for 2-3 years. Recently I re-entered post its Q3FY26 commentary. The company is getting growth back in its base business (Shunts to US EV customer) and post tariffs they are focusing more on components and assemblies from strips business. Componens/assemeblies are higher margin and at 2-3x higher value. The clincher was its new products âbusbarâ for Automotives (initially EV late ICE too). This product alone could help grow its absolute revenue 80% in 3-years. While rest of the business could grow at 10-12%. This could double the revenues and more than double profits in 3-years.
I have shared Sansera rationale in my previous post.
I had written about these two companies on my LinkedIn page. I will post this content separately as link may not be allowed.
Breaking the mental block
As I removed my mental block on power/data centres, some defence, they became anchor of my portfolio performance in last quarter. These companies (KSH, E2E, Aeroflex, CG Power, Zen Technologies) went up in 30-100% range. Thereby my PF negated all the downside it could have seen due to external events.
Negatives
As I remove mental blocks, take small steps, portfolio becomes overdiversified. Also, I get a fleeting feeling with regards to many companies I hold. I have changed from strong conviction concentrated investor to fickle-minded overdiversified investor.
However, this has been problem from early 2024. High valuations do not allow me to take large conviction positions. Though I am complaining, outcome (returns) has been excellent so far.
Disclaimer: I am not a financial advisor and nor a SEBI registered Analyst. The content shared here is only for learning purpose. All the names mentioned here are for example purpose. I may buy more, exit or partly sell the stock/bonds without any prior intimation. I work for an investment advisory/PMS firm. My portfolio is not a recommendation for anyone. Some of these stocks might be in clients portfolio as well so please be aware of vested interest.
13 Likes
Mental model: Capabilities
Mental models explain how things work and are powerful tools in investing. One way to build them is by studying great businesses - their moats, revenue models, and evolution over time.
A company selling books online might seem like just a bookseller. However, its true capabilities are:
1. efficient inventory management,
2. lightning-fast delivery, and
3. an easy return policy
These capabilities can be used to sell anything online. So, you gain scale and thatâs how you get âAmazonâ.
We cover Appleâs case below to elaborate how capabilities helped it evolve over the years.
Apple
Capabilities driving âNiche to Globalâ transformation
Apple exemplifies how its core capability of design and tech helped it to evolve and create an ecosystem. Its customer base expanded from a niche segment of education sector and select creative professionals to global consumers. Today Apple is a universal aspirational brand.
Source: cbsnews.com and AI (gemini)
Mac computers accounted for 90% of Appleâs revenues until 2000, iPhone contributed about 50% in early part of 21st century. Quarter past 21st century, 2025, now it is a complete consumer device, entertainment and media ecosystem. As of today, its high-margin and high growth businesses - Services and Accessories, account for 50% of Appleâs profits. Services segment comprises App store, Apple Music/TV, Apple Pay, iCloud etc.
Appleâs customers and segment evolution
The core capabilities helped Apple expand its business from niche segment to become a global aspirational consumer brand. In early years, key customers were mainly affluent and high-income earning businesses and individuals in the US. In the recent years, it is not just an aspirational brand but a craze among Gen Z and Millennials across the globe. Affordability is no more a limitation, in India, a massive 70% of iPhone purchases are on EMIs.
Source: Korman capital and AI (Gemini)
The Indian context
It is critical to continuously refine our investment framework. We looked at an Indian auto ancillary business a year back, its key product, connecting rod, is used in ICE cars. A dying or low growth business, we assessed. However, companyâs stock did well to deliver ~30% returns within a year. We re-evaluated the company. We noted that it started reporting strong revenues from high margin Aerospace, Defence and Semiconductor (ADS) segment. ADS divisionâs revenues doubled within one year and it also launched few products in EV and tech-agnostic segment.
