Apologies for very long post
Hi
Over the past 2-3 days did extensive reading on Kaveri
Seeds. My view is that apart from management execution skill there are certain
other factors like steep increase in cotton prices, drastic increase in area
under BT cotton which helped Kaveri to post fantastic growth in the past. Now
these factors can help them to post another good growth in FY13 but FY14 growth
is definitely at risk unless and until they can scale up the sale of other seed varieties like Rice or
Brinjal etc. Going by history of BT
cotton approval hiccups in the past, it may not be smooth ride for company. Please
find below my analysis in detail:
Risk
Need to check
sustainability of growth going forward: I think following factors lead to drastic
increase in sales of BT cotton in the past and these benefits may or may not be
available to Kaveri seeds for its other varieties.
1)
Over the
last five years BT cotton has contributed to about 60% of the absolute growth
in sales and I suspect a majority of it is driven by increase in selling price.
Now I do not have the sales quantity of BT cotton separately. What I have done
is to take the consumption (shown as issues in notes to account) of finished
seeds for FY07-11. Now it is possible that these quantities include damage
seeds, seeds issued as samples. But I think broadly it gives a ball park number
which should be fine. Below table shows
that between FY 2007-11, volumes increased only by 10% CAGR, so rest of the
sales growth must be from price increase. But we can check further with the
company on the volume growth in BT cotton seeds over the last five years.
Another thing which puzzles me is that despite government control, how it was
possible for Kaveri seeds to increase prices so drastically. So it is possible that I am missing some link
somewhere.
|
10-12
|
07-12
|
Sales value CAGR
|
|
|
BT cotton
|
114%
|
95%
|
Others
|
24%
|
26%
|
BT Cotton contribution to overall growth (Not CAGR, but absolute
contribution)
|
69%
|
59%
|
|
|
|
|
07-11
|
FY12
|
Total seeds sales
|
37%
|
64%
|
Sales quantity CAGR
|
10%
|
14%
|
Note: Share of BT
cotton in total sales have increased from 10% in 2007 to 25% in 2010 to 50% in
2012 (Source 2007 & 2010 broker report).
2)
Drastic increases
in cotton prices (CAGR of more than 50% between CY 2008-11, though cotton
prices had softened in 2012, put another way cotton prices of last three year
average 2009-2012 (YTD) is 70-80% higher than 2000-09 average. These cotton
prices are international prices IN USD, so there can be 10% +/- difference for
India) have lead to additional area under cotton ((9% CAGR between FY 2008-11).
It is quite possible that due to drastic increase in cotton prices, there was a
mad rush by farmers to increase area under cotton which provided boost both to
the volumes and selling price.
Area under cotton, production and yield
|
|
|
|
|
Area
|
Production
|
Yield
|
|
Cotton prices
|
FY
|
CAGR
|
CAGR
|
CAGR
|
|
Calendar. Y
|
CAGR
|
1950-2002
|
0.8%
|
3.1%
|
2.3%
|
|
1975-2011
|
2.9%
|
2002-07
|
4.5%
|
19.8%
|
14.6%
|
|
2001-2006
|
4.1%
|
2005-09
|
1.7%
|
4.5%
|
2.8%
|
|
2004-08
|
3.9%
|
2007-12
|
5.9%
|
4.3%
|
-1.6%
|
|
2006-11
|
21.6%
|
2007-10
|
4.1%
|
2.9%
|
-1.2%
|
|
2006-09
|
2.3%
|
2009-12
|
9.0%
|
6.0%
|
-2.8%
|
|
2008-11
|
57.5%
|
3)
Area under BT cotton has increased from 40% in FY 2006-07 to about 90% by
2011-12 http://indiagminfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Bt-Cotton-False-Hype-and-Failed-Promises-Final.pdf.
Now whether the same can happen for other crops, may or may not be.
I do not think entire
income can be treated as agriculture income under Income tax: I think
Kaveri seeds entire income may not fall clearly under agricultural exemption. Letâs
try and compare seed company income with the tea company. Not entire income of a tea manufacturer will fall under
agricultural income. Only that part of income which directly relates to growing
tea leaves is exempted but any part of income which relates to further
processing of tea leaves into tea is not exempted. For this purpose, IT rules
specify certain % of income which will be deemed to be agricultural income.
