Performant Healthcare Solutions: Turnaround complete. Time to gush cash flow

Overview:
Under the radar turnaround story, winning contracts from billionaire competitors, trading at a ridiculously cheap valuation, with 400% upside in short term, 800%+ long term.

Performant is a technology-based provider of audit and recovery services in the United States with a focus on the healthcare industry. Working with healthcare payers, Performant audits insurance claims to identify, prevent and correct billions worth of improper healthcare payments. A key to their success is the proprietary software that parses data far more efficiently than peers. Primary customers include government commercial health plans, CMS, Blues plans, regional Insurers, and commercial programs that operate in complex and highly regulated environments.

PFMT trades at a ridiculously cheap 1.25X EV/Sales, with potential to be an $8 stock within a few years. It was as high as $5 months ago. Within the last 4 years, all immediate competitors were acquired by PE at 5-7X EV/Sales. PFMT is an ideal private equity takeout candidate, who’s largest shareholder is currently Prescott Capital- a well respected SMID investor known for surfacing value of its holdings. PFMT is Prescott’s largest holding at over 10% of their fund. Another large sophisticated investor is Mill Road, which also has one of their executives sitting on PFMT’s board . There are two large motivated investors in control positions.

Growth:
PFMT continues to grow healthcare revenues, with mgmt targeting $500-$700M of revenue within a few years based only on existing services and noting EBIT margins in the high-20s on a mature basis. Overall profitability has been masked by the need to invest upfront. Given the current EV of $150M and margins in the high-20s, this should be attractive to investors. Mgmt has indicated 2022 target healthcare revenues of $92-96M. 2021 saw record healthcare revenues of $77.5M. Since 2014 Healthcare revenues have come from $3.4M annually to a 2022 revenue guidance of $94M (51% CAGR).

The current revenue model is success-based, fees are generated based on a percentage of validated recoveries for clients. Services do not require significant upfront investments by customers, not reliant on their spending budgets, while offering the opportunity to recover significant funds otherwise lost. Contracts are negotiated on case by case basis, fees may range from 10-30% of recoveries and the duration of contracts may last 3-5+ years. These are high margin, recurring revenue contracts, expected to provide multiple years of prolonged double digit growth.

Debt:
On Dec 17, 2021, entered a credit agreement with MUFG Union Bank for a $20M term loan and $15M revolver. The agreement matures at the end of 2026. The $20M was fully drawn as of Dec 31,2021, used together with cash on hand and proceeds from a recent equity raise to refinance an old agreement- yielding savings of $8M in 2022 alone. PFMT currently has $16M cash on hand and $15M of the revolver untapped, thus in a financial position to control their own destiny.

Competition:
The industry is mostly dominated by two independent players with a number of other competitors already rolled up through consolidation. The major competitors, HMS Holdings Corp (HMSY-US, was acquired by PE for $3.4B in Dec 2020) and Cotiviti (acquired by PEin mid-2018 for $4.9B) are huge, lumpy, less integrated players that have grown through acquisitions. PFMT is proving itself as an up and coming, independent contender in the space, more nimble and with a higher audit hit rate than the competition. Over the past few years, PFMT has continuously won contracts away from large peers, establishing itself as a superior product with a sustainable advantage, as evidenced by their ability to displace well-heeled incumbent providers of sophisticated clients.

Macro:
The macro environment indicates there should be tailwinds for the audit and recovery outsourcing business solutions PFMT provides. According to the CMS, national healthcare expenditures are forecast to grow at 5.4% CAGR for the next 8 years. Reaching $6.8T by 2028. Despite efforts to reduce the amount of improper payments, error rates in the industry range from 6% in commercial to 21.7% in government plans. Healthcare spending growth is driven primarily by a combination of increasing enrollment and cost inflation. As private organizations and state governments are struggling with lower revenues and budget deficits, this could create an increased focus on cost containment strategies where PFMT could play a supporting function.