The issue in our investment thesis was our fixation on products, not capabilities - like forging various metals, casting, and precision molding/crafting. Viewing a company as a mere product maker limits you to narrow customer segments and sectors. Reframe this auto ancillary as a âprecision engineeringâ firm, and your thinking horizon expands dramatically. Opportunities then become visible across new sectors and customer segments.
Now having deeper understanding of this mental model, we are assessing few Indian businesses which are strong in capabilities and at the cusp of next big opportunity. One of the examples is a niche components company which is expanding its customer segments from consumer electronics (2005) to autos - both EV and ICE, smart meters, and now to data centers. Electron Beam Welding is the key capability of the company.
Disclaimer: I am not a financial advisor and nor a SEBI registered Analyst. The content shared here is only for learning purpose. All the names mentioned here are for example purpose. I may buy more, exit or partly sell the stock/bonds without any prior intimation. I work for an investment advisory/PMS firm. My portfolio is not a recommendation for anyone. Some of these stocks might be in clients portfolio as well so please be aware of vested interest.
7 Likes
if its ok, can u share why these businesses were a mental block? was it because of asset heavy nature, execution risks, dependency on government spendings, capex risks, previous infra cycle shadows or simething else?
why i ask is because i also have multiple mental blocks, have been working on some aspectsâŚ
This is an excellent point. This understanding comes when we see underlying companies with a vision shared with the promoters. If promoter is ethical & management top class, sooner or later business will evolve with its enviornment.
@Investor_No_1 I have been investing since 2010 and reading financial news from 2006. I have seen bad power cycle. Hype was similar to what we see now. My friends fell in love with this theme they invested in Ujaas, Suzlon (all time favorite), Tata power in those times. They never made money. So i have baggage of past.
Then off-course why I never invested - as you noted asset heavy nature, execution risks, dependency on government spendings, capex risks. In fact you talked about previous shadows (but on my friends).
Cost of being right: Also being vindicated for so many years - I was right, did not allow me to change side.
Now how did it change -
1. Someone (@hardik_shah1) talked about CG power with huge confidence - Some great said never underestimate a confident/overconfident person. I met Hardik sir over many meetings and could sense his good judgement. I was sold on the story but not on valuations - but thatâs where âtaking small steps in traces of doubtsâ came in picture.
Later when CG powerâs margin held up vs. many transformer guys saw decline, I could see an evidence it is in different league, I ramped up.
2. Margin of additional risk was low: Stock Prices were 25-50% down or valuations were cheap (KSH at <400 was 15pe on Fy27). I ramped up when in weak market it did not fall much (sign of strength). While CG power was down 25-30% from top and E2E was down 50% from peak so margin of additional risk was low.
3. Governance clearance - CG Power we know, in KSH Malabar was invested.
Disclaimer: I am not a financial advisor and nor a SEBI registered Analyst. The content shared here is only for learning purpose. All the names mentioned here are for example purpose. I may buy more, exit or partly sell the stock/bonds without any prior intimation. I work for an investment advisory/PMS firm. My portfolio is not a recommendation for anyone. Some of these stocks might be in clients portfolio as well so please be aware of vested interest.
4 Likes
bang on, the infra part of power was something many of that time tried to stay away from (including me) c g power demerged (or whatever) from CG and i was more interested in the consumer part of CGâŚ.last 2-4 years have been excellent for the infra part of such businessesâŚi happened to be a part of this rally unintentionally via one of my pick that i bought for superior tech and not for infraâŚ.so yes a mental block was/is there and for good reasonâŚ.though have had some learnings around b2b businesses, including theseâŚ.
btw valuations are indeed crazy so i consider my infra power stock as 1/3rd its value in my portfolio, if not lessâŚ.
Changing the lense
Recenly I was reveiwing an NBFC, grew its loan book 75% YoY in FY26, and Q1 FY27 loan book grew at 82%. However, just before Q1 FY27 update I changed my view on the company - on valuation angle.
