@Amit2saxena
Thanks for seeking my view. My view may be negatively biased due to my exit and investment in competitor ITC.
As correctly pointed out by you, the company spent around Rs 350 Cr for purchase of leasehold land. As per screener data Rs 350 Cr are utilised for purchase of land while around Rs 73 Cr is addition in Plant and Machinery which I assume normal mainteance and growth related expense.
I also gone through Q2FY24 results which has following comments in the covering letter.
From this, it appear that company management intend to integrate its operations at one place and likely gain from synergy. Further, it is likely to release Azamabad property in Hyderabad, which may be encashed in future. Hence, to take a view only on purchase of land and infer that management is misallocating capital may not be correct in my limited understanding. One need to see action of management, specificially about land encashment/utilisation of Azambad in Hyderbad and how it share the benefit with the shareholders. In short term, such action would mean lower other income and hence lower dividend distribution, but in long term, it might be positive for the company.
Disclosure: I have exited from VST couple of years back and continue to remain invested in ITC. Hence, my view may be negatively biased. I have excellent track record in being wrong with my forecast. I am not SEBI registered advisor. I am suggesting any investment action in the company.
Why the company invest huge amount to purchase the lease when they already had the lease and also doing business from there.And what incremental revenue this land can generate for the company, any idea?
I am expecting that the market value of the land will be much higher. They can sell the land and move outside the city at a much cheaper cost. The return will be distributed as dividend