REPCO home finance

What a good last minute response by QIB category getting oversubscribed 3.4 times suddenly.HNI & retail category to get full allotment.12.5% of Anchor investor quota was firmly allotted to

1)Goldman Sachs

2)Citi Bank

3)FT

4)Nomura

5)Icici MF

6)Sundaram MF

7)Birla Sunlife

8)Reliance banking MF

Besides carlyle which owned 50% stake in co since 2007 @ 50 rs is still invested with 25% stake & rest he sold recently to Wolfenson ( a PE of former WB President ),Creodor LLCs another PE player & a host of 21 HNIs

SP Tulsian expects a EPS of 15 in March 13 & BV of 100 approx.ROE is around 22% & NIM around 4% .PBV is around 1.7

Further most of the loans are of 8-9 lacs for 8-9 year duration & as such qualify for PSL lending by several banks specially Pvt banks who are looking for safe PSL investments.

Due to the loan size NHB also gives 1% intt subvention.As 50% of loan book is with small business persons intt & margins are higher than the loans extended to salaried persons.As such NIMs are on the higher side.

Checked with a senior NHB official who was quite sanguine with co working & loan book.NHB maintains an onlinne DB of all household registries done in India & all HFCs N banks can check the quality of registration papers to avoid fraud like CIBIL.

Views invited whether to buy more on listing as listing may be at par or even below 172.

Angel Report

Operates in attractive loan segment - Priority sector home loans: RHFL is largely

focused on providing home loans in tier-II and tier-III cities (with a sub-`10lakh

average loan ticket size), due to which a large part of its book qualifies as priority

sector lending (PSL) for banks. In our view, NBFCs operating in PSL segments

enjoy competitive advantages, as most banks (especially in the private sector)

have a perennial shortage in meeting their PSL targets, creating favorable

demand-supply dynamics for those NBFCs that can source higher-yielding PSL

loans at reasonable asset quality.

REPCOâs loan book profile also allows it to procure 44% of its total borrowing via

low-cost NHB refinance averaging about 7.5-8% (NHB refinance is available

under various schemes, primarily for rural loans upto `15lakh and also for low

cost urban housing loans up to `10lakhs). Moreover, the funding that it gets from

banks in turn largely qualifies as PSL for the banks (loans by banks to NBFCs,

which are on-lent as home loans less than `10lakhs qualify as PSL). This makes it

attractive for banks to lend to RHFL at a reasonable cost (about 100bps above

base rate), as against alternatives such as parking funds under RIDF at extremely

low yields, to meet their PSL targets. Relatively low-cost NHB and bank funding

enables it to maintain healthy margins and return ratios (NIMs at 3.8% and RoE

at 22.2% in 1HFY2013, calculated on an annualized basis)

In terms of borrower profile, around 53% of RHFLâs outstanding loan book

constituted loans to relatively higher-yielding higher-risk non-salaried segment. To

mitigate risks, the company, lends at a low LTV of about 65%, as per the

management. In terms of geographical presence, 67% and 98% of its business is

concentrated in Tamil Nadu and South India, respectively, largely in tier-II and

tier-III cities.

Management expects strong growth to continue: Over FY2008-12, the company

grew its loan book at a CAGR of 43.8% (albeit on a small base) to `2,802cr,

driving PAT CAGR of 43.3%. As of September 30, 2012, its CRAR stood at a

comfortable 15.9% (entirely tier-I). Further, IPO proceeds would increase its

capital base by nearly 0.9x, providing enough headroom for maintaining strong

loan growth for the next few years as well. Funding mix is also expected to remain

stable (In FY2014 NHB refinance facility for Rural housing fund increased by 50%

to `6,000cr; bank demand for PSL opportunities is also expected to remain strong

and future outlook is favorable, in our view, given governmentâs priority sector

focus).