Most of the times we just see what company is and what it can be in the next 2-3 years. In this case company guided for 25-30% loan growth in medium term. I look at that, i look at ROA/ROE and I thought it should trade in 3-4x price to book value.
However, I changed that view. The said NBFC released its AR just last month. The annual report outlined the ambitions - âLooking ahead, we are laying the foundation for future growth and diversification through the proposed establishment of subsidiaries in areas such as Asset Reconstruction Company (ARC), Alternative Investment Funds, Insurance Broking, and an AI-led tech platform. This reflects our forward-looking approach toward building a more comprehensive and resilient financial services platformâ. Source - https://www.bseindia.com/xml-data/corpfiling/AttachHis/931fe3c5-d70e-441a-8222-f9a1ee2ebdfb.pdf
What changed?
Now i dont see this NBFC as defined by numbers. I see it as defined by ambitions. I see it as a group (APL Apollo group) trying to becoming a giant. Financial Services is an ocean so its a right place to emerge as a giant. A place for next gen to prove.
Now i dont look at it as an NBFC to trade in 3-4 P/B band. I see it as where this family will be satisfied to see the company in 5-7 years. 1L crore loan book or 1L crore mcap? so my markers have changed.
Right way to think? - offcourse financial services is pretty bumpy place need to track the execution and capital allocation.
Disclaimer: bought today and holding it from last 3-4 months. This is shared just for educational purpose not an advise. I may exit at any point of time without updating here.
10 Likes
Journal - 9th July 2026.
Equity allocation - 80%+
I feel market is highly polarised. Some themes with fast growth and fast growth potential are trading at very high valuations (may be optically to my untrained eyes). Sectors - AI/DC and power proxies.
The rest of the market which is not hyped has modest or no growth but good established franchisees which are seemingly trading at low valuations (again may be optically). I put Banks, insurance, consumer etc in this category.
Then there is one area which is bit lost in this polarisation - recovery or steady performance lost in the noise of extreme plays. Thatâs what I am targeting right now. Good past couple of quarters or good commentary of near future.
Some examples:
- A watch company -
Whatâs working - sales growth of 25%+ for last 12/13 quarters.
Source: Screener.in
Stock Price: down ~20% from top in the last 18 months.
Challenges - margins are under pressure due to store expansion and rupee weakness.
Follow-up - One has to take call or track above two issues will they change in the next 2-3 years?
- A grader with 60%+ market share:
Whats working - The industry growth is very strong (15%+), company has strong revenue growth (20% average) in last 3 quarters and stable margins YoY.
Source: Screener.in
Stock Price: down ~40% from top in January 2025.
Challenges - Got bad name during IPO due to valuations and growth fell to single digit.
Follow-up**:** Growth issues seems to have gone away and management guidance (20% EBITDA growth) for FY27 is decent. Now we have to see if investors forget the bad experience of IPO. Growth has revived, do investors think that company has a defendable moat - crucial for re-rating to my expectations of 30PE. Stock is currently trading at 20x FY27 earnings.Now what PE shall we give to a company which is growing at 20%, ROE/ROCE of 40/50%, its B2B customers rave about it that its products are being graded by this company.
Disclaimer: I own both the companies, I am adding these on daily weekly basis. I am not a certified advisor. Please do your own due diligence. I could exit these or add more without any prior intimation.
5 Likes
Is company no 2 in financial services, consumer,Healthcare or industrial??
Markets can stay irrational for a long time - But we as investors try to find opportunities and stay rational and accumulate steady and high margins and high return ratio businesses and stay long.
The second company is IGIL.
2 Likes
Note to self:
2point2 letter reminded me of missing Tata Elxsi and LTTS. I made 20% and got out. After that both stocks went up 10-15x. I could not have rode it as I never understood business but when stocks run up 20% in short-time - I should go and try to understand the business or at least see what management has to say on future.