Catalyst:
The recent sell-off was started on the concern that the recently won RAC Region 2 contract would be lost to the incumbent, Cotiviti, following an immediate protest to the decision. First, the ability to win RAC 2 via competitive legal tender is a testament to PFMTs ability to outcompete massive existing players fo government contracts. Second, protests and delays are a common when it comes to government contracts. Especially when an incumbent loses, they almost always protest the award. Occasionally they are succesful and it has to be re-tendered for another round of bidding, but historically they lose the appeal. The time to complete an appeal is often longer than originally anticipated or guided by the government when originally announced. Cotiviti support department claims that the contract has only been extended until Oct 30,2022. The likely scenario is that the contract was extended so that the current incumbent can collect on claims that were frozen during covid/pandemic restrictions. November will see the contract re-awarded to PFMT, relieving this overhang. Lastly, the contract is not meaningful enough in the grande scheme to be worth this much selling pressure, as the real upside for PFMT is in commercial plan growth.

Conclusion:
Historically, Performant Financial was a legacy debt recovery company working on defaulted student loans, federal treasury and state tax receivables and commercial recovery. . As of 2021 mgmt has sold certain non-healthcare recovery contracts (proceeds used to deleverage) and have not renewed existing recovery contracts, nor pursued non-healthcare opportunities. They are now a pure-play healthcare company growing at a rapid rate, it’s only a matter of time before they get takenout or get discovered by public markets closing the valuation gap with peers.

1 Like

Revenue Model:

The current revenue model is success-based, fees are generated based on a percentage of validated recoveries for clients. Services do not require significant upfront investments by customers, not reliant on their spending budgets, while offering the opportunity to recover significant funds otherwise lost. Contracts are negotiated on case by case basis, fees may range from 10-30% of recoveries and the duration of contracts may last 3-5+ years. These are high margin, recurring revenue contracts, expected to provide multiple years of prolonged double digit growth. Recent ramp up costs and Covid have been hurdles for the trajectory of the healthcare business as CMS, followed by other customers, requested a short-term pause on existing healthcare audits. As this has largely ended, expect revenues to normalize and continue trending higher. The technology is largely developed, so massive amounts of R&D is no longer needed. The largest cost to Performant is labour cost to ramp up and service new customers as more contracts are won.

There are two main revenue verticals:

1)Claims-Based Reviews(21% CAGR)
PFMT sifts through improperly coded insurance claims and determines whether a claim was overpaid and needs to be recuperated. Acting as a profit center for insurance companies, while taking 10-30% of recovered fees. For example, there may exist two codes for knee surgery, one of which is 5 times the cost of the other. The more expensive medical code was applied to the bill which was ultimately paid for incorrectly by the insurance company.

2)Eligibility- Based Reviews (66% CAGR)
Determines who is responsible for paying for an incident, procedure, or claim. For example, if an individual slips and hurts themselves in a Walmart, should the individual insurance pay, should Walmart pay, CMS, etc? As a 3rd party Vendor, PFMT helps insurance companies and CMS ensure accurate payments.

Insurance companies DO have some form of in-house claims assessment but they ALSO hire 3rd party vendors to try and accurately assess others. Typically, insurance company’s hire every vendor (Performant, Cotiviti + HMS [both owned by Veritas], Discovery Healthcare, Optum + Change HC [owned by UnitedHealth]) and have them compete for claims in a vendor stack model. For example, Humana would hire all vendors (excluding Optum and Change HC because they are owned by a competitor, United Health) to review all of their Durable Medical Equipment (DME) claims. First Humana will assess as many inhouse claims as possible so that they don’t pay 10-30% recovery fees. Then there is a queued pass system where the 1st ranked vendor get the first look on the claims to assess and refute claims for a 15-20% recovery fee. Then, the 2nd ranked vendor in the pass system will get the second look on those claims, and so on, until the last vendor gets to review the claims at a higher % recovery fee as an incentive for being last. DME would be just one vertical within Humana, among 40+ potential verticals.

