Ujjivan Small Finance Bank - Will It Finance our future also?

Yes, Sarthak, the sector has not played out as anticipated. The cycles seem to have compressed ever since the listing of the MFI sector, I do not know whether this is because of market players in the shadows who see the sector as an easy target whenever the valuations rise. The RBI, and media have had a field day with this sector with a constant stream of comments and articles against it. This is not to play the victim card, the industry is vulnerable and in any modern economic system, one’s weakness will be exploited.
I am unsure about the future of the industry, as to how it will look going forward, and whether or not we will have elongated periods of normal functioning like we used to pre-COVID and DEMON. This cycle was soured by PE-funded smaller MFIs that were looking to grow aggressively. While they have learnt their lesson and the new regulations will only make the industry stronger, such irresponsible new competition can come up anytime if the regulations are ever relaxed.

There are too many unknown unknowns to forecast, even though the future of the industry seems to be moving towards secured with the JLG model acting as a funnel for larger secured loans, this does open/continue the possibility of evergreening. Even with such micro-secured collateral, in a real crisis, the recoverability timeline and amount, en masse of such assets is yet unknown.

That being said, valuations are subjective for now, during times of fear, even sub-book valuations can be justified and vice versa. For the sector to consistently achieve and maintain 2+x PB they would have to reduce the volatility in earnings/ROA. Whether going secured will help them with that remains to be seen.

At the current juncture, selling out and moving on to alternate opportunities will be a subjective call, dependent on each investor’s thought process. Difficult to say right now, who would be right or wrong in the future.

4 Likes

In Malkundi village, 32-year-old Krishnamurthy hanged himself at his home on Monday. Police said Krishnamurthy was unable to repay Rs 4lakh loan taken from Dharmasthala Mahila Swasahaya Sangha, Ujjivan finance company and three other finance firms.

2 Likes

Prema had taken a loan of six lakh rupees from Ujjivan Bank in 2018. Despite repaying this amount over time, the bank continued to demand another six lakh rupees, resulting in harassment that led her to consume the pesticide. The family expressed their deep sorrow, with Manikya, Prema’s daughter, lamenting, “Our mother’s death is the result of Ujjivan Bank’s actions. We had already repaid six lakh rupees, yet they keep demanding more and have seized our home. Now, we have lost our mother. Who will guide us now?”

https://www.thehansindia.com/karnataka/naxalite-lakshmi-surrenders-karnataka-declared-naxal-free-941731

Quite disturbing.

1 Like

Noticed a pattern:

  • Oct 2021

    • A probable indication of insider trading
      • 29 Oct 2021 - Shares were up 18%
      • 30 Oct 2021 - Bank announced that they met TODAY (30 Oct 2021) and proposed reverse merger - Ujjival Financial Services to be merged into Ujjivan SFB.
      • See twitter: x.com
    • When a question about this was raised by one of the investors during con calls, the management mentioned that it was open information we were going to reverse merge in the mentioned period.
  • Jan 2025

    • Share price, in the last one week has increased by close to 20%
    • Today the management announced application for universal bank
    • Now the share price is lagging (despite the announcement)
    • It just gives a bad feeling.

While I am happy as an investor (given the significant jump in such a short time), it doesn’t offer a lot of confidence in governance practices that such incidents are clearly noticeable.

9 Likes

They have already mentioned in the con call that they have spent 6Cr to apply for banking license.

2 Likes

Re: “insider trading”. Ujjivan does not have any promoter now. All members of BOD are professional non owner managers. So, right now, there are no “insiders” per se.

Yes, you have observed it correctly. There are many a times when the stock moves at the end of a month/quarter and before result release which tells me that someone knows the non-public data beforehand.
Though no one would be foolish enough to directly trade on this insider information. What must be happening is that some employee in the accounting department is paid off in cash to disclose this information to a broker of some big trader. Even then if they make it too obvious SEBI would catch them.
This is not an Ujjivan specific issue though, this happens in many other listed cos.

4 Likes

Insiders are not just promoters. CxOs, MDs, BoD, Lawyers, Accountants are all considered insiders

5 Likes

Own employees or auditor’s employees leaking information can happen in any company including public sector companies. It’s not an Ujjivan specific issue.