Some excerpts from note for future reference:
âIf a position was sold and the stock subsequently rose, the eager learner concludes âI sell too earlyâ and adjusts their behavior, perhaps holding longer next time, even when the next position genuinely should have been sold. If a position was sold and the stock subsequently fell, the eager learner concludes âmy instinct was rightâ and grows more confident in a decision-making process that may have had little to do with the actual outcome. Both conclusions turn a single datapoint, contaminated by market noise and mental bias, into a flawed rule.â
9 Likes
Skepticism at the core of managing outcomes
Terry smith, Age 70+, estimated research+fund management experience of 40+ years. He is called as English Warren Buffet. He is pivoting (at least some portion) to momentum from value investing. I have been following him for past few years, loved his thought process. It breaks my heart that he is pivoting due to under-performance.
One of the investing folly is holding onto one type of style, not evolving. Its not about jumping around and buying and selling in short term or targeting high churn. Its rather a subtle understanding of the world - where itâs heading. If cant predict then at least react. I mostly react.
Lets take example of Brands as moat: Traditional investing has given lot of importance to Brands - the brands have been able to garner pricing over the years due to ambition and social status. The demand for brand has only increased however number of brands have gone up multi-fold. Brands were traditionally built with top down funnel (TV advertising) however this has changed to influencer advertising recently, hence brands could be for niche, and there could be multiple brands for same. Hence, playing investing on these brands for multi-year basis could be difficult as creating brand is somwehat easy and also size of opportunity does not allow it to become investing theme for long.
My investment journey has been full of skepticism, that has resulted in experimenting/evolving time to time over the years.
I have seen many investors are able to take stock specific anti-thesis. However, I have never been able to do that. I can only have thesis on a stock which I want to buy. Only anti-thesis is - decline in stock price.
Nevertheless, I am overall skeptic on my investing process and style.
Post my initial stupidity of investing/trading in 2010-2012. In 2013/14 hearing from Warren Buffet influenced Ramdeo ji I thought having a own investment process is answer to a sustainable long-term investing journey. I somehow got my own investment process - be in circle of competence and be in structural trends.
In 2020 having reached a monetary milestone I decided to change my investing style to go out of my circle of competence (mainly BFSI) and bluechips to small caps.
It was like creating my own Chaos monkey.
Netflix: âWe have created Chaos Monkey, a program that randomly chooses a server and disables it during its usual hours of activity. Some will find that crazy, but we could not depend on the random occurrence of an event to test our behavior in the face of the very consequences of this event.â
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_engineering:
Then came 2024, where core - valuations - was insane. Nothing seem to be available at reasonable price. For me the whole thing boiled down to 1 thing - donât lose more than 20% of portfolio. This made me look for trading, which incorporated stop losses thereby ensuring I donât lose more than 20%.
However, I did not trade for more than 6 months as I did not want my mindset change a lot from what I have learnt over the years. I reduced my equity allocation to almost 50% to avoid losses.
I remained a confused investor mostly from 2024 to 2025. Luckily 2026 allowed me to increase equity allocation to 80%+ as valuations cooled off.
The very new I have started doing is couple of case studies i shared above. Lets see how that evolves.
7 Likes
If AI makes innovation cheaper and faster, what happens to valuation multiples?
One of the topics in our recent investors meeting at Ahmedabad was around AIâs impact on Indian CDMO companies.
The bullish argument was straightforward. AI is making clinical research faster and more efficient. If drug discovery becomes faster, more molecules should enter clinical trials and eventually reach the market. More molecules should translate into more manufacturing opportunities for Indian CDMOs. Sounds like a structural tailwind.
But I had a slightly different view. A significant part of the premium I assign to businesses comes from them being differentâ built on superior technology, IP or an innovation advantage. That is why I am comfortable paying 40-60x PE for some companies.
But what if AI reduces the scarcity of innovation and shortens shelf-life of end-products?
If idea generation and discovery become cheaper and faster, more companies can innovate. Reverse engineering becomes easier. Product cycles could become shorter.
