Dear All,
Today I was having a discussion with few good investors (who are already on VP). The topic was:
)- When speaking about Capital Allocation, do we also need to check Sector Allocation ?
Here I am talking not about stock picking but talking about risk management
For simplicity I am assuming a 10 Stock Portfolio with 10% alocation to each stock and for
Say, I have 4 Pharma Stocks in my portfolio (i.e. 40% of my portfolio in Pharma Sector) and then I find a great company with excellent fundamentals (within Pharma again) and decide to allocate 10% money to it.
What is the Problem ?
1). Post this investment I will have 50% in Pharma Sector alone, so should I continue with this, irrespective of anything (because I focus on stocks and not on sectors)
2). Should I sell an existing **good **Pharma stock (which I feel has run its full course) to allocate money to the new stock.
3). In case of a sudden Government intervention (like it happened in Gold Industry), my portfolio might take a good beating, if it was heavy of one sector alone.
4). Though I have managed to diversify the companies in my portfolio, I have not diversified the Industry risk.
Question is, should I let go of a good stock, or re-allocate money within existing stocks.Obviously the risk always remain, but by diversifying industries/sectors, I am trying to manage my allocation to a particular sector and trying to save my self from a Black Swan event.
Why it is not a problem
1). My core competency is Technology/Pharma. I know in and out of the sector and I can manage a high sector allocation (Extremely Valid Point)
2). I focus on picking good stocks and it does not matter to me if they are all from same industry.(Valid Point)
3). I have made a lot of money on this sector, and currently the market is upbeat on IT and Pharma, and they are the market leaders, so I will continue with my existing strategy (Not a sensible****argument in my opinion)
May be seniors like Donald, Ayush and Hitesh Bhai can guide on this.