Outlook & Valuation: RHFL generated 22.2% RoE in 1HFY2013E and would trade

at 1.8x FY2013E ABV (at the upper end of its price band, based on post-issue

networth). Closest comparable peer - Gruh HF (mainly western India, rural and

semi-urban focus, largely PSL qualifying home loans) appears extremely

expensive at valuations of 7.3x FY2013E BV, notwithstanding its ~30% earnings

growth trajectory and ~35% ROEs (FY2013E). Other NBFCs like Mahindra

Finance and Shriram Transport Finance operating in different priority sector

segments to a varying degree and generating similar return ratios, are trading at

2.6x and 2.3x FY2013E ABV, respectively (but they have larger, relatively more

seasoned loan books and longer proven track record). Overall, keeping in mind

RHFLâs attractive niche loan segment, strong growth prospects and reasonable

valuations, we recommend subscribe to the issue at the upper band

Following brokerages houses n journals recommended applying in Repco IPO

1)HDFC Securities

2)Angel(abv report)

3)Sharekhan

4)Motilal Oswal

5)Edelweiss

6)Capitalmarket -43/100

7)BS

8)ET

9)Icici Direct

  1. SP Tulsian

Those against

  1. Business Line

  2. Arun Kejriwal

  3. First Choice IPO Analysis

Hi Vivek,

A few observations on the brokerage report you have posted. This is more about the report being one-sided and not about the com:

  1. No mention of NPA anywhere though they are analysing a lending institution! (Unless you have missed pasting some part of the report)

  2. It looks like for P/B ratio they have taken FY13 Expected BV which will include equity raised from IPO reducing the ratio. But for ROE they have taken HYFY13!! Just cross-check pls.

With so many institutions favoring the IPO I am more convinced about a rerating in Canfin :slight_smile:

Will wait for Exce’ls peer analysis to see if there is still anything interesting in this com.

Cheers

Vinod

Derived from a broker report

HDFC: only mortgage business considered

DHFL: high asset growth is because of first blue acquisition

INR Mn HDFC LIC Gruh DHFL Avg Repco
NII 2.56% 2.63% 4.64% 2.66% 3.12% 4.49%
Non Int Income 0.98% 0.49% 0.46% 1.07% 0.75% 0.66%
Total Income 3.45% 3.12% 5.10% 3.73% 3.87% 5.14%
Opex 0.34% 0.50% 1.00% 1.27% 0.78% 0.85%
Op Profit 3.20% 2.62% 4.10% 2.45% 3.09% 4.29%
Provisions 0.23% 0.14% 0.27% 0.13% 0.19% 0.29%
Profit Bef Tax 2.97% 2.48% 3.83% 2.31% 2.90% 4.00%
ROA 2.08% 1.79% 2.82% 1.74% 2.11% 2.94%
Leverage 12.0% 11.4% 10.5% 11.4% 11.3% 7.6%
ROE 24.7% 20.6% 29.5% 20.0% 23.7% 22.3%
FY2008 to H1 FY13 Asset Growth CAGR 20% 29% 24% 47% 30% 43%
FY2008 to FY12 Net Profit CAGR 10% 24% 30% 39% 26% 44%

I think the data points for Repco are good if one were to consider the NPA issue to be not too bothersome. With the current property prices not likely to go down too much, I guess it makes sense to focus on the other parameters and thats where Repco looks good esp the net profit growth.

I think it might be a good idea to buy on any declines post listing due to poor markets condition or stock specific declines.

One thing that is nagging me is that a lot of reports are taking it for granted that housing finance companies are going to keep growing “since the sector is underpenetrated”.

Any chances of the companies in the sector facing any headwinds?

One chance I see is somekind of sharpish correction in real estate prices which might lead to higher NPAs.

:))

As per the several reports Repco has encountered only 0.08% NPA in last 10 years over the disbursal of Rs 4600 Crores . Following are the extracts from Motilal Oswal Report

**Asset quality volatile; however credit losses are minimal
**
)- RHFLas gross non-performing assets (NPAs) increased to about 2.1 % in Sept-2012 v/s 1.4% in Mar-12 and 1.8 % in Sept-11, while other HFCs have reported an improvement in asset quality.

)- The increase was on account of the subdued economic environment coupled with massive power outages in the state of Tamil Nadu (Since RHFLs exposure to self employed largely SMEs- who have been impacted by power outages) which has exerted pressure on re-payment capability. The company, in view of the above, has taken initiatives to improve its monitoring and collection processes.

)- Company generally face higher delinquencies during the year, due to high share of non-salaried in portfolio (owing to lumpy income profile of borrowers) however the ultimate credit losses are minimal at 0.08% of the disbursements in last 12 years of existence indicated the strength of portfolio.