If that happens, should businesses continue to command the same premium multiples? Or do todayâs 40-60x PE businesses slowly become 15-25x PE businesses?
A pharma example to illustrate the thought: An innovator launches a differentiated drug and an Indian CDMO invests in manufacturing capacity. Traditionally, the commercial and patented life of the molecule may have been 7-9 years, giving both the parties enough time to earn attractive returns.
Now imagine owing to cumulative data and previous study advantage - AI enables the innovator to discover a significantly better molecule within 2-3 years.
The innovator faces cannibalization. The CDMO may have to recover its investment over a much shorter period. If manufacturing assets arenât sufficiently fungible, ROCEs could come under pressure.
The pharma example is just an illustration.
The broader question Iâm thinking about is this: Markets donât reward just innovation. They reward scarce innovation and its longevity.
If AI changes what is scarce, shouldnât valuation frameworks evolve as well?
Lets ask a modified question now: Which part of the value chain becomes commoditized, and where does the new moat emerge?
In my pharma example may be opportunity is at CRO firms but India does not have much of pure play CRO listed companies. As drug discovery happens faster, does it help the tech players who enable commercialization (Sales & marketing), technology supporting regulatory workflows?
I am trying to figure out.
13 Likes
Disclaimer: A 50-60% decline in my equity portfolio would not materially affect my standard of living. It might affect yours.
How about every investor or financial influencer discussing their portfolio or advising on TV or social media provides this disclaimer
âIâm 100% invested in equities.â âI have deployed all the cashâ.
I often hear this from renowned investment managers/gurus and financial influencers.
What comes to your mind when you hear this? âHe must be an exceptional investor.â âHe has immense conviction.â
For a long time, I found these statements inspiring. I thought being fully invested was a sign of conviction.
Then I realized something important:
Investing is personal. My income, wealth, financial responsibilities, and risk tolerance are different from theirs.
Many of the people making these statements are founders, fund managers, or successful business owners. They have multiple income streamsâsalary, performance fees, dividends, carried interest, or business income. Many financial influencers also earn through advertising, research subscriptions, training programs, newsletters, and speaking engagements.
A 50â60% drawdown may hurt their portfolio. It may not hurt their lifestyle.
For many individual investors, thatâs simply not the case.
Sometimes I wish every investor or financial influencer discussing their portfolio or advising on TV or social media should include this disclaimer: âA 50-60% decline in my equity portfolio would not materially affect my standard of living. It might affect yours ."
What is prudent for someone with multiple income streams can be reckless for someone whose portfolio is their primary source of wealth.
Before you copy anyoneâs allocation, ask yourself one question: could you provide the same disclaimer, and mean it?
Donât just copy portfolios, copy context.
What do you think of the disclaimer by the way?
23 Likes
Good post @joinjp2003 . I never believed in 100% equities. Earlier i traded in equities for short money for travel, consumption. It became a serious affair in 2013 after i saw some my earlier traded stocks rose 50X. Made good chunk in 2014-2017 rally, liquidated 40% of PF and cleared real estate loans. 2018-2020 lost 80% of remaining. 2020 till 2024 made again a fabulous return, started losing in 2025 and got a sense that markets may remain range bound for long term, how ever portfolio growth was 50X, started buying rental assets in hills, moved some capital there which has grown 100% and compensated for drop in networth due to equities. Even today i am not fully convinced on broader market for a bull run and nothing is still cheap which is still good and whatever is cheap has some hidden jargaons, have started moving some capital to a plot investment, will move out 10% in two years. Current networth has shifted a bit towards real estate assets where two are generating cash. Stocks in indian markets are behaving like US equities, 10 years future earnings are discounted in todays price and stock become worst investment if you hold or buy. Return in stock markets on index level will be lumpy for times to come. 100% equity is never cup of my tea and only other class which can beat is land investment. Even even stock PF drops by 50% real estate is a safest cushion and will remain in times to come. Non believer in bank FDâs as of now.
8 Likes