Financial makeup at its best - when management has not done what they shout in each concall / interview - this is what they do - increase the base of last year. Here they simply removed the value of Nuvama stake to increase the last year (FY2024) net debt value when compared to this year (FY2025) net debt position.
Based on what company has reported over last 1 year, following can be observed:
Business | Mar – 2024 | June – 2024 | Sep – 2024 | Dec – 2024 | Mar – 2025 | YOY Change |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBFC | 4,126 | Left blank as company reported gross debt | 3,650 | 3,089 | 2,890 | (1,236) |
Nido | 1,370 | 1,465 | 1,293 | 1,750 | 380 | |
EAAA | 445 | 385 | 414 | 364 | (81) | |
ARC | 1,351 | 830 | 299 | (159) | (1,510) | |
Corporate | 8,048 | 5,480 | 6,496 | 6,325 | (1,723) | |
Net Debt | 15,340 | 12,710 | 11,810 | 11,591 | 11,170 | (4,170) |
- NBFC net debt reduced by just Rs. 1,236 Cr. - which must be in proportion to recoveries and scale down of legacy AUM.
- Nido net debt increased by Rs. 380 Cr. - can be attributed to improved disbursement
- EAAA net debt reduced by Rs. 81 Cr. - not much material impact
- ARC net debt reduced significantly by Rs. 1,510 Cr. - as the recoveries from stressed assets are improving
- Corporate net debt reduced just by Rs. 1,723 Cr - this is the pain point and needs surgical strike with absolute precision.
From above, it seems financial makeup in reporting has been done to hide goof up at corporate level debt.
From Nuvama stake sale - company earned more than Rs. 3000 Cr+ (in June 2024 results PPT they reported Nuvama stake at Rs. 3,055/-) considering the high price at which stake was sold in two different tranches.
Now, considering the pure cash inflow of Rs. 3000 Cr+ and debt reduction of Just Rs. 1,723 Cr - creates a gap of Rs. 1,275 Cr.
This gap requires serious clarification from management - but will they explain - not sure.
If we retail investors have material answer to this gap - absolutely not.
If company has invested this amount in any business to solidify financial position - no disclosure from company.
Is it good or bad - for sure it is bad corporate governance - if this gap remains unanswered or if is known to only few.
Disc: Invested.