Shivalik Bimetal Controls Ltd (SBCL)

So longevity of the designs are more than 15 years as a typical vehicle platform exists for 10-15 years. What changes are shapes and sizes of the shunt resistor based on battery pack design / power requirements / environmental factors etc.

ISA have 500-600 SKUs of shunt design. They used to patent this design at a discussion stage which became extremely inconvinient for the OEMs whenever they need to do slight modification or change the source. That is where new players like SBCL become extremely important from IP perspective.

Another thing to note is whenever a new shunt order or a design modification order comes, SBCL charges a tooling cost on that prototyping. Sometimes same OEM gives the order to multiple tier 1 and the tier 1 sends the same order to a few player. I came across an interesting instance where SBCL got the same prototyping order from 3 different Tier 1s.

The design, to approval to large volume delivery takes around 2-3 years as there are rigorous lifetime tests done on the components.

@Donald da, The module part is still unclear to me on whether they would become a full fleged module supplier. But it seems that the company is taking early steps towards becoming atleast a contract manufacturer for module components. Studying Tier 1s design freeze are a bit complicated at these stage as the SKUs would be even larger and there are no public information of it. These are custom tuned to the product’s requirment.

On the results with the US election and hopefully a significant policy push towards electrification, I feel that we will see good demand coming through in next 2-3 years.

Disc : I belong to this industry and significantly biased.

12 Likes

So, Metalor JV is off. Company will be dependent on just two products in the near future, atleast.

3 Likes

The company will still generate significant cash flows to go for some other venture in future. It’s good that they are weighing all possible options and not just jumping into the very first thing that they can lay hands on.
Though it may seem conservative, this cautious approach will be a saviour when economic slowdown patches are to be tackled.

I also don’t see any fault in going back on a decision that’s been taken just because an announcement had been made, as long as it benefits the company in the long run.

It may also have happened due to the change of management and their strategic vision for the company.

I specifically asked this so that they clarify to the entire community.

14 Likes

Q3 FY 25 Concall highlights:
•Bimetals saw growth in americas,while shunt showed degrowth.India saw good growth in shunt business owing to increased domestic manufacturing of relays.
•Looking for Forward integration in shunt business
1)Component to subassembly
2)Shunt strip to component
This will start contributing from next FY
•US customers are giving guidance on gradual recovery from Q4 in shunt business.
•Our customers wanted us to do Forward integration as subassembly is not their core business.
•Revenue from subassembly is 10x of that from shunt.Margins are similar to current ones in some category while in others they are higher.Due to this,we expect shunt revenue to more than double over next 2 years.
•There will also be newer customers who are willing to procure only as subassembly.
•Strip to component forward integration:
Expect revenue to be 2x(from 60 cr existing to 120 cr) with margins increasing by 4%.supply to start from April.
•Doing backward integration in some components to reduce cost and lead time.Not looking at forward integration in bimetals as it is commoditized.
•Almost 30% relays are now made in India ,rest are imported.Import should go down as more domestic capacity is coming up.we are sole supplier of shunts to domestic players.
•Even if EV 4W does not grow, we expect shunts to grow as even today majority of our shunts go into ICE,hybrid and 2W EV.Expect India 2W EV segment to show good growth .

My take:
1)Forward integration will create new chapter in company’s growth story.
But it will take time. They will not be able to convert all component sales to subassembly as currently component sales are 140 cr and if all were to get converted to subassembly,revenue guidance over next 2 years would have been 3-4x.but they have guided for 2x.so I feel forward integration will be limited
2) Smart meter have done really well and should continue this trajectory.
3)If they say that Indian 2W EV market should give good growth,even in past 3-4 years,2W EV have seen very good growth but shivalik did not have any growth in domestic shunt business apart from smart meter.why is it so?

Disclaimer:Invested at average price of 35.No transaction in past 30 days

12 Likes

Q3FY25 concall gave very interesting glimpses on the direction that the management wants to take with regards to shunts. I would highlight those as

  1. Backward Integration
  2. Forward Integration
  3. customer profiles

Backward Integration
It is good that the company has started to integrate backward to develop suppliers for metals and alloys for their specification. This is a long journey and can lead to many wonderful results. The most obvious is the Inventory days can reduce from 200 odd days to say less than 50 days ( This is my assumption). This allows the company to handle demand and supply shocks which puts them on a better footing via their Partners especially in a down cycle.

The second benefit of backward integration is the expertise in alloying which I believe is the heart of shunts. If they are able to make alloys and generate various material for different applications, they would be in a much stronger footing and this would also make them similar to issabellanhutte. Knowledge of alloy in this business is important as shunts are sensitive to temperatures and environment conditions. The more a shunt remains unaffected in the operating range ( i.e. the resistance does not change ) the accurate it becomes for current measurement.

But making alloys are tough but hopefully SBCL will be able to make some headway.

Forward Integration
This is what excites me the most, and I observed the excitement in the con-call participants as well. At present Shivalik buys alloys of a certain dimension, cuts them into strips, join the alloy with copper and then machines them.

Then they send this shunt to a Tier 2 or Tier 1 who would fit them in a module to make a current sensing module ( for larger batteries) or it can be directly put as a part of BMS ( usually in smaller batteries)

for more reading on this topic

What Shivalik said was that they will start to produce some of these modules which puts them in the league of the TIER - 2 s. Off course it is not clear if they will also buy the PCB or start to work on the PCB. I would go with the buying part as it seems that the management is taking small but focused steps towards value addition.

