Mann's Portfolio

Hello VP members,
Have not updated PF in a while here,
Hence updating it after almost 5 months.
2 out of top 3 position still remains same

  1. SKP Bearings
  2. Creative Newtech
  3. Kontor Spaces
  4. AVG Logistics
  5. Mold - Tek Technology
  6. Galaxy bearings
  7. Misc. (10% - 5 stocks)

Added Kontor due to Co-working tailwinds → Check the write up of mine in on VP

AVG Logistics → they are trying to be the first asset light logistics company, they are doing work in cold chain logistics in Nagpur and Odisha, there’s some major subsidy for set up and post that there’s high margin (28%) for the business,
if they scale up quickly like they are promising they must be trading at 1.25x PEG

Let me know views if any

Bit curious on the SKP bearing holding. If I’m not wrong the capex will go live in FY26, right? How are you so comfortable holding this in this market where there are plethora of opportunities

Disc: Not tracking SKP , not invested

1 Like

Hello ,
As you have written that AVG logistics is trying to be the first in the cold chain logistic. Actually there is a company name Snowman Logistics who is working on it and has got quite a market share.

I’ll suggest you to read carefully before commenting,
I said first co. Trying to be asset light not first in cold chain logistics,
Also they might be the first co. in 3PL in cold chain

Happy to dicuss further in DM

Capex has already gone live,
And even if it were supposed to go in FY 26,
Why so much near sightseeing?

If i wanted to hamper around I could have been trading,

Most of my past bets were also from a view of 3+ years some of them rewarded very quickly,

Had to churn some due to other opportunity,

I’ll suggest talking with SKP sir and doing other scuttlebut,

The corporate governence and management quality is top notch,

Bearings in itself is turning around,

I’ll be happy to hold when there’s extreme euphoria around anyways😅

It’s just my thought process can be wrong though.

1 Like

Ops my bad . Yes for sure would love to discuss :grinning:

Creative newtech is an interesting bet however what do you think about its poor OCF

Its growing very fast, and the business is essential a distributor, so optimizing working capital is key here, in order to grow this fast, more cash is going in then coming out.

True but then won’t it require constantly new funding which might lead to higher debt / equity raise whilst also paying high interest costs. I like the business especially the upcoming Honeywell partnership but this is the only thing holding me back

Well, licensing business will have better CF.

Hi, Have you exited Crown Lifters? Any specific reason for doing so? Thanks.

Hey!
Yaa exited long time ago if you follow me on twitter you probably know the reason

Tarachand was interesting bet for me at 200 odd ruppees and was valued faar cheap in comparison to Crown,

No reason other than valuation run up actually to sell,

Value here was in sub 90s but not in 300s

I exited around 200-210 so it made me look fool there too but tarachand compensated enough for me

Disclaimer: Not a buy sell reco
I own neither of above atm

2 Likes

Hi,
SKP bearing situation looks intresting, promoter has bought nearly 1% in last 3 months, stock is available at 210, what’s your call, are you averaging up?

Hey are you still holding dp wires? have a few doubts…though it looks like a value pick…

Haven’t been active on this thread since I joined a family office as an analyst, and due to some regulatory or disclosure requirements, I have tried posting less just to be on the safer side.

But this post is less from the perspective of stocks and more about the change in portfolio construction as a whole.

Over the last four months of the bull market (October to January), the IRR for my portfolio jumped through the roof as some of the concentrated bets resulted in my portfolio almost 2.5x-ing in four months (heights of craze, I guess). But now, I’m trying to come back to my old roots. What do I mean by that? I’ll explain in the next write-up.

I have always been an old follower of Utpal Sheth sir and have felt that the depth of his work and knowledge is not something that can be grasped in one go.

I started thinking about the framework of Terminal Value Investing + Adaptable Challengers.

So what do I mean by that?

A company with a business model that is inherently so different that it is very, very hard to replicate, even if you give away all its secrets and business takeaways.

If anybody had done the modeling of such businesses, they would have known that the less capital-intensive the back end of a business is, the higher its terminal value will be. That made me lean toward businesses with lower capital intensity as they scale, leading to unbeatable cumulative value creation. With less capital reinvested and idle cash flows accumulated, shareholder value keeps compounding.

And what does Adaptable Challengers mean? These businesses aren’t market leaders, but they have the agility to shift with trends, giving them a first-mover advantage.

But isn’t this what everybody is looking for? Quite possibly, yes.

So what makes you different from most other investors? Differentiated insights about the business. (Again, borrowing the wording from Utpal sir.)

What is the unique insight you have that makes you stick with a business?

For every buyer (you), there are multiple sellers—that’s how the market works. But what’s the insight that gives you the conviction to stand against the tide without flinching?

Quite honestly, this is where the alpha lies.

As Jeff Bezos says, “Your margin is my business opportunity.” I’d say, “Your disbelief or counter-thesis is my alpha.” The stronger the market’s skepticism, the higher the alpha potential.

Portfolio Construction Based on This Thought Process

Let’s dive into some of the thought processes behind my portfolio construction, based on all three learnings: Terminal Value Investing + Adaptable Challengers + Differentiated Insights.

I have always been very intrigued by platform businesses (I own four in my portfolio and am planning to add a fifth). The dynamics of these businesses are different from traditional ones. Unlike manufacturing businesses, where demand is forecasted and supply is developed accordingly, platform businesses develop the supply side first.

For example, take Amazon.