)- Considering the ongoing weakness in the operating environment, asset quality of RHFL could be under some pressure in near term. Nevertheless, in light of strong recovery systems, adequate cushion available in the form of equity Link: http://www.valuenotes.com/market-action/market/market-action.php of the borrower (only 14% portfolio as on September 30, 2012 was at more than 80% LTV) and access to SARFAESI, eventual credit losses may not increase sharply from current levels.

**Valued at 1.7x FY13E BV: Superior return ratios and strong growth trajectory
**
)- At the upper end of the price band, RHFL will trade at 1.7x FY13 BV vs 7.6x FY13E GRUH Finance (which has a similar business model). RHFL appears expensive when compared to similar size HFCs like GIC Housing Finance (1.2XFY 13 P/B) and Canfin Housing Finance (0.8X FY13 P/B). However, this should be seen in context of superior RoAs of 2.7%+ (v/s 1.4-1.6% for peers).

)- Niche presence, strong capitalization and gradual diversification will enable a healthy loan growth of over 30% for next 3 years. This coupled with above industry average NIM will enable the company to consistently deliver RoAs of 2.5%+. While RoEs are likely to decline in near term increasing leverage would boost RoEs in medium term. Motilal Oswal recommends subscribe to the issue.

Vinod bhai abhi ladki Monday tak ghar mein hai .Cheques will get cleared only on Tuesday.No activity in GMP. Should I let the cheques pass? Pl advise.Mailing you different reports

One correction

The leverage is in terms of number of times and not in %

HDFC | LIC | Gruh | DHFL | Avg | Repco | NII | 2.56% | 2.63% | 4.64% | 2.66% | 3.12%
0.98% | 0.49% | 0.46% | 1.07% | 0.75% | 3.45% | 3.12% | 5.10% | 3.73% | 3.87% | 5.14% | Opex | 0.34% | 0.50% | 1.00% | 1.27% | 0.78%
3.20% | 2.62% | 4.10% | 2.45% | 3.09% | 4.29% | Provisions | 0.23% | 0.14% | 0.27% | 0.13% | 0.19%
2.97% | 2.48% | 3.83% | 2.31% | 2.90% | 4.00%
ROA | 2.08% | 1.79% | 2.82% | 1.74% | 2.11% | 2.94%
Leverage | 12.0% | 11.4% | 10.5% | 11.4% | 11.3% | 7.6%
ROE | 24.7% | 20.6% | 29.5% | 20.0% | 23.7% | 20% | 29% | 24% | 47% | 30% | 10% | 24% | 30% | 39% | 26% | 44%

Hi,

Agree with Hitesh, its better to wait for a decline. At this price for a relatively untested com and management I feel the margin of safety is poor.

Hitesh Bhai,

The major risk for HFCs occur when they give large loans to builders. Like in the case of LICHF there are chances of corruption in that business and also high value NPAs. Serious regulatory steps to curb blackmoney flow in this system can have some segment of investors out, but that would be overall good for the industry to build credibility.

At any point in future if gov takes away the tax benefit it will be a big dampner, but no signs of that happening. Other regulatory issues can be mandatory higher provisions etc.

Gov would generally want this sector to do well as it is linked to many industries doing well - construction, cement, steel etc and it indirectly gives employment to lots of people in lower income strata.

There is heavy competition building up in the HFC segment slowly. The number of cos in the fray are increasing - M&M, L&T, Magma, Muthoot, Microfinance cos can all up the ante. And currently all seem to fancy the middle-lower income group. We need to see how this will affect growth and NIM. But the opportunity size is quite large at least in the medium term.

Overall I think its a safe investment. Even though its in the rate sensitive segment we have seldom seem housing finance industry face issues of very low growth.

Cheers

Vinod

1 Like

Few observations from my personal experiences on the point of real estate price correction which might lead to higher NPAs.

1). With a loan ticket size of 7-10 lacs (property value at 10-15 lacs), most probably, the houses under loan from Gruh, Repco are not in heart of city and not in apartments complexes. They are most likely independent houses (including land) at the outskirts of the city or under developed areas inside the city, owned by ppl who probably do business or are self employed inside the city.

2). My observation from following the development and expansion of 2 cities (Bhubaneswar & Bangalore) is that, the outskirts/under-developed areas of a city get occupied by this kind of small business and self employed people first, who are more willing to face the hardships of no infra (transport, water,electricity etc…), so that, they can own a home of their own. However, over a period of time govt is bound to take note of this unplanned development and provide the infra needed for people, mostly due to vote bank. Once the infra is provided, the area slowly becomes part of city and real estate estate prices tend go higher to reflect the new normal.