The obvious benefits of such forward integration is increase in Topline . A shunt sells for say 50 rupees and a module would sell for say 500. The margins of the shunt is 20% but the margin for modules probably would not be 20%, maybe close to 10% ( I am telling this from experience, but management thinks otherwise ). Also in case of very low volumes of say 5000 components, margins can be huge (25-30%) but that is materially insignificant to the company. I would put that as prototyping.

What interests me is that this gives them the opportunity to be a part of the product development cycle. Shivalik is already well known to work with Tier-1s to improve shunt designs and reduce cost ( 10 rupee reduction in cost for a volume of 1 Cr is 10 Cr in savings , In high volume business such small innovation can really impact the entire value chain ). I believe that as they give themselves more time towards the forward integration they will start to build more knowledge as a contract manufacturer and who knows at some point develop shunt modules themselves.

Now why would the customers want such capability from Shivalik. The obvious one is that it reduce their hassle of procuring parts from multiple vendors and then have quality assessments in every place. The activity from shunt to module will require at this stage only to do some soldering and fitment activities. Shivalik is probably very well placed to do so and is happy to do it. For quantities below 10000 it is probably a no brainer as the customer will most likely buy a out of the box BMS / Current sensing module.

My Concerns

  1. Solan as a location is not very convenient. Yes they might get cheap labor but in such a high margin and TAM business, should labor cost be your concern. I feel they should have facilities around Industrial hubs of South and North India.
  2. They should have their design centers in Bangalore / Hyderabad / Gurgaon . They must attract high quality talent if they want to do good in both metallurgy and EMS
  3. Hope they do not get distracted from the core objective of making shunts and start to build narrative about forward and backward integration.

Also my BIASED view of the Industry
At present the adoption of EVs has sort of plateaued ( and in some cases declining ) but this change is inevitable from a technological stand point. Imagine our Cars which are becoming technology rich with every passing day, these electronics needs power and the current source of power is the 12V Lead acid battery. The easiest way to increase power is to replace the lead acid battery by lithium ion batteries. Thus you need a BMS ad hence a shunt
The next part of the puzzle is the regulation and narrative around clean air and PM2.5 particles. Again, the hardest way is that you have a great exhaust system and filter the air out. This is expensive and beyond a point not effective
The easiest way is that you can simply improve the quality of emissions by the ICE engines by running it in the most optimum range. You can adjust the optimum range using battery as a source of power. When car is is idling you can charge your battery, when the car demands power you can discharge your battery . Thus you need a battery and motors and inverters → 6+ shunts

Finally 2W EV in domestic space has been quite popular and convenient, which would also keep a demand for shunts. As charging infra gets set up ( I am observing that as I am using an ev ) a lot of range related issues will go away. On top of that there is the battery as service ( BASS ) into play. I feel entrepreneurs can be really creative when it comes to EVs and there could be 2 and 3 W in different form factors suiting to customer needs. This segment will drive the usage of custom modules and I hope Shivalik will be able to capitalize on that oppurtunity

So my view still is that it is not gloom and doom and some regulations will start to kick in like CAFE Norms and CARB norms which will make it impossible to sell pure ICE cars.

41 Likes

Shivalik Bimetals: Forward and Backward Integration Strategy Overview

Key Points:

  • Forward Integration:

    • Shivalik is transitioning from supplying shunts to providing finished assemblies for battery management systems.
    • A $2 shunt component can be sold as a finished assembly for $20 to $30, indicating a potential tenfold increase in value.
    • Targeting 20-25% of business conversion in the first year could lead to more than double the current revenue from the shunt business within two years.
    • Contracts have been signed with two key customers for converting strip materials to components, with regular business expected to commence in April 2025.
  • Backward Integration:

    • The company is exploring in-house processing of raw materials (e.g., alloys, copper) instead of purchasing them in finished form.
    • This strategy aims to reduce costs and lead times, enhancing supply chain efficiency.
    • The required investments for this backward integration are not expected to be significant.

These strategic moves are designed to enhance profitability and operational efficiency, positioning Shivalik Bimetals for future growth.

2 Likes

Few questions for forward integration

  1. is it only assembly of parts in which case value addition will be only for assembling.
  2. what type of components go in subaasembly? What is the technical know how required to make it ?
  3. can they make it in existing location or require new factory?
2 Likes

I visited Shivalik’s stall at Elecrama, Greater Noida yesterday. I spoke to one of their Business Representative. On talking about what new your company is doing? He showed me some of assemblies which are forward integrated. So they are taking the work from their existing customers and offering them complete assembly rather than small connector / shunts. To me it was quite convincing from their customers point of view. However their quality and cost competitiveness will matter. But knowing Shivalik’s management, they should definitely be able to progress in this. I have also worked with a Car Manufacturing company and at supplier companies as well. This process of forward integration followed by many suppliers to grow big. And more than any thing… relationship, technical competency and quality wins.

17 Likes

With regards to your view on margins in forward integration being around 10%,mgmt has said in concall that bought out component cost would be 55-60%(in line with current RM cost).So if GM is 40%, they can easily do 20% at ebitda level.Or am I missing something ?

Secondly,mgmt is bullish on Indian 2W segment.But what I don’t understand is last year almost 19laks 2W EV’s were sold in India and still shivalik hardly has any revenue from it.why so?Could it be that like in case of relays for smart meter,in ev also entire BMS is getting imported and thus leaving very less space for shivalik?

6 Likes

Company came out with US tariff impact assessment note. Ghumman family trying to be more transparent with the investor community. This will help the company in the long run

12 Likes