Accent Microcell Limited - A Niche Microcap with some puddles

Incorporated in Ahmedabad on April 10, 2012 Accent microcell limited is into manufacturing of a excipient named MCC à Microcrystalline cellulose

It’s one of the most used excipient in pharma value chain. MCC market is valued at $411 Million (around 2800 Crores) and is projected to reach $712.9 Million

Source – RHP

Process of manufacturing – Cellulose obtained from Wood pulp is mixed with Hydrochloric acid and mix it up and heated @105C for 15 minutes

The cellulose obtained is known as depolymerized cellulose and this Depolymerized Cellulose is Known As MCC

Value chain given in RHP


image

Where is MCC used in ? → in wide range of application such as pharma, textile, packaged food for anti-caking, etc. for Accent max contribution arises on account of Pharmaceutical business → 72%

If you have followed my Yasho thread (the co. has very minute division of B2C where co. manufactures the Anti-oxidant, for formulation of such anti oxidants carrier or filler is required à carrier – Helps API to reach to target site in formulation and Filler à helps in bulking the weight

Some of the competitor are

Dupont de Nemours, Inc.

Asahi Kasei Corporation

Sigachi Industries Limited

Accent Microcell Pvt. Ltd. (red flag)

DFE Pharma GmbH & Co.KG

Since the MCC market is very very tiny 2800 crores globally the exports are to facilitated in order to Ensure revenue growth → Domestic market will be sub 700 crores at max.

The major grades of MCC manufactured and marketed by Company are branded under the name “accel”. Besides “accel” they sell products under the name “acrocell”, “maccel” and “Vincel”.

The company has 2 manufacturing unit → @ Dahej and Pirana à both are running at optimum capacity @100% and 95% respectively

The company IPOed recently and there was no OFS the whole issue was Fresh infusion

Purpose of the IPO was to Install the capacity for Croscarmellose Sodium (“CCS”), Sodium Starch Glycolate and Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)

For the amount of 54.39 crores the commercial production for which will start from March 2025

Croscarmellose sodium is a super-disintegrant, which means it helps tablets break down quickly and completely when they come into contact with moisture in the gastrointestinal tract. This property is useful for improving the dissolution and absorption of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) in tablets or capsules.

Hence for pharma co. both are a need however they don’t complement each other’s value chain hence we can safely say they are venturing in horizontal integration (expansion)

Now why does Croscarmellose Sodium (“CCS”) Excite me – See below SS


image

The CCS margins are more than 30% although the capacity for Accent is around 2400 out of 10,400 MT capacity but a start is a start

Market for CCS is almost 850 Million double of MCC market

The EBITDA margins for the company can be sub 24% once the capacity comes live

Considering that 70% of revenue is on account of pharma it’s not surprising that Gujarat is the major contributor of their revenue and for export it’s Brazil. Their MCC market and CCS market is Big

4 members of family are paid cross of 30 Lakhs which frankly is very nominal considering that annualised pat as per Sept result can be 28 crores

Certain Redflags:-

The IPO proceeds will be used in manufacturing the capacity – the land for which is procured from the Related party at 0.6 crores à possibility of Mark up pricing

“Independent contractors” from which the whole expansion project is to be facilitated are “Patels” only à the chances of being related party not recognised by the law is high though no proof

Source – RHP

The promoter is into the same business through Unlisted entity Accent Microcell Pvt. Ltd. (red flag) which is mentioned as competitor for MCC in RHP à what’s the need for the same?

Land In Dahej SEZ is on lease (ofc) risk of non renewal
The company is owned by Patel family  average cost of acquisition is around 10 Rupees  Source – RHP
Issued on preference basis to family members @50 Just before the IPO on August 2023
Disclaimer - Not invested

3 Likes

The promoter is into the same business through Unlisted entity Accent Microcell Pvt. Ltd. (red flag) which is mentioned as competitor for MCC in RHP à what’s the need for the same?