In the market, there is always someone who knows information than you do … but that does not mean we can’t outperform the market. That’s why long-term vision is paramount. Trying to trade the news never works as most of the upward or downward movement has been captured by the time it becomes mainstream. And this is across all asset classes.

A large hit coming in the current quarter?
Ujjivan SFB has put up for sale ₹364.5 crore stressed micro banking portfolio loans to an Asset Reconstruction Company (ARC) as part of its efforts to enhance asset quality. This portfolio includes ₹294.5 crore loan pool, which were 150 days past due (DPD) and ₹70 crore of technical write-offs (meaning high probability of recovery).

For context, Ujjivan has provision coverage of 66.51%. Meaning, even they, realistically, expected about 33-odd% recovery

Despite that, the initial bids received are only for ₹34.26 crore (9.4%), indicating a more than 90% haircut.

If they are unable to get any better counterbids, ARCIL (the ARC that has bid ₹34.56 crore, will end up winning the bid).

Now since 66.51% has been provided - 364.5*66.51% = ₹242.43 crores, but they are receiving only 34.26 Crores (as per this bid), meaning, they will need to provide for remaining

Remaining amount to provide for = (Total Pool - SR/Cash received - provisions already made) = 364.5 - 34.26 - 242.43 = 87.81 Crores. To put this number into perspective, their most recent quarterly profit before tax was 136 crores.

Alternatively, if they are able to receive twice the amount (best-case scenario?, I will come to this in a moment), they will still need to provide for 87.81-34.26 = 53.55 Crores (39.8% of their most recent - Dec 2024 quarterly profit)

If someone can provide insights if this is indeed how numbers are accounted for or is the pool to ARC provided in full outright and then later provisions are written back based on recovery from ARC pool? (In substance, the numbers above would however remain still true, just the accounting treatment - for prudence sake - might be to provide in full and then write back as recovery happens).


The reason I call twice the current bid as best case scenario is because as per this Business Standard article dated Feb 24 2025 - https://www.business-standard.com/industry/banking/ujjivan-sfb-calls-swiss-challenge-for-arcil-s-bid-for-micro-bad-loans-125022400874_1.html, there are other lenders, who are in similar situation and are inviting bids between 5-15% of their pool size of microfinance loans.

IndusInd Bank had sought bids from ARCs to offload ₹1,573 crore of non-performing microfinance retail loans from over a million accounts. The bank had invited bids on a 100 per cent cash basis from entities interested in acquiring these assets, and set a reserve price of ₹85 crore, which would translate into a recovery of 5.04 per cent for the bank.

Utkarsh SFB was also looking to offload around ₹355 crore of microfinance loans and had set a reserve price of ₹52 crore.

What we need to ascertain though in order to concretely come to the other side of this pain is, is this the last of it or is there more pain awaiting discovery / dealing-with / writing-off / providing-for / selling-to-ARC / etc.

Basically, when can all the energies of management go back to business-as-usual?

3 Likes

I think the way to look at this is -

Gross NPA for the bank as on 31 Dec 24 are 2.68% of gross loan book which is 30,466 crores therefore gross NPA are approx 817 crores.

now gross NPA are loan and/or principal outstanding for 90 or more days and net NPA are 0.56% of gross loan outstanding which comes out to approx 171 crores therefore the difference between gnpa and nnpa i.e 646 crore has already been set aside by the company from profit and/or capital for loan outstanding more than 90 days.

An amount of Rs. 171 crores more need to set aside for loan and/or principal not paid for 90 or more days.

therefore I think that the pool they are auctioning must already be provided for and will be charged back to P&L.

3 Likes

Bank has completed the sale of its non-performing assets (NPA) and written-off loans worth ₹364.51 crore to an Asset Reconstruction Company (ARC) for a consideration of ₹34.26 crore!!

The bank has offloaded bad loans at a significant discount to clean up its balance sheet.

1 Like

I think if they had not sold, the bank would have to provide for these loans. As a result, profitability would have been lower. The sale would improve profitability. This is likely being done to get the universal bank license. The bank is foregoing the recoveries from these loans (gains made by the ARC). May be the management believes the opportunity cost is lower than the benefits.

4 Likes