3). 10-12 years ago, one could practically seat on the road during evening time (me and my college mates did) for a chat in areas like HSR Layout, Marathalli in Bangalore. Things have changedunbelievablynow, and even to cross the road now, one needs assistance of a traffic police.

4). Housing prices, so often see a time correction too, for example as perResidex, a city wise housing price index created and updated by National Housing Bank since 2007 (base of 100). ForBangalore, 100 has become 98 in 5 years (2007-12). But in a time correction, the home owners equity would move up over a period of time due to repayments and thus reduce the chances of default even during sharp price correction.

I think Repco/Gruh are in a subset of HF Business, which is likely to grow at a higher rate due to hitherto un-addressed market. The risks to this business will come more from a client profile kind of risk than property price risk unlike say HDFC, which can’t grow at such higher rate and will also face the risk of sharp price correction (if it happens).

Hi,

I just went through repco thread, and its amazing how different (Contrasting) views can throw upon amazing insights, which for a person like me (less informed) gets really enriching. I feel that apart from numbers which in case of repco are a bit confusing, its imp to know management capability and integrity. In businesses like these, management plays a big role in deciding the long term direction of business. IMHO, If we can get more insight about management and its thought process about loan disbursement and managing ricks, it will be easier to understand this company.

Regards,

Vikas Kukreja

REPCO HOUSING FINANCE: Management meet takeaways; margins to remain stable/increase; asset quality to improve

(REPCO IN, Mkt Cap USD0.23b, CMP INR200, Not Rated)

MotilalOswalmet Repco Home Financeâs Executive Director, Mr. V Raghu to understand Repcoâs growth strategy, business outlook, competitive scenario and vision. Key takeaways:

)- Housing finance market continues to remain buoyant especially underpenetrated self employed segment, and by increasing its reach expects a healthy 35%-40% loan growth for next 2 years.

)- Likely Ratings upgrade: RHFL has approached rating agencies for a rating upgrade, currently it commands A+ rating, however its rating is lower than its peer due to high leverage. Post recent capital raising of Rs2.6bn, CAR stands at 25% coupled with strong p

Expects to maintain margins above 4% and spreads over 3%, RHFL will also increase proportion of LAP to 20% (from existing 15%) of loan book that will helpRHFL to boost its overall yields.

)- Asset quality is likely to improve going forward, in line with improving situation in states of Tamil Nadu & Andhra Pradesh. Management has also made some operational changes and have strengthened the recovery process which has started yielding results and the trend is likely to continue.

Housing finance market continues to remain buoyant expect healthy 35%-40% loan growth for next 2 years

Repco has delivered a loan book CAGR of over 40% between FY08-FY13. Management believes that the housing market continues to remain buoyant; especially the underpenetrated self employed segment which accounts for ~53% of loan book.

)- Management is confident of the strong growth prospects and expects a healthy loan growth of over 35%-40% for next two years.
)- Well capitalized for growth; Post the recent capital raising (Rs2.6b) the CAR stand at 25% (largely Tier 1) which is sufficient to take care of the growth requirements for next 2-3 years.

Likely rating upgrade: Funding cost to come down and funding base to become diversified

)- Likely Rating upgrade: RHFL has approached rating agencies for a rating upgrade, currently it commands A+ rating, however its ratings are lower compared to peers due to high leverage & privately held company status.

)- However post the recent listing,RHFL stands well capitalized with capital adequacy of 25% and leverage of ~5x, RHFL stands a strong chance of rating upgrade to AA, which would cause reduction in cost of funds, diversify the borrowing mix and enable it to tap low cost avenues like NCDs, CP etc.

)- Expects to maintain margins above 4% and spreads over 3%. RHFL will also increase proportion of LAP to 20% (from existing 15%) of loan book that will helpRHFL to boost its overall yields.
)- Recent listing has helped RHFL in attracting funds at lower interest rates. There have been instances where it has been able to get funds at 9.7% from large PSU & as well as from private banks

Asset quality likely to improve

)- Repcoâs NPL levels are higher than industry average due to its presence in self employed segment (v/s other players who are largely focused on salaried segment) as the cash flows of self employed individuals are uneven leading to volatility in the asset quality.
)- Although NPL levels are volatile, the actual loan loss toRHFL are miniscule. RHFL has written off only 0.04% (~Rs 40mn) of the cumulative disbursements made since its inception in year 2000.