If you were building an e-commerce giant in 1995 amid the tech boom, could you have predicted the total addressable market (TAM) that Amazon has today? Especially considering how much of it comes from AWS rather than e-commerce? Not really.

Even within e-commerce, Amazon started with books—not with a full-fledged product portfolio. Over time, it scaled up to more than 100K SKUs.

One major takeaway from studying such businesses: Supply-side strength is the moat for platform businesses. Building a strong portfolio of supply early on allows these businesses to achieve high Lifetime Value (LTV) to Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) ratios.

For example, if a business acquires a customer for one service, but over five years sells them five different services, the customer’s lifetime value increases dramatically.

Hence, before onboarding customers, it’s crucial to build the supply side first. Early monetization of some part of this supply can also help cushion cash burn while developing other services.

Again, look at Amazon. While developing its e-commerce platform, it started with books—not a full-fledged product range. Slow monetization of this single category helped reduce cash burn for expanding into other services.

Financially, what makes platform businesses unique?

Most of their costs are fixed—employees, software development, UX/UI, data collection, data interpretation & monetization, and the cost of developing new offerings.

Because a large portion of costs are fixed, scaling becomes highly profitable over time. This aligns with the concept of high terminal value investing—low capital intensity leading to long-term scalability.

Adaptable Challengers: Agility in Market Cycles

This is more of a bottom-up approach, analyzing how a company adapts to changing cycles.

Some companies are able to pivot and capture new opportunities faster than others, giving them a significant edge. These companies don’t necessarily dominate their industry but thrive in shifting environments.

I’ve made such companies a big part of my portfolio—around 35-40% across four ideas—because they fit this framework perfectly.

Independent Theme: Recycling – A High Terminal Value Play for the Next 5-7 Years

Beyond platform businesses, I believe recycling is a long-term theme with strong potential.

Most recycling businesses are highly capital-intensive, with payback periods of 5-6 years and ROICs of 15-17%. That’s good—but not compelling enough for a high-quality framework.

I wasn’t willing to compromise on my framework until I found a company that fit perfectly.

This company has:

  • A 3-4 year payback period instead of 5-6 years.
  • A much lower capital requirement compared to competitors.
  • A superior ROIC of 22-25% (not as high as platform businesses, but still great).

The competitive advantage? Its technology is developed by its parent firm and provided at cost.

Why This Got Me Excited

This company is in tyre recycling.

After evaluating multiple recycling sub-sectors, I found that only tyre recycling is economically viable, while many other recycling processes struggle because the price of recycled material is lower than virgin material.

India is full of batch pyrolysis tyre recycling plants, especially in the north. But batch pyrolysis is highly polluting. Continuous pyrolysis, on the other hand, is far more efficient and sustainable.

The Pollution Control Board (PCB) is now cracking down on batch pyrolysis plants, and I believe continuous pyrolysis will dominate going forward.

This company is ahead of the curve, positioning itself as a future leader in the space.

Portfolio Allocation

Though this is a recent buy, I’ve made a 9% allocation in my portfolio, believing that its current top line could become its bottom line in five years—a massive value creation opportunity.

Another Opprtunity here are Theme parks made with recycled materials with the Infinite ROCE and ROE and PBP from the 1st day in terms of capital and in terms of WC in 5-6 months (Still crazy and has the opportunity to do excute the same outside of India + multiple aveneus in terms of the Cross seling If the same materializes the TV can be at very end of the spectrum

Conclusion: Investing with a Long-Term, High-Terminal-Value Mindset

To sum it up, my focus is on:

  1. High Terminal Value – Businesses that scale with minimal reinvestment.
  2. Agility & Adaptability – Companies that can pivot quickly.
  3. Differentiated Insights – Finding overlooked opportunities where the market is wrong.

I am not chasing front-end returns but building a resilient, scalable, and high-quality portfolio that can generate sustainable wealth over time.

Final PF allocation:

Will try to move the allocations in the companies fitting the framework

Nothing discussed above is recomendation above note is just for my future references

11 Likes

Did some research on continuous pyrolysis and seems like it’s a tough nut to crack with its own operational difficulties, but GRP is coming up with a much larger continuous pyrolysis capacity compared to the company i think you are talking about ? GRP also has strong relationships with large tyre manfs, do you think GRP is much better placed to capture incremental demand or the market is going to v large that everyone can survive ?

Im not talking about GRP

GRP has ridiculously high Capex

GRP has 150 cr CAPEX but for the subject co. Capex is 50 crores

You couldnt be more far off :sweat_smile:

No Ashar i know which company you are talking about, chalo indirectly boldeta hu hi red oxygen :joy: what i was asking is GRP is also coming up with a large continuous pyrolysis plant - and GRP also has long term partnerships with large tyre manfs.. question was do you think hi red oxygen can capture incremental demand (continuous pyrolysis being a differentiating factor and closure of batch pyrolysis production) or GRP being the larger player pose a competition to hi red oxygen (last time code language use karraha bas :joy:) or is the opp size too high that everyone survives

3 Likes

GRP’s plant is equivalent to the plant of our subject company with the Capex cost of 2.5x to 3x
the financial modeling goes out of the toss for GRP as return ratios are depressed as hell with that Cost as IRR goes for toss

Also don’t think that tie up matters to much as there are mutliple batch pyrolysis plants in India that CPCB is cracking down on check the following for the issues that are being faced by Batch recycling + sourcing ease

That being said I have just initated the position now
Will size it bigger with the time

5 Likes

Sorry- is there a reason why you cant share the company name. Is it to do with your role in the family office?