This was pointed out by CFO in one of the webinars with DSIJ. What he said was that the nameplate capacity calculation is based on a single size, 1 micron, running continuously. This is never the case as there are always different size requirements so that has a turnaround time. So a 75% utilization of nameplate capacity is considered good or “100%”. Cosmo was running at 95% of this 75% utilization.
Good results. US operations have also showed healthy improvement as guided by management. Expect margins to improve further with no new supply coming in over the next 1 year. EPS of Rs 60 looks easily achievable for FY20.
Hello
So the Cosmo films profit is corelate to price of raw material bopp and the oil. If the price of these things increase then profit gets lower. But the packing industry is also growing so how we think of it as a cyclical or mid turm story
How is CU at peak ? You are probably going at nameplate capacity utilization, which might not be the right way to look at it. Actual utlization is much lower than nameplate CU.
What’s the point ? wouldn’t it increase the risk for investors in the event company isn’t able to serve the debt in market downcycle or the excess supply?