)- However the asset quality outlook is likely to improve as in the recent past management has taken some corrective measures and shifted focus on containing NPL levels by making some operational changes and aligning new incentive structure which revolves around recovery.

)- NPL levels in Tamil Nadu has improved in past 6 months due to improvement in power situation, TN NPLs now accounts 0.83% of over overall NPLs of 1.48%.

)- RHFL is actively using the SARFASI window to recover loans and this has significantly boosted the recovery process, RHFL has won ~90% of cases in SARFASI.

Branch expansion: deepen presence in southern states and gradually expand in other states

)- RHFL will continue to expand the branch network as part of its strategy to expand wider and deeper, however it will be done in a staggered manner with 15-20 new branch additions every year.

)- While the business from new states will grow at a healthy pace, south states will continue to account for ~70% of business.

)- Employee addition will be in line with business growth, RHFL as a stated policy adds one employee for every Rs100mn of additional business. Management plans to increase the headcount from existing 300 to 900 over next 2-3 years.

**
**

NHB refinance for rural housing

-RHFL has predominantly used National Housing Bank refinance (36% of total borrowings as on March 2013) to fund its disbursements, while remaining was from various SCBs and from parent, Repco Bank. Majority of RHFL as on March 2013 are in Tier II /Tier III towns and a significant portion of its portfolio qualifies as rural housing finance, and eligible for low-cost funding from NHB.

)- The cost of borrowing from NHB was about 8%, while the same from banks stood at about 11%. As RHFLâs bank funds are generally linked to the base rate any reduction in the systemic rates is likely to favorably impactRHFL cost of bank funds.

)- Although the NHB funding will reduce as proportion to overall funding, but RHFLwill continue to use NHB refinance window for the rural loans.

**
**

**Focus on non-salaried borrower segment where competitive intensity is miniscule
**

)- RHFL primarily targeting markets that are relatively underpenetrated the key target markets of company are in tier 2 and tier 3 cities and at the peripheral areas of tier 1 cities.

)- RHFL focuses on self employed segment and is not overly reliant on highly competitive salaried class. Loans to salaried and non-salaried borrowers are 47 % and 53%, outstanding loan book on FY13.

)- The non-salaried borrower segment comprising SEPs and SENPs, is under penetrated and underserved by larger HFCs and banks. RHFL has been able to successfully penetrate the non-salaried segment given its direct customer contact, tailored approach and personal evaluation processes followed during credit appraisal.

)- The competitive intensity is miniscule in this segment as most of the banks and HFCs primarily caters to salaried segment, thereby ensures strong pricing power to RHFL

**
**

Valued at 1.4x FY15E P/B; Not Rated

RHFL has delivered loan book CAGR of over 40% between FY08 and FY13, with equally impressive earnings growth of 43% between FY08-FY13.RHFL has delivered average RoAs and RoEs of ~2.8% and ~22%, respectively over FY08-FY12. At CMP of Rs200 stock is valued at 1.45x FY15E P/B, and 10x FY15E P/E.Motilal Oswalbelieve the multiple is inexpensive given strong past track record of loan growth and earnings trajectory coupled with strong future prospects.

MUTUAL FUNDS HOLDINGS IN REPCO HOME FINANCE. THIS IS BESIDES 25% CARLYLE HOLDING N 10 % EACH HOLDING OF WOLFENSON N CREDO FII HOLDING WHICH IS LOCKED FOR 1 YEAR.
ANCHOR INVESTOR LIST IS ALSO MENTIONED EARLIER IN THE THREAD.
NO ONE HAS SOLD EXCEPT BY MERRYL LYNCH WHICH WAS BOUGHT BY NOMURA ON FIRST DAY

Repco has a PCR of 30% (src: angel report), much lower than any other HF (~100%) / NBFC(~70%) Obviously the PAT has been padded up because of that.

The ratings upgrade would result in a reduction in the cost of borrowings by 30 to 40 basis points. This upgrade should be taken very positively by the markets.

The expanded Capital Adequace ratio of 25.5% because of the IPO funds should also auger well for the company’s valuations.

Moreover, the recent Supreme court order in favor of commissioning the first phase of the Nuclear power plant in Tamil Nadu should help reduce the power woes of the state. As more than half of Repco’s lending comes from Tamil Nadu and a major chunk of it originates from self employed people the improved power scenario should do well for companies based out of this state.