Though for seeds company no such rules are there, but I think even they will be
entitled to get exemption for only that part of income which relates to sowing
of seeds and any income which relates to further processing of seeds in the
plant is not exempted (Here I am presuming that Kaveri needs to further process
the seeds it receives from farmers). See this link for cases pertaining to tea
companies. http://law.incometaxindia.gov.in/DitTaxmann/IncomeTaxActs/2001ITAct/rules2001/mg029.htm.
Also came across some case law which states that income of
seed companies are not agriculture income. Not sure if this case law overruled
by any subsequent judgement. http://taxguru.in/income-tax-case-laws/income-from-cultivation-of-parent-hybrid-seed-is-non-agricultural-income-and-taxable-as-business-income.html
Further Questions
for management (in addition to volume and ASP details highlighted above for BT
cotton)
Sales schemes
expenses have increased from 9.3% of sales in 2008 to 17.5% of sales by 2012.
Sales scheme expenses are in addition to advertisement and sales promotion. On
the contrary, sales promotion expenses have declined from 5.8% of sales in 2008
to 3.5% of sales in 2012. We need to have clarity on what exactly all these
expense are and how they are related to sales and moreover, reason for such a
drastic increase in sales scheme expenses.
Irrespective of the accounting treatment, if these are discounts or seed
packets distributed free to distributors on achievement of some sales target
rather than free samples to farmers than for our purpose, we should deduct
these directly from sales.
More clarity on
advance can help us to forecast the sales for next year better: Company
make half-yearly disclosure of its balance sheet items sometime in Oct. So by
looking at current liabilities (which comprise) mostly customer advances, we
can forecast sales for next year. To do
this better we need to understand customer advances in detail. A) What is the %
of advance which customers need to pay at the time of order booking and by what
time advance should be paid for availing delivery in the June quarter B) Is the advance payment depends on the credit
profile of customers or all customers mandatorily have to pay in advance.
C) Is the advance only for BT cotton or
for all seeds.
Some minor issues,
which gives some clue about the management quality and quality of auditor:
â
Investments
in shares and equity mutual funds, a small irritant: Company has invested around INR 15 crs in equity mutual
fund indicating that it does not need that fund for next 3-5 years. Then why not to increase dividends. Moreover,
company had made provision for diminution in value of investment of INR 3.5
crores which I presume is because of equity mutual funds. Similarly there are
investments of INR 2 crs in equity and the company has already made provision
for diminution of value of equity by INR 1.5 crs. I
think it gives some clues for future capital allocation.
â
Both bad
debts and provision for doubtful debts are increasing over the years. From
very nominal amount in 2010, they increased to 0.8 cr in 2011 and to INR 2.4
crs in 2012. Now going by history till date they have incurred around 2 Crs of
bad debts, but this certainly points out that their accounting is not on the
conservative side. Still they have INR 10 crs of receivables more than six
months for which no provision is made.
â
In 2011
when it was mandatory, they failed to disclose sales quantity. Secondly for
2010 and 2011 auditor failed to ensure disclosure of segmental details though
mentioned that they have two segments (strangely upto 2009 they have disclosed
segmental details). Further many details like disclosure of loan repayment,
interest rate, etc which are required by revised Schedule VI are not disclosed.
Now when the auditor fails to comply with basic minimum disclosure requirement,
how much can we trust him to ensure that all liabilities and assets (more so
cash) is stated accurately on balance sheet.
â
Royalty
as a % of sales increased from 3% of sales in 2008 to 10% of sales in 2011 and
stayed at 10% for 2012. Need to understand what % of sales are payable as
royalty and the reason for increase in royalty over the years. As per some
articles in the newspaper I understand that Monsanto took the state government to court
over increasing royalty.
â
Need to
understand why the short term loan of INR 19 crs not yet repaid despite surplus
cash
Some points needs
to be double check in stock story
â
In the stock story section it was mentioned â
Rapid market share growth, to 11% in
FY12 from 5.5% a year back on the back of its differentiated BT Cotton Hybrid.â
But according to annual report volume growth is just 14.4%. I doubt that market
share can double merely on increase of around 14% volumes. Now what is possible
that though overall volumes are less, volumes for BT cotton are quite high.
Phew .... I am done for now