Accent Microcell Pvt. Ltd seems to be a former name of this same public listed entity. After reading your analysis, I found it to be a major red flag so I tried to dig into their website for any info on this, in the career section of the website “Career – Accent Microcell Ltd.”, I found in the contact info - “(Formerly Known as Accent Microcell Pvt. Ltd.)” . So the report which you referred from while listing competitors may have made the mistake of referring some old database and hence listed it as a competitor (at-least that’s what I am thinking).

image

Disc : Taken some initial positions



I think there was some mix up from my end, Sorry for that.
But the company’s group company are into formulation and also into API
For excipient one has to make sure that promoter since has technical knowledge will not share the same with it’s other group companies.
Which in turn is very difficult since it’s person and not the machine.
I’ll be seeing the development here → business is good but IPO funds utilization through Patel family might be a risk and sharing technical knowledge such that the Formulation company itself enters into horizontal expansion is Risk → Personal Opinion is that I don’t see enough Risk premium to bear the risk at this price
But will surely look at appropriate level for the same :smiley:

I am sorry but are you suggesting that promoters of Accent Microcell will tell their sister formulation companies how to make excipients in-house and destroy their own business, after building the excipient business after a decade of effort? Whats the basis for such a ludicrous comment?

I am sharing my notes of my work on Accent Microcell. What I found really interesting in the company was consistent cashflow generation, despite making low margins and operating at a small scale. They have done small capexes regularly using these cashflows. Even during COVID, they didn’t take any loan moratorium because cashflow generation was quite decent (see table below). Also, their sales have become 3.4x from FY16-FY24 and profits have grown from 0.84 cr. to 37 cr.! This is particularly impressive as their first plant in Pirana was only established in 2012 (its only a 12-year old company).

Year Sales PBILDT PAT Operating cycle Export % CFO / accruals
FY16 72.18 7.34 0.84 4.25
FY17 74.47 7.87 0.83 52 days 60% 4.31
FY18 97.88 10.31 1.84 46 days 50% 5.14
FY19 119.51 11.14 3.62 50 days 59% 8.84
FY20 135.25 12.62 4.18 54 days 61% 7.79
FY21 139.68 13.97 6.21 64 days 64% 7.32
FY22 173.33 16.79 8.22 62 days 66.8% 14.91
FY23 202.95 18.94 12.24 68 days 63.54% 5.62

Post IPO, their operating cycle has expanded from 50 to 70 days because their payables have reduced drastically. I think they have reduced creditor cycle for availing cash discounts, which is now resulting in higher gross margins.

We see this clearly in the large reduction in payables from 35 cr. in FY23 to 13 cr. in H1FY25.

During this period, gross margins improved from 32% in FY22 to 41% in FY24 (46% in H1FY24, 36.5% in H2FY24, 38% in H1FY25). The 6-8% improvement in gross margins is either because of lower raw material prices or due to lower creditor cycle (or a combination). The recent care rating report mentions that their margin improvement was due to moderation in wood pulp and coal prices along with benefit from economies of scale. It needs to be seen if their gross margins sustain at 40%+. This is especially important given Sigachi makes gross margins of 50% consistently (see comparison below).

If anyone can shed further insights into the differences in end-markets of Accent vs Sigachi which might be resulting in the gross margin differential, it will be very useful.

Disclosure: Not invested (no transactions in last-30 days)

7 Likes

The company IPO in Dec 23. I wonder why they did not operated with Crisil? Is there anything to worry about?

1 Like

Hi,
I am trying to understand one simple calculation for this company.

In FY24, they did sales of ~240 crs and produced ~8000 tons which converts into ~INR 300 per KG realization. 92% of sales came from MCC and rest 8% from other products. If we do similar numbers for Sigachi, for FY24 they had average realization of INR 210 per KG for MCC. Sigachi sells only MCC currently.

Under no circumstances, the variation in realization could be so much. Can someone help me to understand this.

Thanks
Disclosure - No investment in Accent.

2 Likes

Hi , pls listen to latest Concall with investors uploaded by company…answered about it wrt to raw material used and price of their products when compared to sigachi

1 Like

I listened to the call again. The mgmt clarified responded to the lower margins compared to Sigachi. On RM cost, mgmt. mentioned that they purchase a higher priced product. And on finished goods pricing they mentioned that they sell at a competitive price compared to Sigachi.

Somewhere in 7-8 minute they mention that they sell MCC at INR 200 per KG.
So the question still stays.