I think the company looks set to surprise all of us with its results over the next two quarters.

From My Blog-- (http://fundoopupil.blogspot.in/2013/06/repco-possible-multibagger.html)

Views Invited....

Value Investors avoid IPOs saying Its Probably Overpriced. But when Repco Home Finance came out with its IPO, it immediately caught my eye.... Maybe because of Representative Bias (similar businessto Gruh Finance, a huge wealth creator) or because of Authority Bias. Or maybe because of superb business fundamentals & great past record.

But tobuild a solidconviction,good performance after IPO was a must. And Repco hasdeliveredexactly what the doctor ordered.

Repco is in the business of housing finance. What separates it from other housing finance comps & banks is itsTier-II & Tier -III focus, Small average loan size (<10 lakhs) & loans to non-salaried class.

If you are holding for Long Term, what's more important is how the business will look in the future than what is looking right now!!!

Based on this logic, I tried to project how Repco will look after FY2017-18... i.e 5 years down the line. Here is my take-


2013

2018

Equity

634

1200

Debt

3158

9749

Good Assets

3514

10721

NPA

36

108

Cash

210

67

Other Assets

32

52

NII

125

375

Other Income

15

24

Provisions

9

16

Cost

24

66

PBT

107

318

Tax

27

79

PAT

80

238


Assumptions-
25% annual disbursements growth, 20% annual repayments growth, NIM of 3.5%, Div Payout of 15%, Gross NPAat 1%, Tax rate of 25%.

Facts underlying the assumptions-

â There is Huge Demand for housing loans especially from Tier-II & Tier-III cities and especially from non-salaried class due to under penetration.

â Repco can Supply its product (loan) to meet this demand due to good Capital Adequacy Ratio having raised capital from IPO.

â The segment is Niche & there is limited competition due to small loan size, non-salaried customers.

Aggressive Assumptions?

The assumptions that I have taken are conservative, IMHO.

â Assumed 25% disbursements growth while comp has been growing at 40% historically.

â Assumed NIM of 3.5% while it was 3.9% last year & should improve as Repco's debt rating improves.

â Company's NPA has only been notional till now, it has hardly lost money as bad debt to customers.

On a PAT of 240 crs & Book Value of 1200 crs, Repco can trade at 3600 crs Mcap {15 times PE & 3 times PB}...

A cool 3 bagger in 5 yrs time.. with a CAGR of 22%.

Risks-

â Rash Lending- With so much cash at disposal, company can go into imprudent lending, resulting into bad debts & hence losses, which may hurt the shareholders.

â Slowdown in Home Purchases- Any slowdown in real estate activities can hurt the company.

1 Like

Hi Vinod,

I did a brief check on CanFin, i do not think it can be compared with Repco. CanFin supports all kinds of customers, LIG/MIG/HIG, all while Repco focuses on LIG only.

Thanks

Ashish

reallymalicious.

repco seems to be forming a flag pattern on daily charts. closing and sustaining above 220 levels could provide upside targets of 280 odd.

height of the flag is 60 units and breakout point is 220. that provides target of 280.

attached chart.


Hitesh Ji,

The earlier breakout from 170 odds to 220 odds was due to good results & improved expectations.

Now can 220 to 280 move happen without any fundamental reason?

PS- I have no knowledge of Technicals.

Hi Ahish,

My concern then was more because of the comparison straight away with Gruh just because both cater to the same segment. The LIG category is fancied because of higher NIM and reasonably low NPAs. The NIM of canfin at 3.2 is not very different from Repco and NPA of Repco was huge compared to both Gruh and Canfin during the listing time.

But recent results show NPAs have reduced substantially, so probably I got the NPA part wrong. The NPAs may not be leading to actual losses and could be more technical in nature due to power issues in tamil nadu etc.

There are many companies in housing finance business catering to LIG. To be a Gruh or even closer to that the com should possess excellent credit appraisal strength (unique for no income proof, self employed etc), collection capabilities, enough management bandwidth to expand and a really good standing in the credit market to raise debt at competitive rates. There is a chance that good performance in a geographic region cannot be replicated in other areas.

I have no idea on the management and their capabilities, vision and intentions. I need to study this in detail and is planing to do that with the improved performance and higher credit rating.

Thank You

Vinod

1 Like