Commercial insurers typically only use vendors that have contracts with CMS. As a smaller, independent player that has established credibility with CMS contracts, PFMT has leverage to grow in the commercial space. Growth can include growing the number of verticals within an individual provider. Currently PFMT has an average of 5 verticals within four of the five largest insurance companies (10M+ lives covered). Recall DME was one vertical. Improving results in DME may reward PFMT with access to more verticals within Humana (for example) such as Home Health, Hospice, skilled nursing, brain, etc. On average PFMT has 5 out of 45 verticals, plenty of room for growth. It costs the insurance nothing to onboard PFMT, their incentives are aligned. Another advantage for insurers to hire vendors to review claims compared to strictly in-house screening is because 3rd party vendors have data from CMS, Aetna, CIgna, Elevance, Humana, Small/Large insurers across the country which allows them to catch more claims that would normally be missed. PFMT can grow by acquiring new customers, new verticals and moving up the priority stack within verticals. Large competitors do not focus on the mid-tier plans such as Blue Cross and Blue Shield, PFMT can also target the mid-tier plans as a huge source of growth.

The integration process takes 6-9 months from the moment they win a contract. Then 2-6 months to get paid. Giving good visibility into revenues 1-5 years out. The way PFMT wins new programs is by approaching an insurance provider, running tests for about a year, then once they determine whether they can compete, they propose terms for a contractual agreement. Take a look at their Deck for a case study of their “land and expand” strategy. First they ask to run tests, data mine, then review past claims. Eventually they request a chance to review claims in the 4th position of the queue/pass system for a particular vertical. They prove themselves by increasing the total # of claims by 75%, thus winning higher ranking within that vertical queue. Eventually winning access to more verticals.

Mgmt has indicated 2022 target healthcare revenues of $92-96M. 2021 saw record healthcare revenues of $77.5M. Total revenues have recently taken a dip as the company moved away from legacy recovery markets. Since 2014 Healthcare revenues have come from $3.4M annually to a 2022 revenue guidance of $94M (51% CAGR), finally accounting for a majority of revenues ( 85% of revenues in the most recent quarter). In the long term, PFMT targets $500-750M in annual revenues with 20-30% ebitda margins. With mgmt mentioning a near term goal of $160-200M in the next 1-2 years being realistic. Mgmt has indicated they could look to move some of their workforce to the Philippines to improve margins, similar to what competitor Cotiviti has done (currently has about 35% margins- according to mgmt).

Contracts:

Current government contracts contribute a significant amount of revenues to their healthcare business and also offer a crucial intangible benefit. As the largest medical payer in the country, CMS contract wins give a stamp of approval for the large commercial plans and ultimately smaller potential customers as well. The total spend in the commercial markets is much larger than any government contracts, allowing for huge potential growth. During their recent Q2 earnings call, mgmt disclosed they were in advanced stages of negotiations with two midsized payers to become their exclusive payment integrity partner which would be an expansion of their traditional vendor stack model. Also something to consider, Humana and Anthem (Elevance Health) have been criticized for their growing days payable claims outstanding, and have openly mentioned their intent to pursue more outsourcing.

-Recently Re-awarded CMS RAC Region 1 (8.5 years, as of April 2021)
-CMC Region 5 National Contract DME/HHH (Durable Medical Equipment/ Home Health, Hospice)
-CMC RAC Region 2 awarded in March 2022 (8.5 year contract) but currently in protest by incumbent Cotiviti.
-Awarded HHS OIG IDIQ contract for medical review in 2022
-Engaged with 4 of the 5 largest national health plans

PFMT has three main targets:

1)National plans with 10M+ covered lives.Highly competitive, going against other large players. PFMT’s ability to win national CMS contracts gives a stamp of approval for other large commercial plans
2)Mid-tier plans with 500k-4M covered lives. Large Competitors dont focus on the mid-tier space, allowing for large growth potential
3)Smaller plans <500k covered lives. Small plans have least competition. PFMT is able to create SAAS solutions.

There is already an existing thread on the same company. that was initiated by you. I am not sure why start a new thread on the same company again. Request the attention of the moderators @Donald @basumallick

When the original thread was posted this was virtually a different company. There has since been a name change and full divestiture of legacy businesses. This is a material development worthy of a new thread. No need to run for the moderator friend